|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张俭让,王智鹏.基于多元线性回归的煤矿驾驶员情绪预测模型*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(11):147-152.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.11.023]
　ZHANG Jianrang,WANG Zhipeng.Prediction model for emotion of coalmine drivers based on multiple linear regression[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(11):147-152.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.11.023]
点击复制

基于多元线性回归的煤矿驾驶员情绪预测模型*
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
16
期数:
2020年11期
页码:
147-152
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2020-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Prediction model for emotion of coalmine drivers based on multiple linear regression
文章编号:
1673-193X(2020)-11-0147-06
作者:
张俭让; 王智鹏
（1.西安科技大学 安全科学与工程学院，陕西 西安 710054；
2.教育部西部矿井开采及灾害防治重点实验室，陕西 西安 710054)
Author(s):
ZHANG Jianrang;  WANG Zhipeng
(1.College of Safety Science and Engineering,Xi’an University of Science and Technology,Xi’an Shaanxi 710054,China;
2.Key laboratory of Western Mine Exploitation and Hazard Prevention of Ministry of Education,Xi’an Shaanxi 710054,China)
关键词:
煤矿驾驶员; 情绪监测; 多元回归分析; 眼动指标
Keywords:
coal mine driver;  emotion monitoring;  multiple regression analysis;  eye movement index
分类号:
X936
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.11.023
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为研究煤矿人车驾驶员情绪状态不良引发的煤矿驾驶事故问题，设计眼动实验并建立基于多元线性回归的驾驶员情绪状况预测模型对驾驶员情绪状况进行预测；通过眼动仪采集煤矿驾驶员良好情绪与不良情绪状态下的各项眼动指标，记录其主观情绪状态；使用多元线性回归方程对数据进行分析与建模，采用平均相对误差对预测模型进行评估。结果表明：每秒注视点个数、平均扫视速度、反应时间、危险源辨识个数在情绪变化前后存在显著差异，且与情绪状态呈较强相关；基于多元线性回归的驾驶员情绪状况预测模型预测精度较高，平均相对误差为8.16%。模型适用于煤矿人车驾驶员的情绪监测，可为煤矿驾驶员安全行驶提供保障。
Abstract:
In order to study the problem of coal mine driving accidents caused by the bad emotional state of coal mine drivers,the eye movement experiment was designed,and a prediction model for the emotional state of drivers based on the multiple linear regression was established to predict the drivers’ emotional state.Various eye movement indexes of coal mine drivers under the good and bad emotional states were collected by the eye tracker,and their subjective emotional states were recorded.The multiple linear regression equations were used to analyze and model the data,and the average relative error was used to evaluate the prediction model.The results showed that the number of fixation points per second,average scanning speed,reaction time and risk identification number were significantly different before and after the emotional change,and were strongly correlated with the emotional state.The prediction model of drivers’ emotional state based on the multiple linear regression had a higher prediction accuracy,with an average relative error of 8.16%.It can be seen that the model is suitable for the emotion monitoring of drivers in the coal mine,and provides guarantee for the safe driving of coal mine drivers.

参考文献/References:

［1］刘文涛.煤矿辅助运输车辆实时监控系统设计［J］.工矿自动化,2014,40(10):68-71. LIU Wentao.Design of real-time monitoring system of auxiliary transportation vehicle in coal mine ［J］.Industry and Mine Automation,2014,40(10):68-71.
［2］陈麒元.驾驶员的情绪状态对其驾驶行为的影响［D］.杭州:浙江工业大学,2014.
［3］乔春玲,常若松,潘留栓,等.偶然情绪对驾驶决策的影响［J］.人类工效学,2017,23(3):81-86. QIAO Chunling,CHANG Ruosong,PAN Liushuan，et al.The influence of occasional emotions on driving decisions ［J］.Chinese Journal of Ergonomics,2017,23(3):81-86.
［4］胡月琦,朱彤,李金檑,等.特长隧道环境下驾驶人注视转移特性研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(8):42-48. HU Yueqi,ZHU Tong,LI Jinlei，et al.Research on fixation transition characteristics of drivers in extra-long tunnel ［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2017,13(8):42-48.
［5］UNDERWOOD G.Visual attention and the transition from novice to advanced driver ［J］.Ergonomics,2007,50(8):1235-1249.
［6］JENNIFER M C,KANE M J.Conducting the train of thought:working memory capacity,goal neglect,and mind wandering in an executive-control task ［J］.Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning,Memory,and Cognition,2009,35(1):196-204.
［7］万平,吴超仲,马晓凤.基于ROC曲线和驾驶行为特征的驾驶愤怒强度判别阈值［J］.吉林大学学报(工学版),2020,50(1):121-131. WAN Ping,WU Chaozhong,MA Xiaofeng.Discriminating threshold of driving anger intensity based on driving behavior features by ROC curve analysis ［J］.Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition),2020,50(1):121-131.
［8］李乃文,李倩文,李玉涵.工作不安全感、情绪耗竭与安全注意力的关系［J］.科技促进发展,2019,15(8):872-877. LI Naiwen,LI Qianwen,LI Yuhan.Relationship between job insecurity,emotional exhaustion and safe attention ［J］.Science & Technology for Development,2019,15(8):872-877.
［9］邢宝君,唐水清,李乃文,等.人因脆弱性对安全注意力衰减的SEM研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(10):158-163. XING Baojun,TANG Shuiqing,LI Naiwen,et al.SEM study on safety attention attenuation due to human vulnerability ［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2017,13(10):158-163.
［10］SCOTT-PARKER B.Emotions,behaviour,and the adolescent driver:a literature review ［J］.Transportation Research Part F:Psychology and Behaviour,2017,50：1-37.
［11］刘朝.情绪表现规则和情绪劳动对消极工作行为影响跨层次研究［D］.长沙:湖南大学,2013.
［12］李之红.基于实车眼动实验的驾驶员注视行为建模分析［J］.科学技术与工程,2018,18(11):312-317. LI Zhihong.Modeling analyses on driver’s gazing behavior based on real vehicle eye movement experiment ［J］.Science Technology and Engineering,2018,18(11):312-317.
［13］杨运兴,陈芳.山区高速公路空间郁闭度对驾驶员视觉及生理指标的影响［J］.安全与环境学报,2019,19(3):881-886. YANG Yunxing,CHEN Fang.Influence of the spatial canopy density on the driver’s visual and physiological indexes when driving in the mountainous highway［J］.Journal of Safety and Environment，2019,19(3):881-886.
［14］吴兴刚.基于驾驶员情绪识别的汽车灯光音效调节方法研究［D］.长春:吉林大学,2019.
［15］田水承,郭方艺,杨鹏飞.不良情绪对胶轮车驾驶员不安全行为的影响研究［J］.矿业安全与保,2018,45(5):115-119,125. TIAN Shuicheng,GUO Fangyi,YANG Pengfei.Research on the effect of bad emotion on unsafe behavior of drivers of rubber-tyred car ［J］.Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2018,45(5):115-119,125.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2020-06-17
* 基金项目： 国家自然科学基金项目(61902311)；陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(2019JLZ-08)
作者简介： 张俭让，硕士，教授，主要研究方向为安全理论和矿山灾害防治。
通信作者： 王智鹏，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为安全理论和矿山灾害防治。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-12-06