|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]孙瑞山,占欣.基于ISM—CRITIC法的通用航空可控飞行撞地影响因素分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(1):129-135.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.01.021]
　SUN Ruishan,ZHAN Xin.Analysis on influence factors of controlled flight into terrain of general aviation based on ISM-CRITIC method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(1):129-135.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.01.021]
点击复制

基于ISM—CRITIC法的通用航空可控飞行撞地影响因素分析
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
14
期数:
2018年1期
页码:
129-135
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2018-01-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis on influence factors of controlled flight into terrain of general aviation based on ISM-CRITIC method
文章编号:
1673-193X(2018)-01-0129-07
作者:
孙瑞山1; 2; 占欣1; 2
（1.中国民航大学 飞行技术学院，天津 300300；2. 中国民航大学 民航安全科学研究所，天津 300300）
Author(s):
SUN Ruishan1; 2;  ZHAN Xin1; 2
(1. Flight Technology Collage, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China; 2. Research Institute of Civil Aviation Safety, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China)
关键词:
通用航空; 可控飞行撞地; 基元事件分析法; 解释结构模型; CRITIC法
Keywords:
general aviation;  controlled flight into terrain;  element event analysis method;  interpretation structure model (ISM);  CRITIC method
分类号:
X949
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.01.021
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了研究通用航空可控飞行撞地的影响因素，提出针对性的预防措施，采用基元事件分析法对中国民航安全办公室不安全数据库中2006—2015年间发生的30起通用航空可控飞行撞地事件进行分析，建立通用航空可控飞行撞地影响因素体系；运用解释结构模型对影响因素进行两两对比分析，建立3层阶梯有向模型；运用CRITIC法计算各影响因素权重并排序。结果表明：影响通用航空可控飞行撞地事件的表层直接原因分别是注意力分配不当、违反标准运行程序、安全意识淡薄、应急能力弱、导航设备失效、发动机失效、其他天气意外、飞行保障不利和组织混乱；中层间接原因分别是驾驶技能不足、航前准备不足、机组资源管理欠缺、地形复杂、能见度和光线刺激；深层根本原因分别是疲劳驾驶、公司违规和违法组织飞行；影响通用航空可控飞行撞地事件发生的主要因素分别是飞行保障不利和组织混乱、航前准备不足、安全意识淡薄、驾驶技能不足和违反标准运行程序。
Abstract:
In order to study the influence factors of controlled flight into terrain of general aviation, and propose the targeted prevention measures, 30 controlled flight into terrain events of general aviation occurred from 2006 to 2015 in the unsafe database of China Civil Aviation Safety Office were analyzed by using the element event analysis method, and an influence factor system of controlled flight into terrain of general aviation was estab-lished. The pairwise comparative analysis on the influence factors was carried out by using the interpretation structure model (ISM), then a three-layer ladder directed model was established, and the weights of each influ-ence factor were calculated and sorted by using the CRITIC method. The results showed that the surface direct causes of controlled flight into terrain of general aviation were the improper distribution of attention, violation of standard operating procedures, weak safety awareness, weak emergency response capacity, failure of navigation equipment, failure of engine, other weather accidents, unfavorable flight support and organizational chaos respec-tively, and the middle indirect causes were the inadequate driving skills, inadequate pre-flight preparation, lack of crew resource management, complex terrain, visibility and light stimulation respectively, while the deep root causes were the fatigue driving, company violation and illegal organization of flights respectively. The main fac-tors influencing the occurrence of controlled flight into terrain of general aviation were the unfavorable flight support and organizational chaos, inadequate pre-flight preparation, weak safety awareness, inadequate driving skills and violation of standard operating procedures respectively.

参考文献/References:

