|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]傅贵,索晓,贾清淞,等.10种事故致因模型的对比研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(2):58-63.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.02.009]
　FU Gui,SUO Xiao,JIA Qingsong,et al.Comparative study on ten accident causation models[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(2):58-63.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.02.009]
点击复制

10种事故致因模型的对比研究
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
14
期数:
2018年2期
页码:
58-63
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2018-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative study on ten accident causation models
文章编号:
1673-193X(2018)-02-0058-06
作者:
傅贵1; 2 ; 索晓1; 2; 贾清淞1; 2; 付明明3
（1.中国矿业大学（北京） 资源与安全工程学院，北京 100083； 2.中国矿业大学（北京） 煤炭资源与安全开采国家重点实验室，北京 100083； 3.滨州学院 化工与安全学院，山东 滨州 256600）
Author(s):
FU Gui1; 2;  SUO Xiao1; 2;  JIA Qingsong1; 2;  FU Mingming3
(1. School of Resources & Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology(Beijing), Beijing 100083, China;3.Institute of Chemical Engineering and Safety,Binzhou University, Binzhou Shandong 256600）
关键词:
事故致因模型; 事故分析; 线性事故致模型; 系统事故致因模型; 社会技术系统
Keywords:
accident causation model;  accident analysis;  linear accident causation model;  systemic accident causation model;  sociotechnical system
分类号:
X92
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.02.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了给事故致因模型的研究提供理论支持，为日常管理中事故致因模型的选用提供参考依据，从事故的影响对象、模型的组成和事故发生的路径3个维度对10种事故致因模型进行了对比分析。研究结果表明：事故致因模型对事故影响对象的涵盖越来越全面；事故致因模型的组成日趋全面，且趋于对模型中各模块给出清晰定义以能保证分析结果的准确性；故发生的路径描述由链式向系统网状发展；根据充分性和效率的需求对模块化模型和非模块化的模型进行选择。
Abstract:
To provide the theoretical support for the study on accident causation models and provide the reference basis for the selection of accident causation models in daily management, the comparative analysis on ten accident causation models were carried out from three dimensions of the affected objects of accident, the composition of the model and the path of the accident occurrence. The results showed that the accident causation models are getting more and more comprehensive for the cover on the affected objects of accident. The composition of the accident causation models is getting more comprehensive, and there is a trend to make a clear definition of each module in the model to ensure the accuracy of the analysis results. The description of the path of the accident occurrence develops from the chain type to the system network type. The choice of the modular and non-modular accident causation models can be carried out according to the requirements of adequacy and efficiency.

参考文献/References:

［1］GARG D P. Sociotechnical systems: Factors in analysis, design, and management［J］. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1975, 63(8):1263-1263.
［2］HEINRICH H W, PETERSEN D C, ROOS N R. Industrial accident prevention: A safety management approach ［M］. McGraw-Hill Companies, 1980.
［3］LEVENSON N G. System safety and computers ［M］. Boston: Addison Wesley, 1995.
［4］REASON J. Human Error ［M］. New York: Cambridge university press, 1990.
［5］SHAPPELL S A, WIEGMANN D A. A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: The human factors analysis and classification system ［M］. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2012.
［6］DE Landre J, GIBB G, WALTERS N. Using incident investigation tools proactively for incident prevention［C］//Proceedings of the Australian & New Zealand Societies of Air Safety Investigators Conference, 2006.
［7］CELIK M, CEBI S. Analytical HFACS for investigating human errors in shipping accidents［J］. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2009, 41(1): 66-75.
［8］CHEN S T, WALL A, DAVIES P, et al. A Human and Organisational Factors (HOFs) analysis method for marine casualties using HFACS-Maritime Accidents (HFACS-MA)［J］. Safety Science, 2013, 60(12):105-114.
［9］LI W C, HARRIS D. Pilot error and its relationship with higher organizational levels: HFACS analysis of 523 accidents［J］. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 2006, 77(10): 1056-1061.
［10］PATTERSON J M, SHAPPELL S A. Operator error and system deficiencies: analysis of 508 mining incidents and accidents from Queensland, Australia using HFACS［J］. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2010, 42(4): 1379-1385.
［11］HOLLNAGELE. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM) ［M］. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1998.
［12］HOLLNAGEL E, WOODS D D. Joint cognitive systems: Foundations of cognitive systems engineering ［M］. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2005.
［13］RASMUSSEN J. Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem［J］. Safety science, 1997, 27(2): 183-213.
［14］LEVENSON N. Engineering a safer world: Systems thinking applied to safety ［M］. Cambridge: Mit Press, 2011.
［15］傅贵, 陆柏, 陈秀珍. 基于行为科学的组织安全管理方案模型［J］. 中国安全科学学报, 2005, 15(9): 21-27. FU Gui, LU Bai, CHEN Xiuzhen. Behavior based model for organizational safety management［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 2005, 15(9):21-27.
［16］傅贵, 殷文韬, 董继业. 行为安全 “2-4” 模型及其在煤矿安全管理中的应用［J］. 煤炭学报, 2013, 38(7): 1123-1129. FU Gui, YIN Wentao, DONG Jiye. Behavior-based accident causation: the “2-4”model and its safety implications in coal mine［J］.Journal of China Coal Society，2013，38（7）:1123-1129.
［17］傅贵, 樊运晓, 佟瑞鹏, 等. 通用事故原因分析方法（第4版）［J］. 事故预防学报, 2016, 2(1): 7-12. FU Gui, FAN Yunxiao, TONG Ruipeng, et al. A universal methodology for the causation analysis of accidents(4th Edition)［J］. Journal of Accident Prevention, 2016,2(1): 7-12.
［18］HOLLNAGEL E. FRAM. The functional resonance analysis method: modelling complex socio-technical systems ［M］. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2012.
［19］樊运晓, 卢明, 李智, 等. 基于危险属性的事故致因理论综述［J］. 中国安全科学学报, 2014, 24(11): 139-145. FAN Yunxiao, LU Ming, LI Zhi, et al. A review of accident modelling approaches based on components of hazards［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 2014, 24(11): 139-145.
［20］陈宝智, 吴敏. 事故致因理论与安全理念［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2008, 4(1): 42-46. CHEN Baozhi, WU Min. Etiologies of accident and safety concepts［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2008, 4(1): 42-46.
［21］覃容, 彭冬芝. 事故致因理论探讨［J］. 华北科技学院学报, 2005, 2(3): 1-10. QIN Rong, PENG Dongzhi. Discuss of the accident-causing theory［J］. Journal of North China Institute of Science and Technology, 2005, 2(3): 1-10.
［22］钟茂华, 魏玉东. 事故致因理论综述［J］. 火灾科学, 1999, 8(3): 36-42. ZHONG Maohua, WEI Yudong. Overview on accident-causing theories［J］. Fire Safety Science, 1999, 8(3): 36-42.
［23］SALMON P M, CORNELISSEN M, TROTTER M J. Systems-based accident analysis methods: A comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP［J］. Safety Science, 2012, 50(4): 1158-1170.
［24］HOLLNAGEL E. The ETTO principle: efficiency-thoroughness trade-off: why things that go right sometimes go wrong ［M］. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2009.

