|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]廖慧敏,罗小娟,苏红.教学楼火灾疏散的标识认知应对规律研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(8):131-136.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.08.021]
 LIAO Huimin,LUO Xiaojuan,SU Hong.Research on cognitive coping regularity of evacuation signs in fire of teaching building[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(8):131-136.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.08.021]
点击复制

教学楼火灾疏散的标识认知应对规律研究
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
15
期数:
2019年8期
页码:
131-136
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2019-08-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on cognitive coping regularity of evacuation signs in fire of teaching building
文章编号:
1673-193X(2019)-08-0131-06
作者:
廖慧敏罗小娟 苏红
(中南大学 资源与安全工程学院,湖南 长沙,410083)
Author(s):
LIAO HuiminLUO XiaojuanSU Hong
(School of Resources and Safety Engineering,Central South University,Changsha Hunan 410083,China)
关键词:
火灾安全疏散疏散标识疏散决策认知重评认知应对模型
Keywords:
fire safety evacuation evacuation sign evacuation decision cognitive reappraisal cognitive coping model
分类号:
X928.7
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.08.021
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了研究逃生者在疏散标识引导下的火灾疏散效率与逃生认知应对规律,基于实地调研与问卷调查结果,采用Anylogic软件,对常规标识与增设标识2种教学楼火灾疏散情境进行仿真模拟。研究结果表明:在疏散过程中,增设标识能使各疏散出口的疏散时间相对持平,避免了常规疏散中通道过早闲置的现象;人流在一层教学楼的平均疏散时长缩短了约10%,显著缩短了整栋教学楼的疏散时间。据此火灾标识疏散仿真过程与人的认知反应提出了火灾疏散与标识认知应对规律模型。
Abstract:
In order to study the fire evacuation efficiency and cognitive coping regularity of escaper under the guidance of evacuation signs,two kinds of evacuation situations in the fire of teaching building including the conventional signs and adding signs were simulated by using the Anylogic software based on the results of field investigation and questionnaire survey.The results showed that during the evacuation process,adding signs could make the evacuation time of each evacuation exit relatively flat,avoiding the phenomenon that the passage was prematurely idle during the conventional evacuation.The average evacuation time of crowd in the first floor of teaching building reduced by about 10%,which significantly shortened the evacuation time of the whole teaching building.According to the simulation process of fire sign evacuation and people’s cognitive response,a model of fire evacuation and cognitive coping regularity of signs was proposed.

参考文献/References:

[1]CHALMET L G,FRANCIS R L,SAUNDERS P B.Network models for building evacuation[J].Management Science,1982,28(1):86-105.
[2]陈淼,韩端锋.船舶人员疏散仿真模型[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2011,32(7):862-866.CHEN Miao,HAN Duanfeng.Simulation model of ship personnel evacuation[J].Journal of Harbin University,2011,32(7):862-866.
[3]朱成华,韩端锋,陈淼,等.基于DEA原理的船舶人员疏散通达性评估[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报,2015,36(6):741-745.ZHU Chenghua,HAN Duanfeng,CHEN Miao,et al.Evaluation of evacuation accessibility of ship personnel based on DEA principle[J].Journal of Harbin University,2015,36(6):741-745.
[4]MASHRURA M,JENNIFER S,FAISAL K,et al.Assessing offshore emergency evacuation behavior in a virtual environment using a Bayesian Network approach[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2016,152:28-37.
[5]郭细伟,陈建桥,魏俊红.格子气模型在地铁站人群疏散运动中的应用[J].武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版),2014,38(3):567-571.GUO Xiwei,CHEN Jianqiao,WEI Junhong.Application of lattice gas model in evacuation movement of subway station population[J].Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Transportation Science and Engineering),2014,38(3):567-571.
[6]王起全,王帷先.地铁火灾应急疏散路线规划与对策[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(3):131-136.WANG Qiquan,WANG Weixian.Planning and countermeasures of emergency evacuation route in subway fire[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2017,13(3):131-136.
[7]LI Zhenyu,TANF Minbo,DONG Liang,et al.Numerical simulation of evacuation in a subway station[J].Procedia Engineering,2016,135:616-621.
[8]AHN C,KIM J,LEE S.An analysis of evacuation under fire situation in complex shopping center using evacuation simulation modeling[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2016,218:24-34.
[9]HUO Feizhou,SONG Weiguo,CHEN Lei,et al.Experimental study on characteristics of pedestrian evacuation on stairs in a high-rise building[J].Safety Science,2016,86:165-173.
[10]刘久文.火灾中人的行为及疏散对策[J].消防科技,1995(4):7-11.LIU Jiuwen.Human behavior and evacuation measures in fire[J].Fire Science and Technology,1995(4):7-11.
[11]宋译.建筑物火灾疏散中人员的行为可靠性研究[D].长沙:湖南科技大学,2008.
[12]廖慧敏,吴超,赵弟丰.火灾情境下认知生理反应与建筑物疏散标识优化研究[J].安全与环境学报,2018,18(1):205-210.LIAO Huimin,WU Cao,ZHAO Difeng.Study on cognitive physiological response and optimization of building evacuation marking in fire situation[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2018,18(1):205-210.
[13]阎卫东.火灾情况下人员认知水平对疏散时间影响研究[C]// Proceedings of 2010(Shenyang) International Colloquium on Safety Science and Technology.东北大学:东北大学安全工程研究中心,2010.
[14]潘彦谷,刘衍玲,马建苓,等.共情的神经生物基础[J].心理科学进展,2012,20(12):2011-2021.PAN Yangu,LIU Yaling,MA Jianling,et al.The neurobiological basis of empathy[J].Advances in Psychological Science,2012,20(12):2011-2021.
[15]毛华配,廖传景,黄成毅,等.动态决策模型下情绪对风险决策的影响[J].心理与行为研究,2014,12(2):244-247.MAO Huapei,LIAO Chuanjing,HUANG Chengyi,et al.The influence of emotion on risk decision in dynamic decision model[J].Studies of Psychology and Behavior,2014,12(2):244-247.
[16]BACZKOWSKI B M,JOHNSTONE T,WALTER H,et al.Sliding-window analysis tracks fluctuations in amygdala functional connectivity associated with physiological arousal and vigilance during fear conditioning[J].Neuroimage,2017,153:168-178.
[17]MORAWETZ C,BODE S,DERNTL B,et al.The effect ofstrategies,goals and stimulus material on the neural mechanisms of emotion regulation:A meta-analysis of fMRI studies[J].Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,2017,72:111-128.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2019-05-21;数字出版日期: 2019-08-28
* 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(51704328);国家重点研发计划课题(2018YFC0808404)
作者简介: 廖慧敏,博士,副研究员,主要研究方向为安全认知心理与行为决策。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-04