［1］Controlled Flight Into Terrain Accident Analysis Report［R］. International Air Transport Association，2014.
［2］A Study of Terrain Awareness Warning System Capability and Human Factors in CFIT Accidents 2005-2014［R］. International Air Transport Association，2015.
［3］杜红兵,王雪莉. 基于贝叶斯网络的可控飞行撞地事故原因分析方法［J］. 安全与环境学报，2009，9(5):136-139. DU Hongbing，WANG Xueli. Cause analysis of the controlled flight into terrain based on the Bayesian network［J］.Journal Safety and Environment，2009，9(5):136-139.
［4］张晓全，吴贵锋. 功能共振事故模型在可控飞行撞地事故分析中的应用［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术，2011，7(4):65-70. ZHANG Xiaoquan，WU Guifeng. Application of FRAM model in CFIT accident analysis［J］.China Safety Science Journal，2011，7(4):65-70.
［5］LOOMIS J P, PORTER R F. The performance of warning systems in avoiding controlled-flight-into-terrain accidents［J］. Aviation Space & Environmental Medicine, 1982, 53(11):1085.
［6］ARTHUR III J J, PRINZEL III L J, KRAMER L J, et al. CFIT prevention using synthetic vision［C］// SPIE.Enhanced and Synthetic Vision 2003. Bellingham: SPIE，2003: 146-157.
［7］刘汉辉，孙瑞山，张秀山. 基元事件分析法［J］. 中国民航大学学报，1997(3):1-9. LIU Hanhui，SUN Ruishan, ZHANG Xiushan.A method of basic element analysis of aviation acci-dents［J］.Journal of Civil Aviation university of China,1997(3):1-9.
［8］田水承，梁清，马文赛，等. 煤矿瓦斯爆炸险兆事件致因模型构建［J］. 煤矿安全，2017，48(4):226-229，233. TIAN Shuicheng，LIANG Qing，MA Wensai，et al. Causal model construction of coal mine gas explosion near-miss accidents［J］.Safety in Coal Mines，2017，48(4): 226-229，233.
［9］BEIKKHAKHIAN Y, JAVANMARDI M, KARBASIAN M, et al. The application of ISM model in evaluating agile suppliers selection criteria and ranking suppliers using fuzzy TOPSIS-AHP methods［J］. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(15): 6224-6236.
［10］赵志峰,文虎,樊恒,等.粗糙集和熵权计算法在多因素指标评价中的应用［J］.中国安全生产科学技术，2017，13(9): 180-184. ZHAO Zhifeng，WEN Hu，FAN Heng，et al. Application of rough set and entropy weight calculation method in the multi-factor index evaluation［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2017,13(9):180-184.
［11］孙捷. 组合赋权法在线性工程线路方案环境比选中的应用［J］. 环境科学与技术,2012,35(7):202-205. SUN Jie.Application of combination weighting method for environmental comparison and selection of Line schemes in linear engineering［J］. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 35(7):202-205.
［12］DIAKOULAKI D，MAVROATAS G, PAPAYANNAKIS L. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method［J］. Computers & Operations Research，1995, 22(7):763-770.
［13］王昆, 宋海洲. 三种客观权重赋权法的比较分析［J］. 技术经济与管理研究, 2003(6):48-49. WANG Kun，SONG Haizhou. A comparative analysis of three kinds of objective weighting method ［J］. Technoeconomics & Management Research, 2003(6): 48-49.

相似文献/References:

[1]张晓全,吴贵锋.功能共振事故模型在可控飞行撞地事故分析中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(4):65.
　ZHANG Xiao-quan,WU Gui-feng.Application of FRAM model in CFIT accident analysis[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(1):65.
[2]许红军,田俊改.通用航空安全体系自组织演化动力学机制与模式研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(3):135.
　XU Hong jun,TIAN Jun gai.Research on dynamics mechanism and mode of general aviation safety management  system selforganizing evolvement[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(1):135.
[3]陈农田,周长春,谭鑫.我国通用航空安全监管问题研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(3):198.
　CHEN Nong tian,ZHOU Chang chun,TAN Xin.Discussion on safety supervision of civil general aviation[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(1):198.
[4]陈勇刚.我国通用航空安全管理体系建设研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(6):216.
　CHEN Yong gang.Study on safety management system of general aviation in China[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(1):216.
[5]高扬,王向章.基于G1-DEMATEL法的通用航空维修安全影响因素研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(2):164.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2016.02.030]
　GAO Yang,WANG Xiangzhang.Research on influence factors of maintenance safety in general aviation based on G1-DEMATEL method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(1):164.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2016.02.030]
[6]占艳丽,王鹏,郭勇陈,等.基于SD-ABMS方法的航空应急医疗转运任务仿真系统[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(12):54.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.12.008]
　ZHAN Yanli,WANG Peng,GUO Yongchen,et al.Simulation system of aeromedical emergency transport mission based on SDABMS method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(1):54.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.12.008]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金项目（U1333112）
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-02-12