|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]孙开畅,陈璇,时训先,等.基于区间直觉模糊信息TODM法的水利工程应急决策研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(3):19-24.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.03.003]
 SUN Kaichang,CHEN Xuan,SHI Xunxian,et al.Study on emergency decisionmaking of hydraulic engineering based on interval intuitionistic fuzzy information TODIM method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(3):19-24.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.03.003]
点击复制

基于区间直觉模糊信息TODM法的水利工程应急决策研究
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
15
期数:
2019年3期
页码:
19-24
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2019-03-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on emergency decisionmaking of hydraulic engineering based on interval intuitionistic fuzzy information TODIM method
文章编号:
1673-193X(2019)-03-0019-06
作者:
孙开畅1陈璇1时训先2马文俊1朱自立1
(1.三峡大学 水利与环境学院,湖北 宜昌 443002; 2.中国安全生产科学研究院 工业安全研究所,北京 100012)
Author(s):
SUN Kaichang1CHEN Xuan1SHI Xunxian2MA Wenjun1ZHU Zili1
(1. School of Hydraulic & Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang Hubei 443002, China;2. Institute of Industrial Safety, China Academy of Safety Science & Technology, Beijing 100012, China)
关键词:
应急决策风险偏好区间直觉模糊集TODIM法损失规避系数水利工程
Keywords:
emergency decisionmaking risk preference interval intuitionistic fuzzy set TODIM method loss avoidance coefficient hydraulic engineering
分类号:
X93;TV513
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.03.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为更合理地进行应急方案比选,减少不确定因素和决策者偏好对决策结果的影响,构造了1种更加适应水利工程应急决策的模型。针对应急决策环境的模糊性和不确定性,引入区间直觉模糊集表达评价信息,采用区间直觉模糊熵计算各指标权重;通过构造备选方案两两比较矩阵,运用区间直觉模糊距离测度公式计算方案间的损益值;结合TODIM法计算各方案相对占优度并进行比较排序,确定最优方案。研究结果表明:在损失规避系数确定的前提下,选择任一区间直觉模糊距离公式都不影响方案的优劣排序,决策模型具有一定的可靠性和稳定性。
Abstract:
In order to compare and select the emergency schemes more reasonably, and reduce the influence of uncertain factors and preference of decisionmaker on the decisionmaking results, an emergency decisionmaking model being more suitable for the emergency decisionmaking of hydraulic engineering was constructed. Aiming at the fuzziness and uncertainty of emergency decisionmaking environment, the interval intuitionistic fuzzy set was introduced to express the evaluation information, and the weight of each index was calculated by using the interval intuitionistic fuzzy entropy. Through constructing the pairwise comparison matrix of alternative schemes, the profit and loss values between the schemes were calculated by using the measure formulas of interval intuitionistic fuzzy distance. The relative dominance degree of each scheme was calculated by using the TODIM method, then the comparison and ranking were carried out, and the optimal scheme was determined. The results showed that under the premise of determined loss avoidance coefficient, the selection of any interval intuitionistic fuzzy distance formula had no effect on the ranking of schemes, and the decisionmaking model has certain reliability and stability.

参考文献/References:

[1]孙开畅,周剑岚. 水利水电工程施工安全风险管理[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社,2013.
[2]郑丽娟. 水利水电工程施工安全评价与管理系统研究[D]. 保定:河北农业大学, 2015.
[3]陈孝国,母丽华,杜红,等.煤矿突发事件应急救援的群决策方法[J].灾害学, 2015,30(1):167-180. CHEN Xiaoguo,MU Lihua ,DU Hong, et al. A group decision making method of coal mine emergency rescue [J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2015, 30(1):167-180.
[4]马文笑,王德鲁.基于案例推理的突发环境事件应急决策模型[J].中国安全生产科学技术, 2017,13(12):85-90. MA Wenxiao,WANG Delu. Emergency decision -making model of emergency environmental accidents based on case-based reasoning [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2017, 13(12):85-90.
[5]郑霞忠,邵波,陈玲等.水电厂突发事件应急救援方案云决策模型研究[J].中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(4):157-163. ZHENG Xiazhong,SHAO Bo,CHEN Ling, et al. Hydropower emergency rescue decision model based on cloud [J]China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(4):157-163.
[6]樊治平,刘洋,沈荣鉴.基于前景理论的突发事件应急响应的风险决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2012, 32(5):977-984. FAN Zhiping, LIU Yang, SHEN Rongjian. Risk decision analysis method for emergency response based on prospect theory [J]. Systems Engineering Theory and Practice, 2012, 32(5):977-984.
[7]江新,徐平,郑霞忠.水电工程施工突发事件应急响应方案决策研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术, 2016, 26(4):161-167. JIANG Xin,XU Ping, ZHENG Xiazhong. hydropower project construction [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016,26(4):161-167.
[8]TVERSKY A, KAHNEMAN D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty [J].Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5(4):297-323.
[9]ATANASSOV K T. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1986, 20(1):87-96.
[10]徐泽水.直觉模糊信息集成理论及应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
[11]DESCHRIJVER G, KERRE E E. On the relationship between some extension of fuzzy set theory [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2003, 133:227-235.
[12]ATANASSOV K T, GARGOV G. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets [J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1989,31(3): 343-349.
[13]GOMES L F A M, LIMA M M P. TODIM: Basics and application to multicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts [J].Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences,1992, 16(3-4): 113-127.
[14]王培,魏翠萍.一种区间直觉模糊熵的构造方法[J]. 计算机工程与应用,2011,47(2):43-45. WANG Pei,WEI Cuiping.Constructing method of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy entropy [J].Computer Engineering and Applications,2011,27(2):43-45.
[15]孙开畅,李权,尹志伟. 水利工程施工应急能力G1-灰色评价方法研究[J]. 水利水电技术,2017,6(48): 43-47. SUN Kaichang,LI Quan,YIN Zhiwei. Study on G1-grey evaluation method for emergency capability in hydraulic engineering construction [J]. Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, 2017, 6(48): 43-47.

