|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]吴忠广,申瑞君,万福茂,等.岩质高边坡运营安全风险评估指标体系研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(5):108-115.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.05.018]
　WU Zhongguang,SHEN Ruijun,WAN Fumao,et al.Research on index system of risk assessment on operation safety of high rock slope[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(5):108-115.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.05.018]
点击复制

岩质高边坡运营安全风险评估指标体系研究
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
13
期数:
2017年5期
页码:
108-115
栏目:
现代职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2017-05-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on index system of risk assessment on operation safety of high rock slope
文章编号:
1673-193X(2017)-05-0108-08
作者:
吴忠广1; 2; 3 ; 申瑞君1; 2; 万福茂1; 2; 张迪1; 2
1.交通运输部科学研究院，北京 100029；2.交科院检测技术北京有限公司，北京 100013；3.北京科技大学 土木与资源工程学院，北京 100083
Author(s):
WU Zhongguang1; 2; 3;  SHEN Ruijun1; 2;  WAN Fumao1; 2;  ZHANG Di1; 2
1. China Academy of Transportation Sciences, Ministry of Transport, Beijing 100029, China; 2. CATS Test Technology Beijing Co. Ltd., Beijing 100013, China; 3. School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
关键词:
高边坡; 运营安全; 风险; 评估指标; 体系
Keywords:
high slope;  operation safety;  risk;  assessment index;  system
分类号:
X913.4
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.05.018
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为建立高速公路岩质高边坡风险评估指标体系，针对指标选取代表性不足、指标分级阈值缺少定量判据、指标获取困难等问题，采用逐坡普查与重点调查、工程地质类比与复核、现场监测与数值计算相结合的方法，提出了岩质高边坡运营安全风险评估指标体系。包括边坡断面几何特征、水的影响、边坡岩体结构、支挡加固设施及边坡破坏模式等5个一级指标与坡高、坡度等15个二级指标，并确定了量化分级标准与取值方法。评估结果表明：指标体系适用性较强，为后续评估运营安全风险奠定了基础。
Abstract:
In order to establish the risk assessment index system of high rock slope in expressway, aiming at the problems about the insufficient representativeness of index selection, the lacking of quantitative criterion for the index grading threshold, and the difficult index acquisition etc., an index system of risk assessment on operation safety of high rock slope was put forward by using the combined methods of the general investigation on slope one by one with the key survey, the engineering geology analogy with the review, and the field monitoring with the numerical calculation. The index system includes five first-level indexes, which are the geometrical characteristics of slope section, the water impact, the rock mass structure of slope, the support and reinforcement facilities, and the slope failure mode, as well as fifteen second-level indexes, which are slope height, slope gradient, and so on. The quantified grading standard and the value taking method were determined. The assessment results showed that the index system has a relatively strong applicability, which provides a basis for subsequent risk assessment on operation safety.

参考文献/References:

［1］张从明，李国锋,等.公路边坡治理措施及安全评价方法［M］．北京: 人民交通出版社，2009:83-92.
［2］付贤炜.某运营高速公路边坡病害评价分析及治理［J］.土工基础, 2015,29(2):21-24. FU Xianwei. Hazard evaluation of live trafficked highway slopes-case history study of a highway K36+220 to K36+485 ［J］.Soil Eng. and Foundation, 2015,29(2):21-24.
［3］张建伟，廖小平，魏土荣.高速公路运营期高边坡安全风险评估体系研究［J］.路基工程, 2015(6):197-203. ZHANG Jianwei, LIAO Xiaoping, WEI Turong. Study on safety risk assessment system for high slope of highway in operation［J］. Subgrade Engineering, 2015(6):197-203.
［4］王晓雪.高等级公路运营期边坡风险因素评估及对策研究［D］. 上海：同济大学,2008.
［5］马惠民，王恭先，周德培.山区高速公路高边坡病害防治实例［M］．北京: 人民交通出版社，2006:82-111
［6］李志宏.基于全寿命期风险分析的路堑与隧道方案决策研究［D］. 上海：同济大学,2010
［7］浙江省交通投资集团有限公司.高速公路高边坡检查评价标准［R］．浙江：浙江省交通投资集团有限公司,2011. Zhejiang Communication Investment Group Co., Ltd., Inspection and evaluation standard for Expressway high slope［R］. Zhejiang: Zhejiang Communication Investment Group Co., Ltd., 2011.
［8］吴忠广,王海燕,陶连金,等.高速公路高边坡施工安全总体风险评估方法［J］.中国安全科学学报,2014,24(12): 124-129. WU Zhongguang, WANG Haiyan, TAO Lianjin, et al. Method for general risk assessment of highway high slope in construction safety［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 2014, 24(12): 124-129.
［9］何俊材，朱恒忠.基于事故树理论的露天矿山边坡失稳分析［J］.现代矿业,2014,1(1): 85-88. HE Juncai, ZHU Hengzhong. Instability analysis of open pit mine slope based on fault tree theory［J］.Modern Mining, 2014,1(1): 85-88.
［10］交通运输部安全与质量监督管理司.高速公路路堑高边坡工程施工安全风险评估指南［M］．北京: 人民交通出版社，2015：101-103．
［11］Rita L.Sousa, Herbert H. Einstein. Risk analysis during tunnel construction using Bayesian Networks: Porto Metro case study［J］. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012,27:86-100.
［12］Limao Zhang, Xianguo Wu, Miroslaw J. Skibniewski, etc. Bayesian-network-based safety risk analysis in construction projects［J］. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2014,131:29-39.
［13］Limao Zhang, Xianguo Wu, Lieyun Ding, et al. Decision support analysis for safety control in complex project environments based on Bayesian Networks［J］. Expert Systems with Applications.2013,40:4273-4282.
［14］吴树仁，石菊松，王涛,等.滑坡风险评估理论与技术［M］．北京:科学出版社，2012:31-32.
［15］浙江省交通投资集团有限公司.高速公路高边坡安全风险检查评估指引（试行）［R］．浙江：浙江省交通投资集团有限公司，2012. Zhejiang Communication Investment Group Co., Ltd., Guidelines for slope ranking system(trial edition) ［R］. Zhejiang: Zhejiang Communication Investment Group Co., Ltd., 2012.
［16］孙家齐，陈新民.工程地质（第4版）［M］．武汉:武汉理工大学出版社，2011:31-42.

相似文献/References:

[1]陈少辉,张智宇,谢贤平,等.晋宁磷矿高边坡对爆破振动的动态响应与安全分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(11):41.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.11.007]
　CHEN Shao-hui,ZHANG Zhi-yu,XIE Xian-ping,et al.Dynamic response and safety analysis of blasting vibration effectson high slope of Jinning phosphorus open-pit[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(5):41.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.11.007]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目（20157401）
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-06-09