|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张宪尚.常用经验模型预测煤屑瓦斯解吸量对比分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(9):20-25.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.09.003]
　ZHANG Xianshang.Comparative analysis on gas desorption prediction of coal cuttings based on common empirical models[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(9):20-25.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.09.003]
点击复制

常用经验模型预测煤屑瓦斯解吸量对比分析
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
15
期数:
2019年9期
页码:
20-25
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2019-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative analysis on gas desorption prediction of coal cuttings based on common empirical models
文章编号:
1673-193X(2019)-09-0020-06
作者:
张宪尚1; 2; 3
（1.瓦斯灾害监控与应急技术国家重点实验室，重庆 400037；
2.中煤科工集团重庆研究院有限公司，重庆 400037；
3.四川大学，四川 成都 610065）
Author(s):
ZHANG Xianshang1; 2; 3
(1.State Key Laboratory of Gas Disaster Detecting,Preventing and Emergency Controlling,Chongqing 400037,China;
2.China Coal Technology and Engineering Group Chongqing Research Institute,Chongqing 400037,China;
3.Sichuan University,Chengdu Sichuan 610065,China)
关键词:
经验模型; 瓦斯解吸; 解吸量预测; 解吸时间
Keywords:
empirical model;  gas desorption;  desorption prediction;  desorption time
分类号:
X936；TD82
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.09.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为研究常用瓦斯解吸经验模型对解吸量预测准确性，基于容量法试验测定长时间的煤屑瓦斯累计解吸量，通过截取不同时段的瓦斯解吸量数据回归拟合得到常用解吸经验模型参数，并将其代入模型中计算出瓦斯解吸量与试验测定量进行对比。研究结果表明：各常用经验模型公式对不同时间段数据拟合都表现出较好的效果；巴雷尔式不适合用于煤屑的瓦斯解吸预测；指数型经验模型公式计算得到曲线受制于拟合数据时间段长短，在拟合时间段后很快趋于平直而低估累计瓦斯解吸量；乌斯季诺夫式适合用于短时间煤屑瓦斯解吸数据推算长期瓦斯解吸量；重庆-文特式适合用于预测短期瓦斯解吸量，而利用较长时间段瓦斯解吸量数据推算煤屑瓦斯解吸量宜采用艾黎式。该研究成果对于煤的瓦斯涌出及煤层气产能预测有着重要实际意义。
Abstract:
In order to study the accuracy of common empirical models for the gas desorption prediction,the cumulative amount of gas desorption of coal cuttings for a long time was measured based on the volumetric method test.The parameters of the common empirical models were obtained by regression fitting on the data of gas desorption intercepted in different time periods,and they were substituted into the models to calculate the gas desorption amount,which were compared with the experimental measured data.The results showed that the formulas of common empirical models presented good effect for data fitting in different time periods.The Barrer formula was not suitable for predicting gas desorption of coal cuttings.The curves calculated by the empirical model formula of exponential type were restrained by time length of fitting data,and tended to be flat quickly after the fitting time period,so the cumulative amount of gas desorption was underestimated.The Ustinov formula was suitable for calculating the longterm gas desorption amount by using the shortterm gas desorption data of coal cuttings,and the ChongqingVenter formula was suitable for predicting the shortterm gas desorption amount,while the Airey formula was good at calculating the gas desorption amount of coal cuttings by using the data of gas desorption amount in a relative long time period.The research results have important practical significance for predicting the coal gas emission and CBM productivity.

参考文献/References:

