|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]吴伟东,苟唐巧,许博浩,等.基于改进PPC模型的铁路弃渣场综合风险评价系统[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(8):181-186.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.08.029]
　WU Weidong,GOU Tangqiao,XU Bohao,et al.Comprehensive risk assessment system for railway abandoned dreg site based on improved PPC model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(8):181-186.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.08.029]
点击复制

基于改进PPC模型的铁路弃渣场综合风险评价系统
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
15
期数:
2019年8期
页码:
181-186
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2019-08-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comprehensive risk assessment system for railway abandoned dreg site based on improved PPC model
文章编号:
1673-193X(2019)-08-0181-06
作者:
吴伟东; 苟唐巧; 许博浩; 潘海泽; 何鑫
（西南石油大学 土木工程与建筑学院，四川 成都 610500）
Author(s):
WU Weidong; GOU Tangqiao; XU Bohao; PAN Haize; HE Xin
(School of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu Sichuan 610500,China)
关键词:
铁路弃渣场; 风险评价; 改进投影寻踪聚类（PPC）模型; 遗传算法（GA）; 投影方向
Keywords:
railway abandoned dreg site;  risk assessment;  improved projection pursuit clustering (PPC) model;  genetic algorithm (GA);  projection direction
分类号:
X928.03
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.08.029
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了客观准确地评估铁路弃渣场的综合风险，建立基于改进投影寻踪聚类（PPC）模型的风险评价模型。首先建立了6个维度共19个因素的指标体系，并制定相应评价标准；然后借鉴K均值聚类思想来确定PPC模型关键系数-密度窗宽R，以解决传统方法造成的聚类效果差等问题；同时将遗传算法（GA）作为模型优化算法得到最优投影方向和样本投影值等关键数据；最后以贵昆线铁路的10座弃渣场作为案例研究，研究结果表明：“弃渣场边坡条件”和“地形与地基条件”2个维度对弃渣场的综合风险影响最大；验证了所建模型的科学性，评价结果能够规避人为主观因素的干扰，更加与实际情况相贴合。
Abstract:
In order to objectively and accurately evaluate the comprehensive risk of railway abandoned dreg site,a risk assessment model based on the improved projection pursuit clustering (PPC) model was established.Firstly,an index system involving 19 factors in 6 dimensions was established,and the corresponding evaluation criteria were formulated.Then,the key coefficient of PPC model,the window radius R of local density,was determined by using the Kmeans clustering method,so as to solve the problems such as poor clustering effect caused by traditional methods.At the same time,the genetic algorithm (GA) was used as the model optimization algorithm to obtain the key data such as the optimum projection direction and sample projection value.Finally,ten abandoned dreg sites of GuizhouKunming railway were used as the case studies.The results showed that the two dimensions of “slope condition” and “topography and foundation condition” had the greatest influence on the comprehensive risk of abandoned dreg site.The scientific nature of the established model was verified.The evaluation results could avoid the interference of human subjective factors and were more in line with the actual situation.

参考文献/References:

