|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]袁乐平,张文东,赵力梵,等.基于TEM模型的民航不安全事件关联规则挖掘与分析*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(10):31-36.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.10.005]
　YUAN Leping,ZHANG Wendong,ZHAO Lifan,et al.Mining and analysis of association rules in civil aviation unsafe incidents based on TEM model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(10):31-36.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.10.005]
点击复制

基于TEM模型的民航不安全事件关联规则挖掘与分析*
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
18
期数:
2022年10期
页码:
31-36
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2022-10-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Mining and analysis of association rules in civil aviation unsafe incidents based on TEM model
文章编号:
1673-193X(2022)-10-0031-06
作者:
袁乐平; 张文东; 赵力梵; 崔湘奇
（中国民航大学 安全科学与工程学院，天津 300300）
Author(s):
YUAN Leping;  ZHANG Wendong;  ZHAO Lifan;  CUI Xiangqi
(College of Safety Science and Engineering,Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin 300300,China)
关键词:
TEM; 民航不安全事件; 关联规则; 数据挖掘
Keywords:
threats and errors management (TEM);  civil aviation unsafe incident;  association rule;  data mining
分类号:
X949
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.10.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了预防民航不安全事件的发生，应用机组威胁与差错管理（TEM）模型分析2014—2020年民航事故/征候的航空安全报告资料，提取事件里存在于民航运行风险中潜在的情况、威胁、机组差错等因素，通过改进的关联规则方法挖掘其中的关联关系，包括挖掘与事件严重程度有关的因素，找到TEM模型中的关键因素和影响航空器结束状态的致因因素，并进行关联网络图分析。研究结果表明：手动操纵/飞行控制差错、缺少/不足的飞行培训和安全管理、飞行员之间沟通差错与程序执行错误是造成事故/征候的显著因素；关联规则能够有效利用航空安全报告信息，通过定量的方法挖掘事故/征候的特征，找到影响民航不安全事件的强关联因素，为民航安全管理人员提供决策依据。
Abstract:
In order to prevent the occurrence of the civil aviation unsafe incidents,the flight crew threats and errors management (TEM) model was applied to analyze the data from aviation safety reports on civil aviation accidents/incidents from 2014 to 2020.The latent conditions,threats and flight crew errors existing in the risk of civil aviation operation were extracted from the incidents,and the association relationship among them was mined through the improved association rule method,including mining the factors related to incident severity.The key factors in TEM model and the cause factors affecting the end states of aircraft were found out,and the association network diagram analysis was conducted.The results showed that the manual handling/flight control errors,lack/inadequate flight training and safety management,communication errors between pilots and program execution errors were the significant factors causing the accidents/incidents.The association rules could effectively make use of the aviation safety report information,mine the characteristics of accidents/incidents through quantitative methods,find the strong association factors affecting the civil aviation unsafe incidents,and provide decision-making basis for the civil aviation safety management personnel.

参考文献/References:

［1］周志鹏,诸泽宇.基于事件提取和改进MMHC的航空旅客运输事故征候贝叶斯网络建模［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(2):152-158. ZHOU Zhipeng,ZHU Zeyu.Bayesian network modeling of aviation passenger transport incident based on event extraction and improved MMHC［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2021,17(2):152-158.
［2］霍志勤,吕人力,史亚杰.民航运行中的威胁与差错管理［J］.中国安全科学学报,2007(12):60-65. HUO Zhiqin,LYU Renli,SHI Yajie.Threat and eror management in civil aviation operation［J］.China Safety Science Journal,2007(12):60-65.
［3］罗晓利,王一帆,李立民.机组资源管理［M］.成都：西南交通大学出版社，2012:137-147.
［4］罗渝川,韩新营,罗晓利.2006—2015年间中国民航事故及事故征候的统计分析［J］.中国民航飞行学院学报,2018,29(3):21-24，29. LUO Yuchuan，HAN Xinying，LUO Xiaoli.Statistic analysis based on accidents and incidents of China civil aviation during 2006—2015［J］.Journal of Civil Aviation Flight University of China,2018,29(3):21-24，29.
［5］International Air Transport Association.Safety Report 2020.［EB/OL］.(2021-03-25)［2022-04-24］.https://www.iata.org/en/publications/safety-report/.
［6］马明焕,王新浩,许晓辉,等.基于数据挖掘技术的事故隐患预警方法研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(7):11-17. MA Minghuan,WANG Xinhao,XU Xiaohui，et al.Research on early-warning method of potential safety hazard based on data mining techniques［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2017,13(7):11-17.
［7］刘文恒.公路穿村镇路段交通事故特征及事故致因深度分析［D］.北京:北京交通大学,2018.
［8］况宇琦,赵挺生,蒋灵,等.塔式起重机事故案例关联规则挖掘与分析［J］.中国安全科学学报,2021,31(7):137-142. KUANG Yuqi，ZHAO Tingsheng，JIANG Ling，et al.Mining and analysis of association rules in tower crane accident cases ［J］.China Safety Science Journal,2021,31(7):137-142.
［9］CHEN D J,PEI Y L,XIA Q.Research on human factors cause chain of ship accidents based on multidimensional association rules［J］.Ocean Engineering,2020,218:107717.
［10］ASHRAF M T,DEY K,MISHRA S,et al.Extracting rules from autonomous-vehicle-involved crashes by applying decision tree and association rule methods［J］.Transportation Research Record,2021,2675(11):522-533.
［11］陈俊.基于威胁与差错管理理论的安全管理系统设计［D］.成都：电子科技大学,2011.
［12］黄正.机组资源管理与飞行安全关系研究［J］.科技创新与应用,2017(35):125，127. HUANG Zheng.Research on the relationship between crew resource management and flight safety［J］.Technology Innovation and Application,2017(35):125,127.
［13］AGRAWAL R，IMIELINSKI T，SWAMI A.Database mining:a performance perspective［J］.Knowledge and Data Engineering，1993,5(6):914-925.
［14］郭聖煜,骆汉宾,滕哲,等.地铁施工工人不安全行为关联规则研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(10):185-190. GUO Shengyu,LUO Hanbin,TENG Zhe，et al.Research on association rules of unsafe behavior for metro construction workers［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2015,11(10):185-190.
［15］王琦,李霞.基于关联规则的分类规则约简方法［J］.计算机工程,2012,38(9):46-48. WANG Qi，LI Xia.Classification rule reduction method based on association rule［J］.Computer Engineering,2012,38(9):46-48.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2022-04-24
* 基金项目： 民航安全能力建设项目（ASSA2020/12）
作者简介： 袁乐平，硕士，副研究员，主要研究方向为航空人因工程。
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-11-13