相似文献/References:

[1]胡艳菊,李彦海,胡忆沩.危险化学品突发泄漏事故应急决策系统的开发与应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(4):109.
 HU Yan-ju,LI Yan-hai,HU Yi-wei.Development and application of the emergency decision system for dangerous chemicals burst leaking accident[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(3):109.
[2]徐亚博,汪彤,王培怡,等.基于案例推理的地铁非常规突发事件应急决策方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(8):44.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.08.008]
 XU Ya bo,WANG Tong,WANG Pei yi,et al.Research on emergency decision method of unconventional emergency in subway based on casebased reasoning[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(3):44.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.08.008]
[3]方来华,闫露璐,吴宗之,等.液碳生产企业安全监控与自控系统开发[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(9):116.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.09.022]
 FANG Lai hua,YAN Lu lu,WU Zong zhi,et al.Development of safety monitoring and automatic control system for liquid carbon production plant[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(3):116.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.09.022]
[4]谭睿璞,张文德,陈龙龙.基于单值中智集VIKOR的应急群体决策方法[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(2):79.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.02.014]
 TAN Ruipu,ZHANG Wende,CHEN Longlong.Study on emergency group decision making method based on VIKOR with single valued neutrosophic sets[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(3):79.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.02.014]
[5]温念慈,倪少权,陈钉均,等.城市轨道交通突发大客流协同应急决策研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(7):48.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.07.008]
 WEN Nianci,NI Shaoquan,CHEN Dingjun,et al.Study on collaborative emergency decision of outburst mass passenger flow in urban rail transit[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(3):48.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.07.008]
[6]马文笑,王德鲁.基于案例推理的突发环境事件应急决策模型[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(12):85.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.12.013]
 MA Wenxiao,WANG Delu.Emergency decision-making model of emergency environmental accidents based on case-based reasoning[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(3):85.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.12.013]
[7]高平,夏登友,周扬.基于模糊逻辑理论的应急决策冲突程度表示方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(12):158.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.12.026]
 GAO Ping,XIA Dengyou,ZHOU Yang.Research on representation method for conflict degree of emergency decisionmaking based on fuzzy logic theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(3):158.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.12.026]
[8]王永明.突发事件应急决策模拟演练设计理论框架与技术要点[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(5):5.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.05.001]
 WANG Yongming.Theoretical framework and technical essentials of simulation drill design on emergency decisionmaking of emergencies[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(3):5.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.05.001]
[9]徐可,盖文妹,邓云峰.基于LCS的应急决策文本相似性比对分析模型[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(5):11.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.05.002]
 XU Ke,GAI Wenmei,DENG Yunfeng.Comparative analysis model on similarity of emergency decisionmaking texts based on LCS[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(3):11.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.05.002]
[10]张炎亮,徐元元,李俊雅.不完备信息下基于案例推理的城市火灾应急决策方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(3):13.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.03.002]
 ZHANG Yanliang,XU Yuanyuan,LI Junya.Study on emergency decision-making method of urban fire based on case-based reasoning under incomplete information[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(3):13.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.03.002]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期: 2019-01-24
基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0805100);三峡大学硕士学位论文培优基金项目(2019SSPY003)
作者简介: 孙开畅,硕士,教授,主要研究方向为水利工程施工技术及施工作业安全风险。
通信作者: 陈璇,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为水利工程施工作业安全风险。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-04-15