［1］ZHAO W,CHENG Y,JIANG H,et al.Role of the rapid gas desorption of coal powders in the development stage of outbursts［J］.Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2016,28:491-501.
［2］YANG D,CHEN Y,TANG J,et al.Experimental research into the relationship between initial gas release and coal-gas outbursts［J］.Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering,2018,50:157-165.
［3］YUAN L.Theory and practice of integrated coal production and gas extraction［J］.International Journal of Coal Science & Technology,2015,2(1):3-11.
［4］XUE S,YUAN L.The use of coal cuttings from underground boreholes to determine gas content of coal with direct desorption method［J］.International Journal of Coal Geology,2017,174:1-7.
［5］BARRER R M.Diffusion in and through solids［M］.London:Cambridge University Press,1951.
［6］AIREY E.Gas emission from broken coal.An experimental and theoretical investigation［C］//International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts,1968:475-494.
［7］BOLT B,INNES J.Diffusion of carbon dioxide from coal［J］.Fuel,1959,38(3):333-337.
［8］孙重旭.煤样解吸瓦斯泄出的研究及其突出煤层煤样瓦斯解吸的特点［C］//煤与瓦斯突出第三次学术论文选集,重庆:重庆煤炭研究所,1983.
［9］王佑安,杨思敬.煤和瓦斯突出危险煤层的某些特征［J］.煤炭学报,1980,5(1):47-53.WANG Youan,YANG Sijing.Some features of coal and gas outburst coal seams［J］.Chinese Journal of Coal,1980,5(1):47-53.
［10］宋世钊.煤矿沼气涌出［M］.北京:煤炭工业出版社,1983.
［11］邵军.关于煤屑瓦斯解吸经验公式的探讨［J］.煤炭工程师,1989(3):21-27.
［12］杨其銮.煤屑瓦斯放散随时间变化规律的初步探讨［J］.煤矿安全,1986(4):3-11.
［13］温志辉.构造煤瓦斯解吸规律的实验研究［D］.焦作:河南理工大学,2008.
［14］富向,王魁军,杨宏伟,等.煤粒瓦斯放散规律数学模型的应用［J］.煤矿安全,2006,37(12):1-3.FU Xiang,WANG Kuijun,YANG Hongwei,et al.Application of methane diffusion law mathematical model of coal particle［J］.Coal Safety,2006,37(12):1-3.
［15］马东民.煤层气吸附解吸机理研究［D］.西安:西安科技大学,2008.
［16］ZHANG D.A coefficient of determination for generalized linear models［J］.The American Statistician,2017,71(4):310-316.
［17］张逸斌,齐庆杰,张浪,等.煤体结构对瓦斯解吸放散特征影响试验研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(6):103-107.ZHANG Yibin,QI Qingjie,ZHANG Lang,et al.Experimental study on influence of coal structure on gas desorption and emission characteristics［J］.Journal of Safety Scienceand Technology,2018,14(6):103-107.

相似文献/References:

[1]李红涛,齐黎明,陈学习.密闭液封堵条件下的瓦斯解吸规律实验研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(3):18.
　LI Hong tao,QI Li ming,CHNE Xue xi.Experiment research on the gas desorption rule of sealing fluid enveloping coal core[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(9):18.
[2]王登科,王洪磊,魏建平.颗粒煤的多扩散系数瓦斯解吸模型及扩散参数反演研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(7):10.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.07.002]
　WANG Dengke,WANG Honglei,WEI Jianping.Multi-diffusion coefficient model and diffusion parameter inversion of gas desorption for coal particles[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(9):10.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.07.002]
[3]张逸斌,齐庆杰,张浪,等.煤体结构对瓦斯解吸放散特征影响试验研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(6):103.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.06.016]
　ZHANG Yibin,QI Qingjie,ZHANG Lang,et al.Experimental study on influence of coal structure on gas desorption and emission characteristics[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(9):103.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.06.016]
[4]杨涛,顾勇攀,戴林超,等.铁磁流体对煤粒瓦斯解吸性能影响实验研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(11):117.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.11.018]
　YANG Tao,GU Yongpan,DAI Linchao,et al.Experimental study on influence of ferrofluid on gas desorption performance of coal particles[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(9):117.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.11.018]
[5]司莎莎,王兆丰,刘帅强,等.冷冻取芯过程煤芯瓦斯解吸特性试验研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(5):122.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.05.019]
　SI Shasha,WANG Zhaofeng,LIU Shuaiqiang,et al.Experimental study on gas desorption characteristics of coal core in frozen coring process[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(9):122.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.05.019]
[6]迟明华,蒋宏业,吕超,等.输气管道高后果区蒸气云爆炸超压预测方法探究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2023,19(4):121.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.04.017]
　CHI Minghua,JIANG Hongye,LYU Chao,et al.Study on overpressure prediction method of vapor cloud explosion in high-consequence area of gas pipeline[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2023,19(9):121.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.04.017]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2019-07-17
* 基金项目： 国家重点研发计划项目（2018YFC0808001）
作者简介： 张宪尚，硕士研究生，助理研究员，主要研究方向为煤岩瓦斯动力灾害防治。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-10-15