|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]孙思衡,谢婷,谢志利,等.基于模糊综合评估理论的磁铁类玩具风险评估方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(9):152-156.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.09.027]
　SUN Siheng,XIE Ting,XIE Zhili,et al.Research on risk assessment method of magnet toys based on fuzzy comprehen-sive evaluation theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(9):152-156.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.09.027]
点击复制

基于模糊综合评估理论的磁铁类玩具风险评估方法研究
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
12
期数:
2016年9期
页码:
152-156
栏目:
现代职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2016-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on risk assessment method of magnet toys based on fuzzy comprehen-sive evaluation theory
文章编号:
1673-193X(2016)-09-0152-05
作者:
孙思衡1; 2; 谢婷1 ; 谢志利2; 黄国忠1 ; 姜莉文1
（1.北京科技大学 土木与环境学院，北京 100083；2. 国家质量监督检验检疫总局缺陷产品管理中心，北京 100012)
Author(s):
SUN Siheng1; 2;  XIE Ting1;  XIE Zhili2;  HUANG Guozhong1;  JIANG Liwen1
(1. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;2. AQSIQ Defective Product Administrative Center, Beijing 100012, China)
关键词:
磁铁玩具; 德尔菲法; G1法; 模糊综合评估; 风险矩阵
Keywords:
magnet toys;  Delphi method;  G1 method;  fuzzy comprehensive evaluation;  risk matrix
分类号:
X913.4
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.09.027
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
磁铁类玩具存在缺陷将威胁到儿童的人身安全，甚至会造成窒息等严重伤害。在磁铁类玩具伤害案例分析的基础上，采用故障树及德尔菲法建立了窒息伤害和磁铁伤害两种伤害模式的风险评估指标体系，并利用G1法进行了指标权重计算。通过对磁铁类玩具伤害风险分析，构造了基于模糊综合评估方法的磁铁类玩具风险评估矩阵，最后通过实证分析，证明该模糊综合评估方法可应用于磁铁类玩具的风险评估。
Abstract:
The defects of magnet toys can be a threat to the safety of children, and even cause severe injuries such as choking. Firstly, based on the case analysis of injuries caused by magnet toys, the risk assessment index system of two injury modes including the choking injury and magnet injury were constructed by using the Delphi method and FTA method. Then, the G1 method was adopted to determine the index weights. By analyzing the injury risk of magnet toys, the risk assessment matrix of magnet toys was established based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Finally, through the empirical analysis, it showed that the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method can be applied to the risk assessment of magnet toys.

参考文献/References:

［1］GB 6675.2 玩具安全 第2部分：机械与物理性能［S］. 北京：中国标准出版社, 2014.
［2］Saaty T L.The analytic hierarchy process［M］. Newyork: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
［3］朱彩群. 基于层次分析法的技术创新风险评价应用研究［D］.上海：上海交通大学，2012.
［4］黄健宇. 论FMEA的分析与应用［J］. 机械工业标准化与质量, 2007(4):37-41.HUANG Jianyu. Analysis and application of FMEA ［J］, Machinery Industry Standardization & Quality, 2007(4):37-41.
［5］朱启超,匡兴华.风险矩阵方法与应用述评［J］. 中国工程科学, 2003,5(1): 89-94.ZHU Qichao, KUANG Xinghua. Risk matrix method and its application ［J］, Engineering Science, 2003,5(1): 89-94.
［6］王琰, 黄国忠, 宋存义, 等. 基于灰色理论的汽车缺陷风险评估模型［J］.北京科技大学学报，2009（9）：1178-1182.WANG Yan, HUANG Guozhong, SONG Cunyi, et al. Risk assessment model of automobile defects based on the gray theory ［J］. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2009（9）:1178-1182.
［7］赵振宇, 刘伊生, 杨华春. 故障树法引入工程项目风险管理研究［J］.现代电力，2002（2）：95-99.ZHAO Zhenyu, LIU Yisheng, YANG Huachun. Application of fault tree analyzing method to risk management of a construction project ［J］. Modern Electric Power, 2002（2）：95-99
［8］刘铁民, 张兴凯,刘功智. 安全评价方法应用指南［M］ . 北京:化学工业出版社,2005.
［9］邓苏, 张维明, 黄宏斌, 等. 决策支持系统［M］. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2009.
［10］于彭, 刘卓军, 张永光. 基于模糊理论的消费品安全风险评估方法［J］.数学的实践与认识，2014（1）：1-10.YU Peng, LIU Zhuojun, ZHANG Yongguang. Safety risk assessment method of consumer goods based on fuzzy theory ［J］,Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2014(1)：1-10.
［11］郭亚军. 综合评价理论与方法［M］ . 北京:科学出版社,2002.
［12］陈述, 余迪, 吴黎明. 基于 G1法的高危作业疲劳风险模糊综合评判［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2014(4):90-95.CHEN Shu, YU Di, WU Liming. Fatigue risk fuzzy evaluation for high-risk operations based on G1 method ［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2014(4):90-95.
［13］佟瑞鹏. 常用安全评价方法及其应用［M］. 北京：中国劳动社会保障出版社, 2010:200-205.
［14］黄坤, 刘苏, 林辉, 等. 模糊综合评价法在油库安全评价中的应用［J］. 油气储运, 2006, 25(5):54-58.HUANG Kun, LIU Su, LIN Hui, et al. Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in safety evaluation of oil depot ［J］. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2006, 25(5):54-58.
［15］叶伟, 黄天彬. 机坪安全风险的多级模糊综合评价研究［J］. 安全与环境学报, 2011, 11(3):231-235.YE Wei, HUANG Tianbin. Renovated multilevel fuzzy integrated hazards assessment system for the airport apron safety ［J］. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2011,11(3):231-235.

相似文献/References:

[1]王凯全,李亚丽,康美华,等.化工重大危险源区域风险因素的评价与控制[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(6):72.
　WANG Kai quan,LI Ya li,KANG Mei hua,et al.Regional risk factors assessment and control of chemical industry[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2009,5(9):72.
[2]蔡志勇,吕惠,周睿,等.森林航空消防风险与作战方案的综合模糊评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(7):201.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.07.029]
　CAI Zhiyong,LYU Hui,ZHOU Rui,et al.Comprehensive fuzzy assessment on risk and combat plan of forest aviation fire fighting[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(9):201.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.07.029]
[3]查国清,徐亚妮,徐文杰,等.大安全视角下高校安全教育体系评价指标和评价方法*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2023,19(8):199.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.08.029]
　ZHA Guoqing,XU Yani,XU Wenjie,et al.Evaluation indicators and methods for safety education system in colleges and universities from perspective of macro-safety[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2023,19(9):199.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.08.029]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家质量监督检验检疫总局科技计划项目（2015QK242）
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-12-08