[1]周勇勇,李夕兵,刘志祥,等.高精度三维地下微震台网模糊优选方法[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(7):82-86.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.07.015]
ZHOU Yongyong,LI Xibing,LIU Zhixiang,et al.Fuzzy optimum approach for three-dimensional underground
micro-seismic network with high precision[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(7):82-86.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.07.015]
点击复制
高精度三维地下微震台网模糊优选方法
ZHOU Yongyong,LI Xibing,LIU Zhixiang,et al.Fuzzy optimum approach for three-dimensional underground micro-seismic network with high precision[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(7):82-86.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.07.015]
《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]
- 卷:
- 12
- 期数:
- 2016年7期
- 页码:
- 82-86
- 栏目:
- 现代职业安全卫生管理与技术
- 出版日期:
- 2016-07-30
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Fuzzy optimum approach for three-dimensional underground micro-seismic network with high precision
- Keywords:
- micro-seismic network; entropy weight method; objective weight; fuzzy mathematics; fuzzy comprehensive optimization
- 分类号:
- X936
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 针对贵州开阳磷矿东翼矿区井下微震监测系统台网布置方案的优选问题，基于国 内外学者在台网优化布置时所选参数指标，对微震监测台网在建设、运行和维护阶段的 需求进行分析，确定多个台网布置方案的静态、动态和定量、非定量指标构建综合评价 指标体系。通过熵权法给出各评价指标的客观权重向量，基于模糊数学原理建立模糊综 合评判模型，对初选出的五个台网布置方案进行分析，求解出各方案的综合优越度，最 终确定并推荐方案二（综合优越度为0.796）为最优方案。模糊综合评价模型能够较准 确地确定适用于矿山需求的微震监测台网方案，对矿山微震监测系统的建设具有指导意 义。
- Abstract:
- In the process of ascertaining the optimal layout scheme for the underground micro-seismic monitoring system network in the east flank mining area of Kaiyang Phosphorite Mine in Guizhou, based on the parameters indexes chosen by domestic and foreign scholars during the optimizing of network layouts, the requirements in the construction, operation and maintenance stage of the micro-seismic monitoring network were analyzed, and a comprehensive evaluation index system was established by determining the static and dynamic, quantitative and non-quantitative indexes of multiple network layout schemes. The objective weight vectors of each evaluation index were determined by entropy weight method, and a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model was built based on the fuzzy mathematics principle. After the analysis on five primary network layout schemes, the comprehensive superiority degrees of each scheme were obtained, and the scheme Ⅱ with the comprehensive superiority degree of 0.796 was determined and recommended to be the optimal scheme. The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model can determine the micro-seismic monitoring network scheme meeting the requirements of mine more accurately, and it is an important guidance for the construction of the micro-seismic monitoring system in mine.
参考文献/References:
［1］张楚旋, 李夕兵, 董陇军,等. 三函数四指标矿震信号S波到时拾取方法及应用［J
］. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015(8)：1650-1659.
ZHANG Chuxuan, LI Xibing, DONG Longjun, et al. A S-wave phase picking method
with four indicators of three functions for microseismic signal in mines［J
］. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015(8)： 1650-1659.
［2］Duan D, Tang C A, Feng X J. Microseismic Monitoring System
Establishment and its Application to Xinzhangzi Coal Mine［J］. Advanced
Materials Research, 2011, 396-398:99-102.
［3］Li B, Dai F, Xu N W, et al. Establishment and Application of
Microseismic Monitoring System to Deep-Buried Underground Powerhouse［J］.
Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 838-841(838-841):889-893.
［4］张飞, 刘德峰, 张衡,等. 基于IMS微震监测系统的微震事件定位精度分析［J］.
中国安全生产科学技术, 2013, 9(6):21-26.
ZHANG Fei, LIU Defeng, ZHANG Heng, et al. Location accuracy analysis of the
seismic events based on the IMS microseismic monitoring system［J］. Journal
of Safety Science and Technology, 2013, 9(6):21-26.
［5］唐礼忠, 张君, 李夕兵,等. 基于定量地震学的矿山微震活动对开采速率的响应特
性研究［J］. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(7):1349-1354.
TANG Lizhong, ZHANG Jun, LI Xibing, et al. Research on response of mine
microseismicity to mining rate based on quantitative seismology［J］.
Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(7):1349-1354.
［6］Gibowicz S J, Kijko A. An Introduction to Mining Seismology ［M］.
Academic Press, 1994
［7］Dong L J, Xi Bing L I, Zhou Z L, et al. Three-dimensional analytical
solution of acoustic emission source location for cuboid monitoring network
without pre-measured wave velocity［J］. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals
Society of China (English Edition), 2015, 25(1):293-302.
［8］Kijko A. An algorithm for the optimum distribution of a regional
seismic network—I［J］. pure and applied geophysics, 1977, 115(4): 999-
1009.
［9］Kijko A. An algorithm for the optimum distribution of a regional
seismic network-II: an analysis of the accuracy of location of local
earthquakes depending on the number of seismic stations. Pure appl Geophys［
J］. Pure & Applied Geophysics, 1977, 115(4):1011-1021.
［10］MENDECKI A J. Seismic monitoring in mines［M］. London：Chapman and
Hall Press，1997：100-107.
