|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]余华茂.基于Windows DEA模型的我国自然灾害应急公共投入绩效研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(7):39-45.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.07.006]
 YU Huamao.Research on performance of public input for natural disaster emergency in China based on Windows DEA Model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(7):39-45.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.07.006]
点击复制

基于Windows DEA模型的我国自然灾害应急公共投入绩效研究
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
15
期数:
2019年7期
页码:
39-45
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2019-07-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on performance of public input for natural disaster emergency in China based on Windows DEA Model
文章编号:
1673-193X(2019)-07-0039-07
作者:
余华茂
(江西财经大学 经济学院,江西 南昌 330077)
Author(s):
YU Huamao
(School of Economics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang Jiangxi 330077, China)
关键词:
应急公共投入自然灾害绩效Windows DEA模型
Keywords:
emergency public inputnatural diasterperformanceWindows DEA model
分类号:
X915.4
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.07.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为提升自然灾害应急公共投入绩效评价的精准性、科学性,运用动态绩效评价Windows DEA模型,结合应急处置结果,对我国近年来自然灾害领域的应急公共投入绩效进行全面系统评价,研究结果表明:我国应急公共投入效率不高且有较大改善空间;应急公共投入效率较高的省(区、市)未能产生辐射效应;我国应急公共投入效率呈现“滞后性”,即当年投入的应急公共投入在当年未得到相应产出。
Abstract:
In order to improve the accuracy and scientificity of the performance evaluation on the public input for natural disasters emergency, the Windows DEA model of dynamic performance evaluation was applied to carry out the comprehensive and systematic evaluation on the performance of public emergency input for natural disasters in China in recent years combined with the results of emergency response. The results showed that the efficiency of public emergency input in China is not high enough and there is ample room for improve; The provinces (districts and municipalities) with high efficiency of emergency public input could not produce the radiation effect. The efficiency of emergency public input in China presented a “lagging”, that was, the public emergency input in the current year could not obtain the corresponding output in this year.

参考文献/References:

[1]KINCAID J P , DONOVAN J , PETTITT B. Simulation techniques for training emergency response[J]. International Journal of Emergency Management, 2003, 1(3):238.
[2]ROBERT L.Public Budgeting Systems,8th Edition [M].Jones & Bartlett Pub,2007.
[3]梁宏亮,黄欣涔.基于AHP模型的灾害救援重建财政支出绩效评价研究[J].当代教育理论与实践,2012,4(8):171-174. LIANG Hongliang, HUANG Xincen. Research on performance evaluation of financial expenditure for disaster relief and reconstruction based on AHP model [J]. Contemporary Education Theory and Practice, 2012, 4 (8): 171-174.
[4]王杰,饶海琴.我国应急管理财政支出的绩效评价体系浅析[J].金融经济,2013(2):85-87. WANG Jie,RAO Haiqin.Analysis on the performance evaluation system of financial expenditure for emergency management in China [J]. Financial Economy, 2013 (2): 85-87.
[5]崔军,杨琪.应急财政支出绩效评估指标体系构建研究——基于模糊层次分析法的考察[J].财贸经济,2013(3):21-31. CUI Jun,YANG Qi.Research on the construction of performance evaluation index system of emergency financial expenditure based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process [J]. Finance and Trade Economy, 2013 (3): 21-31.
[6]GUO P B,QI X Y,ZHOU X J.Total-factor energy efficiency of coal consumption: An empirical analysis of China’s energy intensive industries [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018(172):2618-2624.
[7]李经路,闫维艳.DEA视窗分析的高校科研效率:2009—2015年间的A区数据 [J].科技管理研究, 2017, 37(23): 142-151. LI Jinglu,YAN Weiyan.DEA Window analysis of scientific research efficiency in colleges and universities: Data of area A from 2009 to 2015 [J]. Research on Science and Technology Management,2017, 37 (23): 142-151.
[8]WANG K,YU S,ZHANG W.China’s regional energy and environmental efficiency: A DEA window analysis based dynamic evaluation [J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2013(58):1117-1127.
[9]YANG H H ,CHANG C Y.Using DEA window analysis to measure efficiencies of Taiwan’s integrated telecommunication firms [J].Telecommunications Policy, 2009(33): 98-108.
[10]ASMILD M , PARADI J C , SCHAFFNIT V A. Combining DEA Window analysis with the malmquist index approach in a study of the Canadian banking industry[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2004, 21(1):67-89.
[11]HWANG Y G , PARK S , KIM D. Efficiency analysis of official development assistance provided by Korea[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(8) : 2697.
[12]KYUNGWAN K , MEEHYANG C , EUN-SONG B, et al. Efficiency analysis of retail chain stores in Korea[J]. Sustainability, 2017, 9(9):1629.
[13]王美强, 李勇军. 具有双重角色和非期望要素的供应商评价两阶段DEA模型 [J]. 中国管理科学, 2016(12):91-97. WANG Meiqiang,LI Yongjun.Two-stage DEA model for supplier evaluation with dual roles and unexpected factors [J]. China Management Science, 2016 (12): 91-97.
[14]刘德彬,马超群,周忠宝,等.存在非期望输入输出的多阶段系统效率评价模型[J].中国管理科学, 2015, 23(4): 129-138. LIU Debin,MA Chaoqun,ZHOU Zhongbao,et al.There exists a multi-stage system efficiency evaluation model of unexpected input and output [J]. China Management Science, 2015, 23 (4): 129-138.
[15]SAEN R F . Developing a new data envelopment analysis methodology for supplier selection in the presence of both undesirable outputs and imprecise data[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2010, 51(9-12):1243-1250.

相似文献/References:

[1]温宁,刘铁民.基于对抗交叉评价模型的中国自然灾害区域脆弱性评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(4):24.
 WEN Ning,LIU Tie-min.The assessment of regional vulnerability to natural disasters in China by using the aggressive-cross-evaluation model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(7):24.
[2]高娇娇,王 威,苏经宇,等.区域自然灾害综合风险模糊随机评价方法[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(5):95.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.05.017]
 GAO Jiaojiao,WANG Wei,SU Jingyu,et al.Fuzzy stochastic simulation method for comprehensive risk assessment of regional natural disaster[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(7):95.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.05.017]
[3]温佩,郭丽芳,马家齐.城市自然灾害应急管理中社会参与的评价研究 ——以太原市为例*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(1):80.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.01.015]
 WEN Pei,GUO Lifang,MA Jiaqi.Research on evaluation of social participation in urban emergency management of natural disaster-taking Taiyuan as example[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(7):80.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.01.015]
[4]杨涛,郭琦,肖天贵.“一带一路”沿线自然灾害分布特征研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(10):165.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.10.028]
 YANG Tao,GUO Qi,XIAO Tiangui.Research on distribution characteristics of natural disasters along "the Belt and Road"[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(7):165.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.10.028]
[5]汪嘉俊,翁文国.多灾种概念辨析及灾害事故关系研究综述[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(11):57.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.11.009]
 WANG Jiajun,WENG Wenguo.Discrimination on concept of multihazard and review of research on relationship between disasters and accidents[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(7):57.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.11.009]
[6]刘纪达,宋雨薇,安实,等.自然灾害应急会商协调网络特征与优化研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(7):34.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.07.005]
 LIU Jida,SONG Yuwei,AN Shi,et al.Study on characteristics and optimization of emergency consultation coordination network for natural disaster mitigation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(7):34.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.07.005]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2019-03-19
* 基金项目: 江西省博士生创新专项资金项目(YC2014-B045)
作者简介: 余华茂,博士研究生,讲师,主要研究方向为应急经济与应急管理。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-08-07