[1]杨慧,李新宏,陈国明,等.老龄海底油气管道弃置决策研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(11):73-78.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.11.012]
YANG Hui,LI Xinhong,CHEN Guoming,et al.Research on abandon decision-making for aging submarine oil & gas pipeline[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(11):73-78.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.11.012]
点击复制
老龄海底油气管道弃置决策研究
YANG Hui,LI Xinhong,CHEN Guoming,et al.Research on abandon decision-making for aging submarine oil & gas pipeline[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(11):73-78.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.11.012]
《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]
- 卷:
- 13
- 期数:
- 2017年11期
- 页码:
- 73-78
- 栏目:
- 职业安全卫生管理与技术
- 出版日期:
- 2017-11-30
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Research on abandon decision-making for aging submarine oil & gas pipeline
- 文章编号:
- 1673-193X(2017)-11-0073-06
- Keywords:
- aging submarine oil & gas pipeline; abandon decision-making model; multi-attribute utility theory; cost-benefit ratio; fuzzy judgment
- 分类号:
- TE973
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 针对我国老龄海底油气管道在弃置决策上缺少理论依据的问题，建立老龄海底油气管道弃置决策模型的结构流程，基于多属性效用理论，从4个维度进行分析，选取影响老龄海底管道安全寿命的工程因素、结构因素、风险因素和影响决策的成本因素，构建属性树；运用模糊理论建立模糊互补判断矩阵，综合专家意见计算各属性权重，并进行影响因素敏感性分析；确定老龄海底管道弃置决策评分准则，对属性树各因素取值进行量化，引入成本效益率量化成本因素；采用逻辑运算计算综合得分，根据综合得分进行弃置决策。工程实例应用表明：相比于传统决策方法仅凭设计寿命作为弃置依据，老龄海底管道弃置决策模型不仅避免了单一性，还能反应服役环境对管道的影响，有利于提高管道服役过程的经济性和安全性。
- Abstract:
- Aiming at the lack of theoretical basis for abandon decision-making of aging submarine oil & gas pipeline in China, the structure process of abandon decision-making model for aging submarine pipeline was established. An attribute tree was set up based on the multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT) by analyzing four dimensions including the engineering factor, structure factor, risk factor, which influence the safety life of aging pipeline, and the cost factor, which influence the decision-making. The fuzzy complementary judgment matrix was established by adopting the fuzzy theory, and the weight of every factor was calculated based on the viewpoints of experts, then the sensitivity analysis of influencing factors was carried out. The scoring criteria of abandon decision-making for aging submarine pipeline were determined, then the valuing of each factor in the attribute tree was quantified, and the cost-benefit ratio was introduced to quantity the cost factor. The comprehensive score was calculated by the logical operation, and the abandon decision was made according to the comprehensive score. The engineering case application showed that, compared with traditional decision-making method, in which the abandon decision is made only by the design life, the abandon decision-making model of aging submarine pipeline can avoid the unicity and reflect the influence of service environment on the pipeline, which is beneficial to improve the economy and safety of pipelines in servicing.
参考文献/References:
［1］夏雪. 腐蚀海底管道的可靠性评估 ［D］.哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2009.
［2］郑贤斌. 老龄输油管道安全评估与维修决策方法及应用研究［D］. 青岛:中国石油大学(华东), 2007.
［3］Caleyo F, González J L, Hallen J M. A study on the reliability assessment methodology for pipelines with active corrosion defects［J］. International Journal of Pressure Vessels & Piping, 2002, 79(1):77-86.
［4］Teixeira A P, Soares C G, Netto T A, et al. Reliability of pipelines with corrosion defects［J］. International Journal of Pressure Vessels & Piping, 2008, 85(4):228-237..
［5］方华灿, 赵学年, 陈国明. 海底管线腐蚀缺陷的安全可靠性评估［J］. 石油矿场机械, 2001, 30(6): 1-4.
FANG Huacan, ZHAO Xuenian, CHEN Guoming. Reliability evaluation of corrosion defect of the subsea pipeline［J］. Oil Field Equipment 2001, 30(6): 1-4.
［6］李新宏, 朱红卫, 陈国明,等. 海底油气管道泄漏事故风险分析的贝叶斯动态模型［J］. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(4):75-80.
LI Xinhong ZHU Hongwei CHEN Guoming, et al. Bayesian dynamic model for analyzing risk of meeting submarine oil and gas pipeline leakage accident［J］.China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(4):75-80.
［7］LI Xinhong, CHEN Guoming, ZHU Hongwei. Quantitative risk analysis on leakage failure of submarine oil and gas pipelines using Bayesian network［J］. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2016, 103(A): 163-173.
［8］谭开忍, 肖熙. 基于灰色理论的海底管道腐蚀剩余寿命预测方法［J］. 上海交通大学学报, 2007, 41(2):186-188..
TAN Kairen, XIAO Xi. The forecast of remaining life of corrosive submarine pipelines based on grey theory［J］. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2007,41(2):186-188.
［9］Liu Q M, Lyu W. The forecasting residual life of underground pipeline based on particle swarm optimisation algorithm［J］. Machinery Design & Manufacture, 2009, 1(4):270-275.
［10］LI Xinhong，ZHU Hongwei，CHEN Guoming，et al. Optimal maintenance strategy for corroded subsea pipelines［J］. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2017, 49: 145-154.
［11］Muhlbauer W K. 管道风险管理手册［M］. 2版.杨嘉瑜,张德存,李钦华,等,译.北京:中国石化出版社,2005: 199-216.
［12］Noor N M, Yahaya N, Din M M, et al. Prediction of corroding pipeline remaining life-time using semi-probabilistic approach［J］. Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2010, 21(1):204-218.
［13］李秀美,陈国明,朱红卫,等.老龄油气管道安全寿命综合评估方法研究［J］. 工业安全与环保，2016(8): 39-43.
LI Xiumei，CHEN Guoming，ZHU Hongwei，et al. A comprehensive safety life evaluation method of aging oil and gas pipeline［J］. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2016(8): 39-43.
［14］王芳, 孙利华. 多属性效用理论在效果评价中的应用［J］. 中国药事, 2009, 23(7):637-638.
WANG Fang，SUN Lihua. The application of multi-attribute utility theory in the evaluation of drugs' effectiveness［J］.Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs, 2009, 23(7):637-638.
［15］范英，李辰，晋民杰，等.三角模糊数和层次分析法在风险评价中的应用研究［J］.中国安全科学学报，2014，24(7): 70-74.
FAN Ying，LI Chen，JIN Minjie，et al. Research on application of triangular fuzzy number and AHP in risk evaluation［J］. China Safety Science Journal,2014, 24(7): 70-74.
［16］Boardman A E, Greenberg D, Vining A R, et al. Cost-benefit analysis : concepts and practice ［M］. 2nd ed.Upper Saddle River,Prentice Hall, 2011: 348-352.
［17］Buckley J J. Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis［M］// Uncertainty in Risk Assessment, Risk Management, and Decision Making. Springer US, 1987:233-247.
相似文献/References:
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
- 国家重点研发计划课题（2016YFC0802305，2017YFC0804501）