［11］牟宗龙, 窦林名, 巩思园,等. 矿井SOS微震监测网络优化设计及震源定位误差数
值分析［J］. 煤矿开采, 2009, 14(3):8-12.
MU Zonglong, DOU Linming, GONG Siyuan, et al. Networking design of SOS
micro-seismic monitoring for mine and error analysis of seismic resource
orientation ［J］. Coalmining Technology , 2009, 14(3):8-12.
［12］高永涛, 吴庆良, 吴顺川, 等. 基于 D 值理论的微震监测台网优化布设［J］.
北京科技大学学报, 2013, 35（12）：1538-1545.
GAO Yongtao, WU Qingliang, WU Shunchuan, et al. Optimization of microseismic
monitoring networks based on the theory of D-optimal design［J］. Journal of
University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2013, 35（12）：1538-1545
［13］徐奴文. 高陡岩质边坡微震监测与稳定性分析研究［D］. 大连：大连理工大学,
2011.
［14］Shannon C E, Shannon C E. The Mathematical Theory of Communications, I
and II［J］. Bell System Technical Journal, 1948, 27.
［15］Yang H J, Han W, Zeng T, et al. Failure Risk Assessment of the Power
System Transmission Line Based on an Improved Entropy Method［C］//Applied
Mechanics and Materials. 2013, 333: 1514-1517.
［16］卢丹丹, 宋文华, 张桂钏,等. 基于AHP-熵权法的石化企业承灾体脆弱性评估［J
］. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2015，11(12)：180-185.
LU Dandan, SONG Wenhua, ZHANG Guichuan, et al. Evaluation on vulnerability
of hazard bearing body in petrochemical enterprises based on AHP - entropy
weight method［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2015，11(12)：
180-185
［17］Li F, Wang W, Shi Y, et al. Fuzzy synthetic evaluation model based on
the knowledge system［J］. International Journal of Innovative Computing,
Information and Control, 2013, 9(10): 4073-4084.
［18］Jinting Y, Jingxiao S, Yinghui L. Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of
atmospheric environment quality based on entropy weight［C］//Business
Management and Electronic Information (BMEI), 2011 International Conference
on. IEEE, 2011, 4: 363-366.
相似文献/References:
[1]申玉琪,赵东风,刘义,等.精神熵分析法的提出及应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(10):166.
SHENG Yu-qi,ZHAO Dong-feng,LIU Yi,et al.Proposition of psyche entropy analysis and its application[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(7):166.
[2]单仁亮,赵鑫,徐加夫,等.基于加权灰靶模型的区域铁矿安全生产能力评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(10):27.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.10.005]
SHAN Ren liang,ZHAO Xin,XU Jia fu,et al.Safe production capacity evaluation of regional Iron mines based on weighted grey target model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(7):27.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.10.005]
[3]撒占友,刘凯利,马池香,等.民营企业安全文化模型及其实证分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(8):178.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.030]
SA Zhanyou,LIU Kaili,MA Chixiang,et al.Safety culture model of private enterprises and its empirical analysis[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(7):178.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.030]
[4]黄建文,王东,廖再毅,等.基于组合赋权法和云理论的震后重建住宅工程质量评价研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(3):127.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.03.023]
HUANG Jianwen,WANG Dong,LIAO Zaiyi,et al.Evaluation on engineering quality of post-earthquake reconstruction
residential buildings based on combined weight method and cloud theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(7):127.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.03.023]
[5]辛督强.基于熵权-TOPSIS的陕西省各市区道路交通安全评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(10):116.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.10.020]
XIN Du-qiang.Evaluation on road traffic safety of the cities in Shaanxi province based on entropy-TOPSIS method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(7):116.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.10.020]
[6]章国宝,万林,黄永明.基于云模型的电梯运行可靠性模糊综合评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(4):175.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.04.032]
ZHANG Guobao,WAN Lin,HUANG Yongming.Fuzzy comprehensive assessment of elevator operation
reliability based on cloud model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(7):175.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.04.032]
[7]何亚伯,汪洋,李祎琛,等.基于改进DEA交叉效率模型的洪水灾害区域脆弱性评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(5):86.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.05.015]
HE Yabo,WANG Yang,LI Yichen,et al.Evaluation on regional vulnerability of flood disaster based
on improved DEA overlapping efficiency model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(7):86.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.05.015]
[8]赵挺生,任玲玲,周炜,等.基于熵权法-CIM模型的高速公路施工临近房屋安全风险评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(3):174.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.03.028]
ZHAO Tingsheng,REN Lingling,ZHOU Wei,et al.Safety risk assessment on buildings adjacent to construction site of expressway based on entropy-weight method and CIM model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(7):174.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.03.028]
[9]刘兵,李晓璐,张彭,等.基于熵权可拓物元模型的城市轨道交通线路运营风险评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(12):175.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.12.028]
LIU Bing,LI Xiaolu,ZHANG Peng,et al.Evaluationon operational risk of urban rail transit line based on entropy weight extension matterelement model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(7):175.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.12.028]
[10]刘晓东,冯旭宇,刘旭洋,等.内蒙古雷击人员伤亡特征及其致灾因素的熵权分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(4):182.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.04.029]
LIU Xiaodong,FENG Xuyu,LIU Xuyang,et al.Characteristics of lightning casualties in Inner Mongolia and entropy weight analysis of disaster causing factors[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(7):182.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.04.029]
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
- 国家自然科学基金项目（41272304）
