|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]肖飞,敬加强,凌爱军,等.基于API 581的燃烧与爆炸后果分析方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(9):41-45.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.09.007]
　XIAO Fei,JING Jiaqiang,LING Aijun,et al.Research on analysis methods of combustion and explosion consequence based on API 581[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(9):41-45.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.09.007]
点击复制

基于API 581的燃烧与爆炸后果分析方法研究
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
12
期数:
2016年9期
页码:
41-45
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2016-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on analysis methods of combustion and explosion consequence based on API 581
文章编号:
1673-193X(2016)-09-0041-05
作者:
肖飞1 ; 敬加强1; 2 ; 凌爱军3 ; 赵柯4
（1. 西南石油大学 石油与天然气工程学院，四川 成都 610500；2. 油气消防四川省重点实验室，四川 成都 610500；3. 中国船级社海工审图中心，天津 300457；4. 西南油气田分公司输气管理处 合江输气作业区，四川 泸州 646200）
Author(s):
XIAO Fei1;  JING Jiaqiang1; 2;  LING Aijun3;  ZHAO Ke4
1. College of Petroleum & Natural Gas Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Sichuan 610500, China;2. Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Fire Control of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Sichuan 610500, China;3. Offshore Engineering Plan Approval Center of CCS, Tianjin 300457, China;4. PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Branch Company, Luzhou Sichuan 646200, China)
关键词:
RBI; 燃烧; 爆炸; 后果分析; API 581
Keywords:
RBI;  combustion;  explosion;  consequence analysis;  API 581
分类号:
X937
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.09.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了研究基于风险的检验（RBI）中燃烧、爆炸后果分析方法在实际应用中的效果，以API 581为基础，介绍了Level 1分析法、Level 2分析法及分析流程；然后，以油气分离器为例，根据API 581推荐的Level 1分析法编写VB程序，计算后果面积，采用PHAST软件计算Level 2分析法的后果面积；对比分析两种方法的计算结果，以及二者计算准确性的主要影响因素。研究结果表明：Level 1法比Level 2法简单，但其计算准确性较低；后果面积计算准确性的主要影响因素包括潜在泄漏质量、能量调整系数和液相后果计算面积公式选用等；应用时应兼顾两种方法的计算精度和经济效益，并选取合适的分析方法。
Abstract:
In order to study the practical application effect of analysis methods for combustion and explosion consequence in risk-based inspection (RBI), the Level 1 and Level 2 analysis methods and processes were introduced based on API 581. Taking the oil-gas separator as example, the VB program was compiled to calculate the consequence areas according to the Level 1 analysis method recommended by API 581, and the consequence areas of Level 2 analysis method were calculated by using PHAST software. The comparison analysis was conducted on the calculation results and the main influencing factors of accuracy for two methods. The results showed that the Level 1 method is simpler than Level 2 method, but its calculation accuracy is lower. The main influencing factors of calculation accuracy on consequence area include the potential leakage quality, the energy adjustment coefficient and the selection of calculation formula for liquid consequence area. The calculation accuracy and economic benefit of two methods should be taken into account in application, and the appropriate analysis method should be selected.

参考文献/References:

［1］ 李毅, 詹燕民, 轩军厂, 等. 基于RBI技术的海上平台延期服役静设备定量化安全评估技术［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2013, 9(10): 121-126.LI Yi, ZHAN Yanmin, XUAN Junchang, et al. Exploration and application of RBI-based quantitative safety assessment technology for static equipment in extended service on offshore platform ［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2013, 9(10): 121-126.
［2］ 陈庆娟, 王三明. RBI技术在我国企业的应用研究与改进思考［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2012, 8(6): 191-196.CHEN Qingjuan, WANG Sanming. Research and improvement on the application of RBI technology in Chinese enterprise ［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012, 8(6): 191-196.
［3］ 承压设备系统基于风险的检验实施导则 第5部分：失效后果定量分析方法，GB 26610.5-2014［S］.2014
［4］ Risk based Inspection Technology，API 581-2008. ［S］. 2008.
［5］ 章湘武, 梁国华. 风险检验技术(RBI)在茂名石化的应用［J］. 中外能源, 2010(15): 82-87.ZHANG Xiangwu, LIANG Guohua. The application of RBI in SINOPEC Maoming company ［J］. Sino-global Energy, 2010(15): 82-87.
［6］ 陈学东, 艾志斌, 杨铁成, 等. 基于风险的检测（RBI）中以剩余寿命为基础的失效概率评价方法［J］. 压力容器, 2006, 23(5): 1-5.CHEN Xuedong, AI Zhibin, YANG Tiecheng, et al. Assessment method of failure probability with residual life as reference in risk-based inspection (RBI) ［J］.Pressure Vessel Technology, 2006, 23(5): 1-5.
［7］ 石超, 张圣柱, 罗艾民, 等. 基于可靠度理论的RBI修正模型研究［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2010, 6(5): 77-81.SHI Chao, ZHANG Shengzhu, LUO Aimin, et al. Research on the risk assessment method of risk-based inspection technology based on the reliability theory ［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2010, 6(5): 77-81.
［8］ 黄亮亮, 姚安林, 杨鲁明, 等. 基于T-S模糊故障树的输气站场设备失效可能性研究［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2014, 10(8): 144-149.HUANG Liangliang, YAO Anlin, YANG Luming, et al. Study on failure possibility of facilities in gas transmission station based on T-S fuzzy FTA ［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2014, 10(8): 144-149.
［9］周德红, 冯豪, 李文, 等. 火灾爆炸后果分析法在LNG储罐风险评估中的应用［J］. 工业安全与环保, 2015, 41(10): 54-56.ZHOU Dehong, FENG Hao, LI Wen, et al. Application of fire and explosion effect analysis method in risk assessment for LNG storage tank ［J］. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2015, 41(10): 54-56.
［10］张玉平, 陶彬, 郎需庆. 大型液化石油气储罐失效后果模拟［A］. 中国职业安全健康协会2011年学术年会论文集［C］. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 2011：368-372.
［11］黄小美, 李百战, 彭世尼, 等. 基于事件树的天然气管道风险定量分析［J］. 煤气与热力, 2009, 29(4): B42-B46.HUANG Xiaomei, LI Baizhan, PENG Shini, et al. Quantitative risk analysis of natural gas pipeline based on event tree ［J］. Gas & Heat, 2009, 29(4): B42-B46.
［12］朱伯龄, 於孝春. PHAST软件对液化天然气泄漏扩散的研究［J］. 计算机与应用化学, 2009, 26(11)： 1418-1422.
［13］杜建华, 扈洁琼. 定量风险分析在炼油装置中的应用［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2013, 9(3): 157-160.DU Jianhua, HU Jieqiong. Application of QRA in refinery plant ［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2013, 9(3): 157-160.ZHU Boling, YU Xiaochun. Research for PHAST in the process of liquefied natural gas discharge and dispersion ［J］. Computers and Applied Chemistry, 2009, 26(11)：1418-1422.
［14］谷志宇, 帅健, 董绍华. 应用API581对输气站场进行定量风险评价［J］. 天然气工业, 2006, 26(5): 111-114.GU Zhiyu, SHUAI Jian, DONG Shaohua. Quantitative risk assessment on gas transmission station with API 581 ［J］. Natural Gas Industry, 2006, 26(5): 111-114.
［15］马萌. 海洋平台立管RBI技术应用研究［D］. 兰州: 兰州理工大学, 2013.

