|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]刘朝峰,等.火灾后既有结构混凝土损伤评估的突变模型[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(12):33-36.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.12.005]
 LIU Chaofeng,DU Liheng,GUO Xiaodong,et al.Catastrophe model for assessment on concrete damage of post-fire existing structure[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(12):33-36.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.12.005]
点击复制

火灾后既有结构混凝土损伤评估的突变模型
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
12
期数:
2016年12期
页码:
33-36
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2016-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Catastrophe model for assessment on concrete damage of post-fire existing structure
文章编号:
1673-193X(2016)-12-0033-04
作者:
刘朝峰1 2杜丽衡1 2郭小东3李岩峰1 2
(1.河北工业大学 土木与交通学院,天津 300401; 2. 河北省土木工程技术研究中心,天津 300401;3. 北京工业大学 抗震减灾研究所,北京 100124)
Author(s):
LIU Chaofeng12 DU Liheng12 GUO Xiaodong3 LI Yanfeng12
(1. College of Civil and Transportation, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China; 2. Technology and Research Center of Civil Engineering, Hebei Province, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China; 3. Institute of Earthquake Resistance and Disaster Reduction, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)
关键词:
混凝土火灾损伤突变理论损伤系数抗压强度
Keywords:
concrete fire damage catastrophe theory damage coefficient compressive strength
分类号:
X947
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.12.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了充分考虑火灾后混凝土损伤的多种控制因素,简便而可靠的混凝土损伤综合评估方法,选取抗压强度、耐久性、爆裂和裂纹等4个损失系数为评价指标,采用突变理论的归一化公式和突变原则,构建火灾后混凝土损伤综合评估的突变模型,并予以工程实例分析。结果表明:该方法与模糊综合法、投影寻踪法、分形插值法、属性识别法、可拓物元法的评价结果具有较好的一致性,评价结果客观准确,是一种简单实用的火灾后混凝土损伤综合评估新方法。
Abstract:
In order to fully consider various control factors of the post-fire concrete damage and develop a simple and reliable method to comprehensively assess concrete damage, four damage coefficients including compressive strength, durability, burst and crack were selected as the assessment indexes. A catastrophe model for comprehensive assessment on post-fire concrete damage was constructed by using the normalized formulas and catastrophe principles of catastrophe theory, and the engineering case analysis was conducted. The results showed that the evaluation result by this method has a good consistency with those by the fuzzy synthetic method, projection pursuit method, fractal interpolation method, attribute recognition method and extension matter-element method. The evaluation result is objective and accurate, which verifies that the model is a simple and practical new method to comprehensively assess the post-fire concrete damage.

参考文献/References:

[1]王子毅, 韩阳, 王威. 火灾后混凝土损伤综合评价的分形-插值模型[J]. 混凝土, 2012,34(2): 44-47. WANG Ziyi, HAN Yang, WANG Wei. Fractal interpolation model for comprehensive evaluation on the degree of fire-damage concrete[J]. Concrete, 2012,34(2): 44-47.
[2]方崇, 杨绿峰, 梁汉吉. 投影寻踪在火灾后混凝土性能评价中的应用[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2010, 46(25):199-202. FANG Chong, YANG Lyufeng, LIANG Hanji. Application of projection pursuit evaluation in properties of high strength concrete after exposed to fire[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2010, 46(25):199-202.
[3]王威, 苏经宇, 韩阳, 等. 火灾后混凝土损伤综合评价的物元模型[J]. 混凝土, 2008, 30(1): 20-22. WANG Wei, SU Jingyu, HAN Yang, et al. A matter element model for comprehensive evaluation on the degree of fire-damage concrete[J]. Concrete, 2008, 30(1): 20-22.
[4]李敏. 高强混凝土受火损伤及其综合评价研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2005.
[5]张宏, 邵永军. 火灾后混凝土桥梁损伤评估方法与应用[J]. 四川建筑科学研究, 2011, 37(3): 95-100. ZHANG Hong, SHAO Yongjun. Fire damage assessment method and application for concrete bridge[J]. Sichuan Building Science, 2011, 37(3): 95-99.
[6]苗吉军, 刘芳, 刘延春, 等. 考虑海洋环境损伤的钢筋混凝土梁抗火性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2014, 35(9): 64-71. MIAO Jijun, LIU Fang, LIUYanchun, et al. Experimental research on fire resistance performance for RC beams with damages caused by marine environment[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2014, 35(9):64-71.
[7]王粟. 基于灰色关联分析的高层建筑火灾风险评估[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2013, 9(8): 83-89. WANG Su. Fire risk assessment of high-rise buildings based on grey relational analysis[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2013, 9(8): 83-89.
[8]文畅平. 火灾后混凝土结构损伤的属性识别[J]. 火灾科学, 2016, 25(1): 40-46. WEN Changping. Attribute recognition of damage degree of fire-damaged concrete structure[J]. Fire Safety Science, 2016, 25(1): 40-46.
[9]刘朝峰, 苏经宇, 王威. 钢混结构地震损伤评估的突变模型[J]. 土木工程与管理学报, 2013, 30(2): 18-21. LIU Chaofeng, SU Jingyu, WANG Wei. Catastrophe model for seismic damage assessment to reinforced concrete structures[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2013, 30(2): 18-21.
[10]刘朝峰, 苏经宇, 王威, 等. 区域地震灾害承载力评价的突变模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(11): 8-15. LIU Chaofeng, SU Jingyu, WANG Wei, et al. Catastrophe model for evaluating regional earthquake -disaster-carrying capability[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2011, 21(11): 8-15.
[11]李祚泳, 张国丽, 党媛. 推广的高维突变模型势函数及用于地下水水质评价[J]. 系统工程, 2010, 28(4): 101-105. LI Zuoyong, ZHANG Guoli, DANG yuan. Generalized potential function of higher Dimension catastrophe model and its applications to evaluation of ground water quality[J]. Systems Engineering,2010,28(4):101-105.
[12]高宇剑. 高强混凝土火灾后力学性能退化及高温爆裂机理研究[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2014.
[13]李荣涛, Christopher Y. TUAN. 混凝土结构高温爆裂风险的模糊综合评价[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2015, 15(6): 6-9. LI Rongtao, Christopher Y. TUAN. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation on the spalling risk of the concrete structure at high temperatures[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2015, 15(6): 6-9.
[14]李俊华. 建筑火灾坍塌危险性的评估[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2012, 8(7): 226-228. LI Junhua. Risk assessment for collapse in building fire accident[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012, 8(7): 226-228.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家科技支撑计划项目(2015BAK14B01)
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-01-13