|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈长坤,秦文龙,童蕴贺,等.突发火灾下人员疏散心理及行为的调查与分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(8):35-40.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.08.006]
 CHEN Changkun,QIN Wenlong,TONG Yunhe,et al.Investigation and analysis on evacuation psychology and behavior of personnel under sudden fire[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(8):35-40.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.08.006]
点击复制

突发火灾下人员疏散心理及行为的调查与分析
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
14
期数:
2018年8期
页码:
35-40
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2018-08-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Investigation and analysis on evacuation psychology and behavior of personnel under sudden fire
文章编号:
1673-193X(2018)-08-0035-06
作者:
陈长坤1秦文龙1童蕴贺1陈以琴2
(1. 中南大学 防灾科学与安全技术研究所, 湖南 长沙 410075;2. 中南大学 资源与安全工程学院,湖南 长沙 410083)
Author(s):
CHEN Changkun1 QIN Wenlong1 TONG Yunhe1 CHEN Yiqin2
(1. Institute of Disaster Prevention Science and Safety Technology, Central South University, Changsha Hunan 410075, China;2. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha Hunan 410083, China)
关键词:
突发火灾疏散心理和行为问卷调查相关性分析
Keywords:
sudden fire evacuation psychology and behavior questionnaire survey correlation analysis
分类号:
X928.7
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.08.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了解突发火灾下人员的疏散心理及行为,开展火灾状况下人员应激反应与疏散安全意识的问卷调查。问卷从人员基本特征、疏散安全意识、疏散心理及行为(恐慌、竞争、折返、从众、冒险等)等方面进行设计,对数据进行采集与处理,采用皮尔逊卡方检验分析了性别、年龄、疏散教育培训程度等与疏散心理和行为的相关性。研究结果表明:突发火灾下,疏散过程中多数人将表现出明显的竞争(约69%)、避让(约62%)、合理的冒险认知(约85%)、恐慌(约90%)和“自私”行为(约71%)。在性别方面,女性比男性更愿意相信疏散指示标识,也更容易表现出从众行为;在疏散教育培训影响方面,疏散培训频率越高,人员疏散意识越好;在是否会发生折返方面,84%的人表示火场中存在家人时会折返,而75%的人则表示存在贵重物品时将不会折返。
Abstract:
To understand the evacuation psychology and behavior of personnel under the sudden fire, a questionnaire survey on the stress response and evacuation safety consciousness of personnel under the fire was conducted. The questionnaire was designed from the aspects including the personnel basic characteristics, evacuation safety consciousness, evacuation psychology and behavior (panic, competition, reentrant, conformity, adventure, etc.), and so on. The data were collected and processed, and the correlation between the gender, age, evacuation education training degree and the evacuation psychology and behavior were analyzed by using the Pearson Chisquare test. The results showed that during the evacuation process under the sudden fire, most people presented the obvious competition (about 69%), avoidance (about 62%), reasonable adventure cognition (about 85%), panic (about 90%) and “selfishness” behavior (about 71%). In term of gender, women were more likely to believe in the evacuation indicators and more likely to show the conformity behavior than men. In term of influence by the evacuation education training, the higher the frequency of evacuation training, the better the personnel evacuation consciousness. In term of whether to reentrant, 84 percent of personnel expressed that they would reentrant when their family member existed in the fire scene, while 75 percent of personnel expressed that they would not reentrant when the valuables existed.

参考文献/References:

[1]傅智敏. 我国火灾统计数据分析[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2014, 14(6): 341-345. FU Zhimin. Analysis on the fire data in China for the period between 2003-2012 [J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2014, 14(6): 341-345.
[2]BRYAN J L. Human behaviour in fire: the development and maturity of a scholarly study area [J]. Fire Mater, 1999(23): 249-253.
[3]ZHENG X, CHENG Y. Conflict game in evacuation process: a study combining cellular automata model [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2011, 390(6):1042-1050.
[4]ZHENG X, CHENG Y. Modeling cooperative and competitive behaviors in emergency evacuation: a game-theoretical approach [J]. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 2011, 62(12): 4627-4634.
[5]YANG X, JEFF B X, MITCHELL J. Modeling multimodal transportation network emergency evacuation considering evacuees’ cooperative behavior [J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2017(23):1038-1058.
[6]LOVREGLIO R, FONZONE A, DELL O L, et al. The role of herding behaviour in exit choice during evacuation [J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014(160): 390-399.
[7]张培红,尚融雪,姜泽民,等. 大型商场人员疏散行为的调查和分析[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2011(3):439-442. ZHANG Peihong, SHANG Rongxue, JIANG Zemin, et al. Investigation and analysis of evacuation behavior in a large shopping mall [J]. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 2011(3): 439-442.
[8]HELBING D, ILLESFARKAS, TAMASVIESEK. Simulating dynamical features of escape panic [J]. Nature, 2000(407): 487-490.
[9]SONG X, MA L, MA Y, et al. Selfishness-and selflessness-based models of pedestrian room evacuation [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2016(447): 455-466.
[10]VON K C, SCHADSEHNEIDER A. Empirical study on social groups in pedestrian evacuation dynamics [J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2017(475): 129-141.
[11]郭雩,何理,石杰红,等. 地铁不同人群疏散行为特征调查问卷研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2012, 8(4): 183-188. GUO Yu, HE Li, SHI Jiehong, et al. Questionnaire research on the evacuation behavior characteristics of different crowds in subway [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012, 8(4): 183-188.
[12]PROULX G. Evacuation time and movement in apartment buildings [J]. Fire Safety Journal, 1995, 24(3): 229-246.
[13]SHIWAKOTI N, TAY R, STASINOPOULOS P, et al. Passengers' awareness and perceptions of way finding tools in a train station [J]. Safety Science, 2016(87): 179-185.
[14]穆娜娜,肖国清,何理,等. 地铁人员疏散心理行为调查及相关性研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2013,9(6): 85-90. MU Nana, XIAO Guoqing, HE Li, et al. Investigation and correlation study on human evacuation psychological behavior in subway[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2013,9(6): 85-90.
[15]李晓萌. 人员疏散行为的实验研究[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2008.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0804900);国家自然科学基金项目(71790613,51534008)
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-03