|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]安景文,安娴,王龙康,等.基于犹豫模糊集的生产安全事故应急预案评估研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(5):128-133.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.05.021]
 AN Jingwen,AN Xian,WANG Longkang,et al.Study on evaluation of emergency plan for work safety accident based on hesitant fuzzy set[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(5):128-133.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.05.021]
点击复制

基于犹豫模糊集的生产安全事故应急预案评估研究
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
13
期数:
2017年5期
页码:
128-133
栏目:
现代职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2017-05-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on evaluation of emergency plan for work safety accident based on hesitant fuzzy set
文章编号:
1673-193X(2017)-05-0128-06
作者:
安景文安娴王龙康李璐
中国矿业大学北京管理学院,北京 100083
Author(s):
AN Jingwen AN Xian WANG Longkang LI Lu
School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
关键词:
犹豫模糊集集值迭代安全生产应急预案
Keywords:
hesitant fuzzy set set-valued iterationproduction safety emergency planhesitant fuzzy set set valued iteration work safety emergency plan
分类号:
X936
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.05.021
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了全面有效评估企业生产安全事故应急预案,提出了1种基于犹豫模糊集的评估方法。在借鉴相关学者研究成果的基础上,从应急预案的合法性、全面性、科学性、经济性和可操作性等5个维度,构建了生产安全事故应急预案评估指标体系;运用集值迭代法确定各评价指标的权重,并提出基于犹豫模糊集的企业应急预案评估方法;最后进行实例分析。研究结果表明:该方法对评估生产安全事故应急预案具有一定的参考价值。
Abstract:
In order to evaluate the emergency plan for work safety accident in enterprise fully and effectively, an evaluation method based on hesitant fuzzy set was put forward. An evaluation index system of emergency plan for work safety accident was constructed from five dimensions, such as legality, comprehensiveness, science, economy and operability of emergency plan, on the basis of referring to the relevant academic research achievements. The weight of each evaluation index was determined by using the set valued iteration method, and the evaluation method of enterprise's emergency plan based on hesitant fuzzy set was proposed. Finally, the practical case analysis was conducted. The results showed that it has certain guiding significance for the evaluation of emergency plan for work safety accident in enterprise.

参考文献/References:

[1]张丽,柏萍,等.基于层次分析与模糊综合评价的事故应急预案评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(9):126-131. ZHANG Li,BAI Ping,et al. Assessment of accident emergency plan based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2015,11(9): 126-131.
[2]张英菊. 基于灰色多层次评价方法的应急预案实施效果评价模型研究[J].计算机应用研究,2012,29(9):3312-3319. ZHANG Yingju. Research on implementation effect evaluation model of emergencyplans based on multi-level and grey evaluation method[J].Application Research of Computers,2012,29(9):3312-3319.
[3]常建鹏,周国华,陈振颂,等. 考虑专家行为偏好与指标关联的铁路应急预案评估研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2016,22(5):1371-1385. CHANG Jianpeng, ZHOU Guohua, CHEN Zhensong, et al.Evaluation of railway emergency plans considering experts’ behaviorpreferences and indexes correlation[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems,2016,22(5):1371-1385.
[4]苟敏,李夏苗,等.基于Vague集的铁路应急预案评价方法[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(1):75-79. GOU Min,LI Xiamiao,et al.Evaluation method of railway emergency plan based on vague set [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2016,12(1): 75-79.
[5]樊自甫,王蕾.基于流程的通信保障应急预案有效性评估模型及应用[J].科技管理研究,2016(1):185-189. FAN Zifu,WANG Lei. The effectiveness evaluation model of emergency plans of communication support based on the procedure and its application [J].Science and Technology Management Research,2016(1):185-189.
[6]张士辰,龙智飞. 水库突发事件应急预案可行性评价方法再研究[J].水利水运工程学报,2016(2):83-88. ZHANG Shichen, LONG Zhifei. Researchonevaluationmethodofpredictabilityfordam failureemergencyplan[J].Hydro-science and Engineering,2016(2):83-88.
[7]郭子雪,张强. 基于直觉模糊集的突发事件应急预案评估[J].数学的实践与认识,2008,38(22):64-69. GUO Zixue, ZHANG Qiang. The evaluation of emergency plans based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Mathematics in Practice and Theory,2008,38(22):64-69.
[8]郭亚军. 综合评价理论、方法及拓展[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.
[9]杨军.中小学教育信息化评价指标体系构建[J]. 吉林大学学报,2015,33(3):344-349. YANG Jun.Construction of evaluation index system for educationalinformatization of primary and secondary schools[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Information Science Edition), 2015,33(3):344-349.
[10]刘小花,詹庆东. 基于整合 BSC 和集值迭代法的高校图书馆战略绩效评估[J]. 图书馆,2012(1):92-95. LIU Xiaohua, ZHAN Qingdong. Strategic performance evaluation of academic library based on integrated BSC and value iteration methods[J].Library,2012(1):92-95.
[11]Torra V’ Namkawa Y. On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision[A]. The 18th IEEE. International Conference on Fuzzy Systems[C]. Jeju Island,Korea,2009, 1378-1382.
[12]葛涛,万昆,等. 基于犹豫模糊三角函数的水利项目评价[J].技术经济,2014,33(9):125-130. GE Tao, WAN Kun,et al. Evaluation on hydraulic project based on hesitant triangular fuzzy function[J]. Technology Economics,2014,33(9):125-130.
[13]吴良刚,周赛军. 基于犹豫模糊软集的多准则决策方法[J].模糊系统与数学,2016,33(1):108-119. WU Lianggang, ZHOU Saijun. Multi-criteria decision making approach based on hesitant fuzzy soft set[J].Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics,2016,33(1):108-119.
[14]陈莹颖.基于Gl-犹豫模糊评价方法的互联网金融软实力评价[D].广州:华南理工大学,2015.
[15]王坚强,吴佳亭. 基于优序关系的犹豫模糊语言多准则决策方法[J].控制与决策,2015,30(5):887-891. WANG Jianqiang, WU Jiating. Method for multi-criteria decision-making with hesitant fuzzy linguisticbased on outranking relation[J].Control and Decision,2015,30(5):887-891.
[16]周小强.软集与犹豫模糊集理论及其在决策中的应用[D].长沙:湖南大学,2014.
[17]Xiang Gu, Ying Wang, Bei Yang. A method for hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making and its application to riskInvestment[J]. Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 2011,6(6).

相似文献/References:

[1]王娟,戴凤威,方博.煤矿事故应急响应的风险决策研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(6):21.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.06.003]
 WANG Juan,DAI Fengwei,FANG Bo.Research on risk decisionmaking of emergency response to coal mine accidents[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(5):21.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.06.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
“十二五”国家科技支撑计划项目(2015BAK10B00);中国博士后科学基金项目(2016M591288)
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-06-09