[1]王正成,孙岩,毛海涛,等.不同除险加固方案下病险水库渗流特性研究 *[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(3):175-183.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.03.027]
WANG Zhengcheng,SUN Yan,MAO Haitao,et al.Study on seepage characteristics of dangerous reservoir under different reinforcement schemes[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(3):175-183.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.03.027]
点击复制
不同除险加固方案下病险水库渗流特性研究 *
WANG Zhengcheng,SUN Yan,MAO Haitao,et al.Study on seepage characteristics of dangerous reservoir under different reinforcement schemes[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(3):175-183.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.03.027]
《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]
- 卷:
- 18
- 期数:
- 2022年3期
- 页码:
- 175-183
- 栏目:
- 职业安全卫生管理与技术
- 出版日期:
- 2022-03-31
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Study on seepage characteristics of dangerous reservoir under different reinforcement schemes
- 文章编号:
- 1673-193X(2022)-03-0175-09
- 分类号:
- X959
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 为了给病险水库制定更加合理有效的除险加固方案。以某病险水库为研究对象，采用SEEP/W进行数值模拟，得出渗流量、出逸坡降、出逸流速、防渗墙底部渗透坡降，研究不同除险加固方案下水库的渗流特性。研究结果表明：未除险加固时，大坝渗流量、出逸坡降、出逸流速随着水位升高而增大；3种除险加固方案下，大坝渗流量、出逸坡降、出逸流速皆随着防渗墙深度的增大而降低，但防渗墙底部渗透坡降先降低后增大；大坝渗流量、出逸坡降、出逸流速相比加固前都显著降低，能满足控渗要求；值得注意的是，加固后防渗墙底部渗透坡降较大（0.429～2.17），应重点考虑。
- Abstract:
- In order to make a more reasonable and effective reinforcement scheme for the dangerous reservoir,taking a dangerous reservoir as the research object,the numerical simulation was carried out by SEEP/W.The seepage quantity,outflow gradient,outflow velocity and seepage gradient at the bottom of cutoff wall were calculated,and the seepage characteristics of dangerous reservoir under different reinforcement schemes were studied.The results showed that before the reinforcement,the seepage quantity,outflow gradient and outflow velocity of dam increased with the increased of water level.Under the three reinforcement schemes,all the seepage quantity,outflow gradient and outflow velocity of dam decreased with the increased depth of cutoff wall,but the seepage gradient at the bottom of cutoff wall decreased first and then increased.After adopting three reinforcement schemes,the seepage quantity,outflow gradient and outflow velocity of dam reduced significantly compared with those before reinforcement,which could meet the requirements of seepage control.It was worth noting that the seepage gradient at the bottom of cutoff wall was relatively large (0.429~2.17) after reinforcement,so it should be considered with emphasis.
参考文献/References:
［1］钮新强.水库病害特点及除险加固技术［J］.岩土工程学报,2010,32(1):153-157.NIU Xinqiang.Characteristics of reservoir defects and rehabilitation technology in China［J］.Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2010,32(1):153-157.
［2］YAN Z W,ZHANG Y Y,ZHANG G D.Present situation analysis for reinforcement of dangerous reservoirs in China［J］.Applied Mechanics & Materials,2013,405:2452-2456.
［3］HUANG J W,QIN J M,LU D L,et al.The evaluation model of dangerous reservoirs treatment［J］.Advanced Materials Research,2013,671(3):3044-3048.
［4］MA J,YANG J,LI S,et al.Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in the risk assessment of dangerous small-sized reservoirs［J］.International Journal of Machine Learning & Cybernetics,2018(9):113-123.
［5］XU W,GUO W,YU H,et al.Research on dangerous reservoir analysis and management system［J］.Procedia Engineering,2012,29:474-478.
［6］沈振中,甘磊,徐力群,等.病险水库除险加固效果的量化评价模型［J］.水利水电科技进展,2018,38(5):10-14,80.SHEN Zhenzhong,GAN Lei,XU Liqun,et al.Quantitative evaluation model of reinforcement effect for dangerous reservoirs［J］.Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources,2018,38(5):10-14,80.
［7］蒋清华,马福恒,向衍.病险水库大坝风险预警系统架构初探［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2006(6):49-52.JIANG Qinghua,MA Fuheng,XIANG Yan.Preliminary study on the framework of dam risk early-warning system on ill reservoir［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2006(6):49-52.
［8］杨杰,郑成成,江德军,等.病险水库理论分析研究进展［J］.水科学进展,2014,25(1):148-154.YANG Jie,ZHENG Chengcheng,JIANG Dejun,et al.Research advances in risk assessment and enforcement of unsafe reservoirs［J］.Advances in Water Resource,2014,25(1):148-154.
［9］胡江,苏怀智.基于生命质量指数的病险水库除险加固效应评价方法［J］.水利学报,2012,43(7):852-859,868.HU Jiang,SU Huaizhi.Quantitative evaluation framework of reinforcement based on the LQI for dangerous dams ［J］.Shuili Xuebao,2012,43(7):852-859,868.
［10］林赛.非开挖顶管施工技术在病险水库加固工程中的应用［J］.水利水电技术,2015,46(3):57-60.LIN Sai.Application of non excavation pipe jacking construction technology to strengthening of defective and dangerous reservoir［J］.Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering,2015,46(3):57-60.
［11］袁明道,潘展钊,吕文丽.围井试验法在病险水库高压喷射灌浆工程中的应用及其关键点初探［J］.南水北调与水利科技,2010,8(5):167-170.YUAN Mingdao,PAN Zhanzhao,LYU Wenli.Application and the key points of enclosure well test to high-pressure jet grouting project in dangerous reservoirs［J］.South-to North Transfers and Water Science & Technology,2010,8(5):167-170.
［12］盛金保,沈登乐,傅忠友.我国病险水库分类和除险技术［J］.水利水运工程学报,2009(4):116-12.SHENG Jinbao,SHEN Dengle,FU Zhongyou.Classification and rehabilitation of defective dams in China［J］.Hydro-science and Engineering,2009(4):116-121.
［13］刘泽,章光,李伟林,等.基于MIC-BBO-SVM的大坝渗流预测模型［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(11):12-18.LIU Ze,ZHANG Guang,LI Weilin,et al.Prediction model of dam seepage based on MIC-BBO-SVM［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2020,16(11):12-18.
［14］水利部大坝安全管理中心.水库大坝安全评价导则:SL258—2017［S］.北京:中国水利水电出版社,2017.
相似文献/References:
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
-
收稿日期： 2021-06-08
* 基金项目： 国家自然科学基金项目（41602367）；重庆市科委基础与前沿研究计划项目（cstc2018jcyjA，cstc2019jcyj-msxm1330）；重庆市教委科学技术研究项目（KJQN202001210，KJQN201901240，KJQN201901209，KJQN201901209）
作者简介： 王正成，硕士，实验师，主要研究方向为土石坝渗流机理。
通信作者： 毛海涛，博士，教授，主要研究方向为水工建筑物渗流机理。
