[1]李海燕,吴国斌,王兆云.组织间目标差异对应急合作关系的影响
——信息分享行为的中介作用及任务不确定性的调节效应[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(5):54-59.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.05.010]
LI Haiyan,WU Guobin,WANG Zhaoyun.Impact of goal incongruence among organizations on emergency partnership：
mediation function of information sharing action and moderating effect of task uncertainty[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(5):54-59.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.05.010]
点击复制
组织间目标差异对应急合作关系的影响
——信息分享行为的中介作用及任务不确定性的调节效应
LI Haiyan,WU Guobin,WANG Zhaoyun.Impact of goal incongruence among organizations on emergency partnership： mediation function of information sharing action and moderating effect of task uncertainty[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(5):54-59.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.05.010]
《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]
- 卷:
- 12
- 期数:
- 2016年5期
- 页码:
- 54-59
- 栏目:
- 学术论著
- 出版日期:
- 2016-05-30
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Impact of goal incongruence among organizations on emergency partnership： mediation function of information sharing action and moderating effect of task uncertainty
- Keywords:
- goal incongruence among organizations; emergency partnership; information sharing action; task uncertainty
- 分类号:
- X92
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 合作关系质量的高低直接影响应急活动的成败，如何改善合作关系，从而提高协同绩效是应急管理领域亟待解决的问题。探讨组织间目标差异对应急合作关系的影响，并重点分析信息分享行为和任务不确定性在以上关系中所起的中介作用及调节效应。通过对239位基层应急指挥人员的问卷调查数据进行层级回归分析发现：组织间目标差异对应急合作关系有显著的负向影响；信息分享行为在二者之间起到部分中介作用；任务不确定性对组织间目标差异与社会确认之间的关系没有显著影响，但对组织间目标差异与目标确认之间的关系存在显著的负向影响。结论表明，高层应急指挥人员可采用信息公告牌、制定信息沟通内容结构框架的措施来约束社会确认信息的传递。
- Abstract:
- The quality of partnership directly impacts the success or failure of emergency activities. It is urgent to solve the problem of how to improve the partnership, so as to improve the cooperation performance in the emergency management field. The impact of goal incongruence among organizations on emergency partnership was discussed, and the mediation function and moderating effect of information sharing action and task uncertainty in the above relationship were emphasized. Through hierarchical regression analysis on questionnaire survey data from 239 grass-roots emergency commanders, it showed that the goal incongruence among organizations has an obvious negative impact on emergency partnership. the information sharing action plays a partial mediation function between them, while the task uncertainty has no significant influence on the relationship between goal incongruence among organizations and social confirmation, but plays a significant negative influence on the relationship between goal incongruence among organizations and goal confirmation. The results showed that high-level emergency commanders may adopt the measures such as information billboards and formulating structure framework of information communicative contents to constrain the transmission of social confirmation information.
参考文献/References:
［1］Alexander E R. How organizations act together: Interorganizational coordination in theory and practice［M］. Psychology Press, 1995.
［2］McEntire D A. Coordinating multi-organisational responses to disaster: lessons from the March 28, 2000, Fort Worth tornado［J］. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 2002, 11(5): 369-379.
［3］Drabek T E, McEntire D A. Emergent phenomena and the sociology of disaster: lessons, trends and opportunities from the research literature［J］. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 2003, 12(2): 97-112.
［4］Devitt K R, Borodzicz E P. Interwoven Leadership: the Missing Link in Multi-Agency Major Incident Response［J］. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 2008, 16(4): 208-216.
［5］汪业凤. 突发事件应急决策过程中群体冲突协调机制研究［D］. 长沙：中南大学, 2012.
［6］Bharosa N, Lee J K, Janssen M. Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: Propositions from field exercises ［J］. Information Systems Frontiers, 2010, 12(1): 49-65.
［7］Kelly J R, Loving T J. Time pressure and group performance: Exploring underlying processes in the attentional focus model［J］. Journal of experimental social psychology, 2004, 40(2): 185-198.
［8］Neubaum G, R?sner L, Rosenthal-von der Pütten A M, et al. Psychosocial functions of social media usage in a disaster situation: A multi-methodological approach［J］. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 34: 28-38.
［9］Auf der Heide E. Disaster response: principles of preparation and coordination［M］//Disaster response: Principles of preparation and coordination. Canadá. CV Mosby Company, 1989.
［10］Jehn K A, Northcraft G B, Neale M A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups［J］. Administrative science quarterly, 1999, 44(4): 741-763.
［11］Wenger D E. Emergent and volunteer behavior during disaster: research findings and planning implications［M］. Texas A & M University. Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center, 1992.
［12］Astley W G, Van de Ven A H. Central perspectives and debates in organization theory［J］. Administrative science quarterly, 1983: 245-273.
［13］Hinsz V B, Nickell G S. Positive Reactions to Working in Groups in a Study of Group and Individual Goal Decision Making［J］. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2004, 8(4): 253.
［14］Majchrzak A, Jarvenpaa S L, Hollingshead A B. Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters［J］. Organization Science, 2007, 18(1): 147-161.
［15］Quarantelli E L, Taylor V A. Delivery of Emergency Medical Services in Disaster［J］. 1977.
［16］Laing D, Weir C M. Governance structures, size and corporate performance in UK firms［J］. Management Decision, 1999, 37(5): 457-464.
［17］Paton D, Flin R. Disaster stress: an emergency management perspective［J］. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 1999, 8(4): 261-267.
［18］O'Reilly C A. Variations in decision makers' use of information sources: The impact of quality and accessibility of information［J］. Academy of Management Journal, 1982, 25(4): 756-771.
［19］Burleson B R, Levine B J, Samter W. Decision-making procedure and decision quality［J］. Human Communication Research, 1984, 10(4): 557-574.
［20］Jap S D. Pie-expansion efforts: collaboration processes in buyer-supplier relationships［J］. Journal of marketing Research, 1999: 461-475.
［21］Jap S D. Perspectives on joint competitive advantages in buyer-supplier relationships［J］. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2001, 18(1): 19-35.
［22］Nolte I M, Boenigk S. Public-nonprofit partnership performance in a disaster context: The case of Haiti［J］. Public administration, 2011, 89(4): 1385-1402.
［23］Perrow C. A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations［J］. American sociological review, 1967: 194-208.
相似文献/References:
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
- 国家自然科学基金项目（71273203）；教育部人文社会科学基金项目（12YJC630231）
