|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]代雪,张家明.某场地边坡稳定分析方法的比较研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(11):119-124.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.11.018]
　DAI Xue,ZHANG Jiaming.Comparative study on analysis methods of slope stability at a certain site[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2021,17(11):119-124.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.11.018]
点击复制

某场地边坡稳定分析方法的比较研究*
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
17
期数:
2021年11期
页码:
119-124
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2021-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative study on analysis methods of slope stability at a certain site
文章编号:
1673-193X(2021)-11-0119-06
作者:
代雪; 张家明
（1.昆明理工大学 国土资源工程学院，云南 昆明 650500；
2.昆明理工大学 建筑工程学院，云南 昆明 650500）
Author(s):
DAI Xue;  ZHANG Jiaming
(1.Faculty of Land Resource Engineering，Kunming University of Science and Technology，Kunming Yunnan 650500，China；
2.Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics，Kunming University of Science and Technology，Kunming Yunnan 650500，China）
关键词:
高填方边坡; 直立边坡; M-P法; Bishop法; 强度折减法; 边坡稳定分析
Keywords:
high fill slope;  vertical slope;  M-P method;  Bishop method;  strength reduction method;  slope stability analysis
分类号:
X947
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.11.018
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了对边坡稳定性分析方法进行研究，以某场地高填方边坡和直立边坡为研究对象，基于Geostudio、理正软件以及ANSYS软件，采用M-P法、Bishop法和强度折减法进行边坡稳定分析。结果表明：高填方边坡安全系数为1.3，为稳定边坡；AB，BC，CD段地块间边坡边坡安全系数依次为0.479，0.410，0.381，基坑边坡安全系数为0.436，均为不稳定边坡；其中，M-P法得到的安全系数偏保守，Bishop法得到的安全系数结果较可靠，强度折减法得到的结果最为理想。研究结果可为边坡稳定性研究与治理提供借鉴。
Abstract:
In order to study the slope stability analysis methods,the High Fill Slope and Vertical Slope of a site are taken as the research objects.Based on Geostudio,Lizheng and ANSYS software,M-P Method,Bishop Method and Strength Reduction Method are used for slope stability analysis.The results show that the Safety Factor of High Fill Slope is 1.3,which is a stable slope ; the Safety Factors of Landmass Slopes in AB,BC，CD sections are 0.479,0.410，0.381 respectively,which are all unstable slopes.The Safety Factor of foundation pit slope is 0.436,which is unstable slope.Among them,the Safety Factors obtained by M-P Method are conservative,the Safety Factors obtained by Bishop Method are reliable,and the Strength Reduction Method is the most ideal.The research results can provide reference for slope stability research and control.

参考文献/References:

