|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张江石,王 帅,闫明伟,等.煤矿不同群体间安全文化认知的比较研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(1):128-133.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.01.021]
 ZHANG Jiangshi,WANG Shuai,YAN Mingwei,et al.Comparative study on safety culture cognition among different groups in coal mine[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(1):128-133.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.01.021]
点击复制

煤矿不同群体间安全文化认知的比较研究
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
13
期数:
2017年1期
页码:
128-133
栏目:
现代职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2017-01-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative study on safety culture cognition among different groups in coal mine
文章编号:
1673-193X(2017)-01-0128-06
作者:
张江石王 帅闫明伟许培辉王亚萌
中国矿业大学北京资源与安全工程学院,北京 100083
Author(s):
ZHANG Jiangshi WANG Shuai YAN Mingwei XU Peihui WANG Yameng
School of Resource and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
关键词:
不同煤矿群体安全文化认知安全文化元素比较研究
Keywords:
different groups in coal mine safety culture cognition safety culture element comparative study
分类号:
X921
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.01.021
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探究煤矿企业不同群体员工对安全文化认知的差异,将企业员工划分为管理层、专业人员、班组长和一线员工4类群体。通过问卷和SCAP(safety culture analysis program)系统分析等方法,对南阳矿业公司下属3个煤矿中的150名员工进行了安全文化认知水平测评,并利用SPSS 18.0对所得数据进行处理。结果表明:不同群体间安全文化认知水平存在显著差异,样本群体对于企业理念理解、安全业绩、员工违章3个要素认知水平较低;管理层、专业人员、班组长和一线员工安全文化认知水平得分分别为74.4,75,76.4和73.2,其中,班组长的安全文化认知水平最高,一线员工的安全文化认知水平最低,且管理层人员的安全文化认知水平较国际上安全业绩最好企业的同类人员偏低,差值达19.2分。
Abstract:
In order to explore the differences of safety culture cognition among different groups of employees in coal mine enterprises, the employees were divided into four groups of management, professional staff, team leader and front-line staff. The questionnaire survey and SCAP (safety culture analysis program) system analysis were used to carry out the assessment on safety culture cognition level of 150 employees in three coal mines of Nanyang Mining Company, and the data were processed by SPSS 18.0. The results showed that there were significant differences in the level of safety culture cognition among different groups, and the sample groups had lower cognition level on three elements including enterprise philosophy understanding, safety performance and employee violation. The scores of safety culture cognition level for management, professional staff, team leader and front-line staff were 74.4, 75, 76.4 and 73.2 respectively. Among which, the team leader had the highest level of safety culture cognition, and the safety culture cognition level of front-line staff was the lowest. The safety culture cognition level of the management was lower than that of the similar personnel in the international enterprise with the best safety performance, and the difference reached 19.2 points.

参考文献/References:

[1]傅贵. 安全管理学-事故预防的行为控制方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013.
[2]贺阿红, 傅贵, 张江石, 等. 安全文化手册设计研究[J]. 煤矿安全, 2013, 44(4): 220-223. HE Ahong, FU Gui, ZHANG Jiangshi, et al. Study on the design of safety culture manual[J]. Coal Mine Safety, 2013, 44(4): 220-223.
[3]王祥尧. 安全文化定量测量的理论与实证研究[D]. 北京:中国矿业大学(北京), 2011.
[4]王丹, 宫晶晶. 领导行为、安全文化与矿工安全行为的结构方程模型[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2016, 12(9): 125-129. WANG Dan, GONG Jingjing. SEM of leadership behavior, safety culture and safety behavior of miners[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2016, 12(9): 125-129.
[5]曹庆仁, 李凯, 李静林. 管理者行为对矿工不安全行为的影响关系研究[J]. 管理科学, 2011, 21(12) :121-129. CAO Qingren, LI Kai, LI Jinglin. Impact of manager’s behavior on coalminer’s unsafe behavior[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2011, 21(12): 121-129.
[6]王君玲. 建筑企业安全文化对安全绩效影响的实证研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2014, 10(8): 125-129. WANG Junling. Empirical study on influence of safety culture to safety performance of construction enterprises[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2014, 10(8): 125-129.
[7]Guldenmund, F.W. The nature of safety culture: A review of theory and research [J]. Safety Science, 2000, 34: 215-257.
[8]Edwards JRD, Davey J, Armstrong K. Returning to the roots of culture: A review and re-conceptualization of safety culture [J]. Safety Science, 2013, 55:70-80.
[9]傅贵, 何冬云, 张苏, 等. 再论安全文化的定义及建设水平评估指标[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(4): 140-145. FU Gui, HE Dongyun, ZHANG Su, et al. Further discussions on definition of safety culture and its assessment indicators[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(4): 140-145.
[10]毛海峰, 郭晓宏. 企业安全文化建设体系及其多维结构研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(12): 3-8. MAO Haifeng, GUO Xiaohong. A research on enterprise safety culture developing system and its multidimensional structure[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(12): 3-8.
[11]施波, 王秉, 吴超. 企业安全文化认同机理及其影响因素[J]. 科技管理研究, 2016(16): 195-200. SHI Bo, WANG Bing, WU Chao. Study on the mechanism and influencing factors of the identification of enterprise safety culture[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2016(16): 195-200.
[12]程南. 群体动力视角下的煤矿员工不安全行为管理研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2014.
[13]国家安全生产监督管理总局.企业安全文化建设评价准则:AQ/T 9005-2008[S].北京:煤炭工业出版社,2009.
[14]国家安全生产监督管理总局. 国家安全监管总局关于开展安全文化建设示范企业创建活动的指导意见[L]. 安监总政法(2010)5号, 2010.
[15]行为安全网. 安全文化元素(理念)条目[EB/OL]. http://safetyscience.cn/page/aqwh/161.php.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金项目(51174209);北京市社会科学基金项目(16GLB027)
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-03-02