相似文献/References:

[1]王磊,陈东琼,李绪丰,等.基于RBI的碳五石油树脂装置风险评估分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(6):112.
　WANG Lei,CHEN Dong-qiong,LI Xu-feng,et al.Risk Assessment on C_5 Petroleum Resin Plant Based on RBI Technology[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(9):112.
[2]张宝亮,丁〓珏,王庆涛,等.约束空间可燃气体燃烧爆轰特性的数值研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(8):23.
　ZHANG Bao liang,DING Jue,WANG Qing tao,et al.Numerical study on the combustion and detonation characteristics  of combustible gas in constraint space[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(9):23.
[3]郑明,姚安林,叶冲,等.基于RBI的输气站场分离器风险评估方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(6):120.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.06.023]
　ZHENG Ming,YAO An lin,YE Chong,et al.Study on risk assessment method of separator in gas station based on RBI[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(9):120.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.06.023]
[4]黄亮亮,姚安林,魏沁汝,等.基于RBI与多米诺效应的输气站场设备定量风险评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(5):90.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.05.015]
　HUANG Liangliang,YAO Anlin,WEI Qingru,et al.Quantitative risk assessment of facilities in gas transmission station based on RBI and domino effect[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(9):90.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.05.015]
[5]王振华,罗文龙,郝军,等.化工装置风险排序及其应用*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(3):105.
　WANG Zhen hua,LUO Wen long,HAO Jun,et al.Risk ranking of petroleumchemistry installations and its applications[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2009,5(9):105.
[6]刘全,张东胜,程思闻,等.基于动态信息技术的设备主动维护预知平台的设计[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(7):99.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.07.018]
　LIU Quan,ZHANG Dong-sheng,CHENG Si-wen,et al.Design of predictive and proactive maintenance platform for equipments based on dynamic information technology[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(9):99.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.07.018]
[7]姚安林,黄亮亮,蒋宏业,等.输油气站场综合风险评价技术研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(1):138.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.01.023]
　YAO An-lin,HUANG Liang-liang,JIANG Hong-ye,et al.Research on comprehensive risk assessment technique of oil & gas transmission station[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(9):138.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.01.023]
[8]马欣,付晓君,余景刚,等.RBI技术应用于LNG设备上的改进研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(4):107.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2015.04.017]
　MA Xin,FU Xiao-jun,YU Jing-gang,et al.Study on improvement for application of RBI technology in LNG equipment[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(9):107.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2015.04.017]
[9]刘琼,杜沄燕,陈立林.书架群燃烧相互影响下的书架防火间距优化研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(10):52.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.10.008]
　LIU Qiong,DU Yunyan,CHEN Lilin.Research on optimization of fire protection spacing for bookshelf under mutual influence of bookshelf group combustion[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(9):52.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.10.008]
[10]李丹丹,李敏,刘松林,等.湍流模型和壁面函数对有障碍半开口空间氢气燃烧模拟的影响[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(10):59.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.10.009]
　LI Dandan,LI Min,LIU Songlin,et al.Influence of turbulence model and wall function on the simulation of hydrogen combustion in a semiconfined space with obstacle[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(9):59.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.10.009]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2016-07-18
作者简介：肖飞，硕士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-12-08