［1］倪武杰.土质边坡破坏机理及稳定性研究［D］.西安:长安大学,2010.
［2］董杰华,黄浩,徐中来,等.基于ABAQUS的坡地边坡稳定性影响因素敏感性分析［J］.煤炭技术,2021,40(1):62-65. DONG Jiehua,HUANG Hao,XU Zhonglai,et al.Sensitivity analysis of factors affecting slope stability based on ABAQUS［J］.Coal Technology,2021,40(1):62-65.
［3］唐高朋,李亮,赵炼恒,等.非线性破坏准则下边坡稳定性极限分析斜条分法［J］.岩土力学,2015,36(7):2063-2072. TANG Gaopeng,LI Liang,ZHAO Lianheng,et al.Slope stability limit analysis under nonlinear failure criterion ［J］.Rock and Soil Mechanics,2015,36(7):2063-2072.
［4］王玉平,曾志强,潘树林.边坡稳定性分析方法综述［J］.西华大学学报(自然科学版),2012,31(2):101-105. WANG Yuping,ZENG Zhiqiang,PAN Shulin.Summary of slope stability analysis methods［J］.Journal of Xihua University (Natural Science Edition),2012,31(2):101-105.
［5］李春辉,刘天鹏,王洪洋,等.边坡稳定性分析方法研究进展及展望［J］.东北水利水电,2020,38(2):63-65. LI Chunhui,LIU Tianpeng,WANG Hongyang,et al.Research progress and prospects of slope stability analysis methods［J］.Northeast Water Resources and Hydropower,2020,38(2):63-65.
［6］高玉峰,王迪,张飞.三维土质边坡稳定性分析方法研究现状与展望［J］.河海大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(5):456-464. GAO Yufeng,WANG Di,ZHANG Fei.Research status and prospects of three-dimensional soil slope stability analysis methods［J］.Journal of Hohai University (Natural Science Edition),2015,43(5):456-464.
［7］赵炼恒,曹景源,唐高朋,等.基于双强度折减策略的边坡稳定性分析方法探讨［J］.岩土力学,2014,35(10):2977-2984. ZHAO Lianheng,CAO Jingyuan,TANG Gaopeng,et al.Discussion on slope stability analysis method based on dual strength reduction strategy［J］.Rock and Soil Mechanics,2014,35(10):2977-2984.
［8］史恒通,王成华.土坡有限元稳定分析若干问题探讨［J］.岩土力学,2000(2):152-155. SHI Hengtong,WANG Chenghua.Discussion on some problems of soil slope finite element stability analysis［J］.Rock and Soil Mechanics,2000(2):152-155.
［9］咸玉建,陈学军,汪志刚,等.基于有限元强度折减系数法岩土边坡稳定性分析与抗滑桩设计［J］.地质科技情报,2015,34(4):176-182. XIAN Yujian,CHEN Xuejun,WANG Zhigang,et al.Rocksoil slope stability analysis andanti slide pile design based on finite elementstrength reduction coefficient method［J］.Geological Science and Technology Information,2015,34(4):176-182.
［10］黄诗渊,刘健,徐静,等.稳定性分析方法对均质土坡计算结果的影响［J］.五邑大学学报(自然科学版),2014,28(4):43-48. HUANG Shiyuan,LIU Jian,XU Jing,et al.The influence of stability analysis methods on the calculation results of homogeneous soil slopes［J］.Journal of Wuyi University (Natural Science Edition),2014,28(4):43-48.
［11］杨正玉,刘顺青,崔雨.有限元极限平衡法与强度折减法在边坡稳定性分析中的对比［J］.水科学与工程技术,2020(1):74-76. YANG Zhengyu,LIU Shunqing,CUI Yu.Comparison of finite element limit equilibrium method and strength reduction method in slope stability analysis［J］.Water Science and Engineering Technology,2020(1):74-76.
［12］毕小勇,闫天俊,鲁杰.Midas-GTS(SRM)在边坡二维稳定性分析中的运用［J］.自然灾害学报,2015,24(1):170-176. BI Xiaoyong,YAN Tianjun,LU Jie.Application of Midas GTS (SRM) in slope stability analysis［J］.Journal of Natural Disasters,2015,24(1):170-176.
［13］孙红月,吕庆.高填方路基诱发滑坡机理分析［J］.自然灾害学报,2006(5):168-171. SUN Hongyue,LYU Qing.Mechanism analysis of landslide induced by high filled roadbed［J］.Journal of Natural Disasters,2006(5):168-171.
［14］白云峰,周德培,王科,等.顺层滑坡的发育环境及分布特征［J］.自然灾害学报,2004(3):39-43. BAI Yunfeng,ZHOU Depei,WANG Ke,et al.Development environment and distribution characteristics of bedding landslides［J］.Journal of Natural Disasters,2004(3):39-43.
［15］张东明,李剑锋,王燕增.小南海崩滑体稳定性分析及防治措施［J］.自然灾害学报,2010,19(3):27-30. ZHANG Dongming,LI Jianfeng,WANG Yanzeng.Stability analysis and prevention measure-s of landslide in Xiaonanhai［J］.Journal of Natural Disasters,2010,19(3):27-30.
［16］罗丽娟,赵法锁.滑坡防治工程措施研究现状与应用综述［J］.自然灾害学报,2009,18(4):158-164. LUO Lijuan,ZHAO Fasuo.Summary of research status and application of landslide prevention engineering measures［J］.Journal of Natural Disasters,2009,18(4):158-164.
［17］杨晓娟,郑俊.基于SLOPEP/W的某水电站库首右岸高边坡的稳定性评价［J］.吉林水利,2009(9):16-18. YANG Xiaojuan,ZHENG Jun.Stability evaluation of high slope on the right bank of a h-ydropower station head based on SLOPEP/W［J］.Jilin Water Conservancy,2009(9):16-18.
［18］李春光,朱宇飞,刘丰,等.基于下限原理有限元的强度折减法［J］.岩土力学,2012,33(6):1816-1821. LI Chunguang,ZHU Yufei,LIU Feng,et al.The strength reduction method based on the lower limit principle finite element［J］.Geotechnical Mechanics,2012,33(6):1816-1821.
［19］《工程地质手册》编委会编.工程地质手册第4版［M］.北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2007.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2021-09-10；网络首发日期： 2021-11-26
* 基金项目： 国家自然科学基金项目（41807258）；中国有色金属工业昆明勘察设计研究院有限公司科技创新项目（2019YN05）
作者简介： 代雪，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为工程勘察与防治。
通信作者： 张家明，博士，讲师，主要研究方向为复杂高陡边坡失稳机理及防治。
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-12-08