［1］郭其云，周培桂，周梅捧.我国城市风险治理法律责任承担机制研究——由深圳光明新区“12·20”特别重大滑坡事故引发的思考［J］.灾害学，2018，33（3）:152-155. GUO Qiyun,ZHOU Peigui,ZHOU Meipeng.A study on the legal liability mechanism of urban risk management in China—a reflection triggered by the “12·20” landslide accident in Guangming new area of Shenzhen［J］.Catastrophology,2018,33（3）:152-155.
［2］王大为，王立，王小平，等.临洮县生产建设项目弃渣场土壤流失特征——以肖家河水电站二期工程为例［J］.水土保持通报，2016，36（4）:51-55 WANG Dawei,WANG Li,WANG Xiaoping,et al.Characteristics of soil loss in waste disposal site of Lintao county production and construction project—a case study of the second phase of Xiaojiahe hydropower station［J］.Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,36（4）:51-55
［3］穆军，李占斌，李鹏,等.干热河谷水电站弃渣场植被恢复技术研究［J］.应用基础与工程科学学报，2010，18（2）:245-252. MU Jun,LI Zhanbin,LI Peng,et al.Study on vegetation restoration technology of slag dump site in dry and hot valley hydropower station［J］.Journal of Basic Science and Engineering,2010,18（2）:245-252.
［4］周昌群.山区高速公路弃渣场稳定性及关键技术控制研究［D］.重庆:重庆交通大学，2018.
［5］袁普金，姚赫，张勇,等.生产建设项目弃渣场安全选址方案研究［J］.水土保持通报，2018，38（6）:132-137. YUAN Pujin,YAO He,ZHANG Yong,et al.Research on safe site selection scheme of waste dump site in production and construction projects［J］.Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2018,38（6）:132-137.
［6］吴侃侃.海岸带区域战略决策的环境风险评价研究［D］.厦门：厦门大学,2012.
［7］郭捷.工程项目风险分析与BT模式风险管理实证研究［D］.天津:天津大学，2004.
［8］FRIEDMAN J H,TUKEY J W.A projection pursuit algorithm for exploratory data analysis［J］.IEEE Transactions on Computers,2006,C-23（9）:881-890.
［9］KRUSKAL J B.Toward a practical method which helps uncover the structure of a set of multivariate observations by finding the linear transformation which optimizes a new “index of condensation”［J］.Statistical Computation,1969:427-440.
［10］高颖，方国华，林泽昕.投影寻踪和BP网络在农村饮用水水质评价中的应用［J］.水资源与水工程学报，2017，28（2）:115-119. GAO Ying,FANG Guohua,LIN Zexin.Application of projection pursuit and BP neural network in assessment of drinking water quality in rural areas［J］.Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering,2017，28（2）:115-119.
［11］SMOLIN＇SKI,ADAM,DROBEKL,et al.Modeling of experimental data on trace elements and organic compounds content in industrial waste dumps［J］.Chemosphere,2016,162:189-198.
［12］王益伟,罗周全,杨彪,等.基于投影寻踪模型的矿山地下水灾害分级评价［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(3):41-47. WANG Yiwei,LUO Zhouquan,YANG Biao,et al.Ranking evaluation of groundwater disaster in mine based on projection pursuit model［J］.Journal of Safety Scienceand Technology,2014,10(3):41-47.
［13］贺晶.基于投影寻踪模型的创业环境条件评价研究［D］.长沙:湖南大学，2017.
［14］裴巍，付强，刘东，等.基于改进投影寻踪模型黑龙江省土地资源生态安全评价［J］.东北农业大学学报，2016，47（7）:92-100. PEI Wei,FU Qiang,LIU Dong,et al.Evaluation of ecological security of land resources in heilongjiang province based on improved projection tracking model ［J］.Journal of Northeast Agricultural University,2016,47（7）:92-100.
［15］黄水清，张俊，阎素兰.黄金分割法在学科及机构评价中的应用［J］.图书情报工作，2012，56（22）:33-36. HUANG Shuiqing,ZHANG Jun,YAN Sulan.Application of golden section method in subject and institution evaluation ［J］.Library and Information Service,2012,56（22）:33-36.

相似文献/References:

[1]许红军,田俊改.支线机场安全动态预警技术研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):123.
　XU Hong-jun,TIAN Jun-gai.Dynamic hazard identification and evaluation techniques for regional airport safety and security[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(8):123.
[2]张晓,张钢.船上劳动安全风险辨识研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):161.
　ZHANG Xiao,ZHANG Gang.A study on risk identification of shipboard working safety[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(8):161.
[3]王长建,陈刚.风险因子模糊评价法在钻机安全评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(9):149.
　WANG Chang-jian,CHEN Gang.The Applications of Risk Factor Fuzzy Evaluation Method（RFEM）to Risk Assessment of Drilling Rig[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(8):149.
[4]石荣,李明捷.变权综合法在航空公司风险评价中的应用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(10):143.
　SHI Rong,LI Ming-jie.Application of variable weight synthetic evaluation method in safety assessment of SMS of civil aviation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(8):143.
[5]巫志鹏,白永忠,林景喜.新化工装置风险评价方法的研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(10):154.
　WU Zhi-peng,BAI Yong-zhong,LIN Jing-xi.Study on the methods of hazard risk assessment for new facilities[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(8):154.
[6]徐吉辉,姜帆,张亮.基于SEFA的现役装备改进风险评价指标体系研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(3):53.
　XU Ji hui,JIANG Fan,ZHANG Liang.Research on evaluation index system of active equipment improvement risk[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(8):53.
[7]张蒙,冯福亮.成品油库临时性常规作业管理现状分析及改进措施[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(11):216.
　ZHANG Meng,FENG Fu liang.Present situation analysis and improvement measurement for management of the occasional conventional operation in oil tankfarm[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(8):216.
[8]高旭,张圣柱,杨国梁,等.风险沟通研究进展综述[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):148.
　GAO Xu,ZHANG Sheng-zhu,YANG Guo-liang,et al.Overview on reseach status of risk communication[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(8):148.
[9]汪长永,杨卫,殷焕召,等.模糊综合评价法在油气管道跨越工程风险评价中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(3):143.
　WANG Chang-yong,YANG Wei,YIN Huan-zhao,et al.Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in risk evaluation of pipeline crossing engineering[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(8):143.
[10]王文和,易俊,沈士明.基于风险的城市埋地燃气管道安全评价模型及应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(3):163.
　WANG Wen-he,YI Jun,SHEN Shi-ming.Safety evaluation model and application for the urban buried gas pipeline based on risk[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(8):163.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2019-07-09
* 基金项目： 国家自然科学基金项目（51574201）
作者简介： 吴伟东，硕士，副教授，主要研究方向为工程项目评价与管理。
通信作者： 苟唐巧，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为风险管理。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-04