|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]朱清华,胡甚平,田力,等.基于二维灰云模型的LNG动力船航行过程风险推理*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(6):180-186.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.06.029]
 ZHU Qinghua,HU Shenping,TIAN Li,et al.Risk reasoning on navigation process of LNG-fueled ship based on two-dimensional gray cloud model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2021,17(6):180-186.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.06.029]
点击复制

基于二维灰云模型的LNG动力船航行过程风险推理*
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
17
期数:
2021年6期
页码:
180-186
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2021-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Risk reasoning on navigation process of LNG-fueled ship based on two-dimensional gray cloud model
文章编号:
1673-193X(2021)-06-0180-07
作者:
朱清华胡甚平田力李文晶
(上海海事大学 商船学院,上海 201306)
Author(s):
ZHU Qinghua HU Shenping TIAN Li LI Wenjing
(Merchant Marine College,Shanghai Maritime University,Shanghai 201306,China)
关键词:
LNG动力船二维灰云模型云推理风险评估
Keywords:
LNG-fueled ship two-dimensional gray cloud model cloud reasoning risk assessment
分类号:
X945
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.06.029
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对风险多维属性问题及船舶航行多种风险表现,提出基于二维灰云模型的LNG动力船航行过程风险推理方法。针对LNG使用及船舶航行2种作业方式,采用系统方法识别安全风险影响因素体系,确定2种作业方式下各风险体系指标变化权重,描述LNG动力船航行过程中LNG使用和船舶航行发生事故概率及后果;通过引入云模型,综合计算2种作业方式下概率及后果组合风险,并采用灰云推理2种作业方式同时存在时LNG动力船航行过程风险。结果表明:LNG动力船航行过程中LNG使用和船舶航行风险耦合,风险程度受控;二维灰云模型可有效分析多维属性下风险评估问题,以及不同作业下风险耦合作用。研究结果可为船舶航行过程风险定量评估提供依据。
Abstract:
Aiming at the problem of multi-dimensional attributes of risk and the performance when facing multiple risks during the ship navigation,a risk reasoning method for the navigation process of LNG-fueled ship based on the two-dimensional gray cloud model was proposed.Firstly,aiming at two operation modes of LNG usage and ship navigation during the navigation process of LNG-fueled ship,the systematic method was adopted to identify the influencing factor system forming the safety risk,then the change weights of indexes under each risk system under the two modes were determined,and the probabilities and consequences of LNG and ship accidents during the navigation process of LNG-fueled ship were described.Secondly,the cloud model was introduced to comprehensively calculate the combined risk of probability and consequence under the two operating tasks.Finally,the gray cloud reasoning rules were used to reason the risk in the navigation process of LNG-fueled ship when the two operating modes coexisted.The data application showed that the risks of LNG usage and ship navigation during the navigation process of LNG-fueled ship were coupled,and the risk degree was controlled.The two-dimensional gray cloud model can effectively analyze the risk assessment problem under the multi-dimensional attributes,and can also analyze the risk coupling effect under different operations.

参考文献/References:

[1]郭宗华,程玉排,田红梅.小型LNG气化站的过程安全和事故过程安全[J].煤气与热力,2018,38(1):28-33. GUO Zonghua,CHENG Yupai,TIAN Hongmei.Process safety and accident process safety of LNG gasification station[J].Gas and Heat,2018,38(1):28-33.
[2]ABDUSSAMIE N,DABOOS M,ELFERJANI I,et al.Risk assessment of LNG and FLNG vessels during manoeuvring in open sea[J].Journal of Ocean Engineering & Science,2017,3(1):55-66.
[3]YEO C T,BHANDARI J,ABBASSI R,et al.Dynamic Risk Analysis of Offloading Process in Floating Liquefied Natural Gas (FLNG) Platform Using Bayesian Network[J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2016(41):259-269.
[4]IANNACCONE T,LANDUCCI G,SCARPONI G E,et al.Inherent safety assessment of alternative technologies for LNG ships bunkering[J].Ocean Engineering,2019,185(8):100-114.
[5]ANIMAH I,SHAFIEE M.Application of risk analysis in the liquefied natural gas (LNG) sector:An overview [J].Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2020,63:1-14.
[6]JEONG B,LEE B S,ZHOU P L.Quantitative risk assessment of fuel preparation room having high-pressure fuel gas supply system for LNG fueled ship[J].Ocean Engineering,2017,137:450-468.
[7]LIU C Y,LI D Y,PAN L L.Uncertain knowledge representation based on cloud model [J].Computers Engineering and Applications.2004,40(2):32-35.
[8]姜增国,吴壮,张孝千.基于二维云模型的桥梁施工风险评估[J].武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版),2019,43(2):218-221. JIANG Zengguo,WU Zhuang,ZHANG Xiaoqian.Risk assessment of bridge construction based on two-dimensional cloud model [J].Journal of Wuhan University of Technology,2019,43(2):218-221.
[9]徐征捷,张友鹏,苏宏升.基于云模型的模糊综合评判法在风险评估中的应用[J].安全与环境学报,2014,14(2):69-72. XU Zhengjie,ZHANG Youpeng,SU Hongsheng.Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method based on cloud model in risk assessment [J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2014,14(2):69-72.
[10]王洪利,冯玉强.基于灰云的改进白化模型及其在灰色决策中应用[J].黑龙江大学自然科学学报,2006,23(6):740-750. WANG Hongli,FENG Yuqiang.Improved whitening model based on gray cloud and its application in gray decision-making [J].Journal of Natural Science of Heilongjiang University,2006,23(6):740-750.
[11]胡甚平,黎法明,席永涛,等.海上交通系统风险成因耦合机理仿真[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2015(2):409-419. HU Shenping,LI Faming,XI Yongtao,et al.Simulation of the coupling mechanism of risk formation in marine transportation system[J].Journal of Basic Science andEngineering,2015(2):409-419.
[12]WU Y N,WANG J,JI S Y,et al.Renewable energy investment risk assessment for nations along China’s Belt & Road Initiative:an ANP-cloud model method[J].Energy,2020,190:1-19.
[13]李德毅,孟海军,史雪梅.隶属云和隶属云发生器[J].计算机研究与发展,1995(6):15-20. LI Deyi,MENG Haijun,SHI Xuemei.Affiliated cloud and affiliated cloud generator[J].Computer R & D,1995(6):15-20.
[14]李晓松,王成志,陈庆华.基于云推理模型的武器装备研制风险评估研究[J].运筹与管理,2011,20(3):111-118. LI Xiaosong,WANG Chengzhi,CHEN Qinghua.Research on weapon equipment risk assessment based on cloud reasoning model[J].Operation Search and Management Science,2011,20(3):111-118.
[15]龚慧佳,轩少永,胡甚平,等.基于灰云模型的海上交通系统风险推理方法[J].中国航海(2):87-91. GONG Huijia,XUAN Shaoyong,HU Shenping,et al.Reasoning method for risk in marine traffic system based on gray cloud[J].Navigation of China,(2):87-91.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2021-03-11
* 基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFB1600602);上海市2020年度“科技创新行动计划”软科学重点项目(20692108700)
作者简介: 朱清华,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为交通信息工程及控制。
通信作者: 胡甚平,博士,教授,主要研究方向为载运工具运用工程,安全工程,风险管理。
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-07-07