相似文献/References:

[1]冀成楼,张宏.工业事故调查和分析的发展历程及趋势[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(6):151.
　JI Cheng-lou,ZHANG Hong.The track of industrial incident investigation and analysis and developing trends[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(2):151.
[2]龙腾腾,王辉东,王秋华,等.高层建筑火灾事故致因理论模型构建研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):16.
　Long tengteng,Wang huidong,Wang qiuhua,et al.Research on model building with high-rise building fire accident-causing theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(2):16.
[3]张启波,袁凤丽,王清.硫酸储罐爆炸事故分析及预防[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(2):185.
　ZHANG Qi bo,YUAN Feng li,WANG Qing.Analysis and prevention on explosion accident of sulfuric acid tanks[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(2):185.
[4]刘〓盼,何启林,彭〓伟.EOC方法在煤矿安全生产事故中的应用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(10):135.
　LIU Pan,HE Qi lin,PENG Wei.Application research of EOC method in safety production accidents of coal mine[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(2):135.
[5]陈东锋,张国正,乔巍巍.军事飞行事故致因模型构建研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(4):135.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.04.025]
　Research on the construction of accident causing model for military flight accidents.Research on the construction of accidentcausing model  for military flight accidents[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(2):135.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.04.025]
[6]王振中,张卫华,吴锋棒.自助加油站典型静电事故案例分析及防范措施[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(7):169.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.07.031]
　WANG Zhen zhong,ZHANG Wei hua,WU Feng bang.Analysis and preventive measures on typical electrostatic accidents cases of selfservice refueling stations[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(2):169.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.07.031]
[7]佟淑娇,吴宗之,王如君,等.2001～2013年危险化学品企业较大以上事故统计分析及对策建议[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(3):129.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.03.021]
　TONG Shu-jiao,WU Zong-zhi,WANG Ru-jun,et al.Statistical analysis and countermeasures on larger and above grades accidents of dangerous chemical enterprises from 2001 to 2013[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(2):129.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.03.021]
[8]刘清友,唐洋,秦世宽,等.防提安全装置现场应用事故分析与规避措施[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(5):117.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.05.018]
　LIU Qing-you,TANG Yang,QIN Shi-kuan,et al.Accident cause analysis and avoidance measures for field application of anti-lifting safety device[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(2):117.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.05.018]
[9]朱珂,周科平.基于解释图的概率多规划识别事故分析方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(10):136.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.10.023]
　ZHU Ke,ZHOU Keping.Study on accident analysis method with probabilistic multiple plan recognition based on interpretation map[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(2):136.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.10.023]
[10]周琳,薛宇敬阳,刘希扬.事故的组织管理原因文献综述[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(10):185.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.10.031]
　ZHOU Lin,XUE Yujingyang,LIU Xiyang.Literature review on organization and management causes of accidents[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(2):185.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.10.031]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金重点项目 (51534008)
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-03-19