|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]汪伟忠,张国宝,卢明银.多因素耦合的加工车间关键风险因素定量分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(9):158-164.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.09.025]
　WANG Wei-zhong,ZHANG Guo-bao,LU Ming-yin.Quantitative analysis on critical risk factors of processing workshop based on multiple-factor coupling[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(9):158-164.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.09.025]
点击复制

多因素耦合的加工车间关键风险因素定量分析
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
11
期数:
2015年9期
页码:
158-164
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2015-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Quantitative analysis on critical risk factors of processing workshop based on multiple-factor coupling
作者:
汪伟忠1; 张国宝1; 卢明银2
(1.安徽科技学院 管理学院, 安徽 滁州 233100；2.中国矿业大学 矿业学院, 江苏 徐州 221100)
Author(s):
WANG Wei-zhong1;  ZHANG Guo-bao1;  LU Ming-yin2
(1.School of Management, Anhui Science and Technology University, Chuzhou Anhui 233100, China; 2.School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou Jiangsu 221116, China)
关键词:
耦合风险; 加工车间; 模糊理论; DEMATEL; 安全
Keywords:
coupling risk;  processing workshop;  fuzzy theory;  DEMATEL;  safety
分类号:
X913.4;TU714
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.09.025
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了准确分析加工车间关键风险因素，考虑多风险因子交互影响的情境，提出了一种基于模糊决策实验室分析法的加工车间关键风险因素定量分析方法。首先，从人员、设备、环境、物料和管理因素等5个维度辨识加工车间风险因素并建立风险因素集；基于此，采用三角模糊数对专家判断语义进行表征，然后运用DEMATEL法计算多因素耦合下的风险重要度，从而确定加工车间的关键风险因素。最后，以安徽省某机械加工车间为例，说明所提出方法的应用过程。结果表明，加强对安全制度和安全文化建设等关键风险因素的控制，有助于加工车间的风险控制，改善车间生产安全。
Abstract:
a) Abstract: In order to analyze the critical risk factors of processing workshop accurately, considering the scenario of interaction between multiple risk factors, a quantitative analysis method on critical risk factors of processing workshop based on fuzzy DEMATEL method was put forward. Firstly, the risk factors of processing workshop were identified from five dimensions including human, equipment, environment, material and management factors, and the risk factors set was constructed. On this basis, the expert judgment semantics were represented by triangular fuzzy number, and the DEMATEL method was applied to calculate the risk importance under multiple factors coupling, thus the key risk factors of processing workshop were determined. Finally, an example of a certain mechanical processing workshop in Anhui was given to illustrate the application process of the method. The result showed that strengthening the control on safety regulations, safety culture construction and other key risk factors is helpful to control risk and improve the work safety of processing workshop.

参考文献/References:

［1］汪伟忠,卢明银,周波,等.基于集对分析的车间安全管理能力评价［J］.安全与环境学报,2013,13(3):252-254 WANG Wei-zhong, LU Ming-yin, ZHOU Bo, et al. Assessment for the workshop safety management based on the set pair analysis ［J］.Journal of Safety and Environment, 2013, 13(3):252-254
［2］安全管理网.事故案例分析［EB/OL］.
［2015］.http://www.safehoo.com/Case/Case/Machine.
［3］Liou J.H., Tzeng, G.H., Chang, H.C. Airline safety measurement using a hybrid model ［J］. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2007,13(4):243-249
［4］Mentes.A, Akyildiz.H,Yetkin.M, et al. A FSA based fuzzy DEMATEL approach for risk assessment of cargo ships at coasts and open seas of Turkey［J］. Safety Science,2015,79(5):1-10
［5］林嘉豪,李克武,张兵.基于风险耦合理论的航空装备本质安全管理研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(9):75-79 LIN Jia-hao, LI Ke-wu , ZHANG Bin. Inherent safety management of aviation equipment based on risk coupling theory［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2011,7(9):75-79
［6］刘全龙,李新春,王雷.煤矿事故风险因子耦合作用分析及度量研究［J］.统计与信息论坛,2015,30(3):82-87 LIU Quan-long, LI Xin-chun, WANG Lei. Analysis and Measurement of risk factors coupling in coal mine accidents［J］.Statistics & Information Fourum, 2015,30(3):82-87
［7］刘东亮,徐浩军,张久星.多因素耦合复杂飞行情形风险定量评估方法［J］.航空学报,2012,34(3):509-516 LIU Dong-liang,XU Hao-jun,ZHANG Jiu-xing. Quantitative risk evaluation methods for multi-factor coupling complex flight situations［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica sinica, 2012,34(3):509-516
［8］胡甚平,黎法明,席永涛,等.海上交通系统风险成因耦合机理仿真［J］.应用基础与工程科学学报,2015,23(2):409-419 HU Shen-ping, LI Fa-ming XI Yong-tao, et al. Novel simulation on coupling mechanism of risk formation segments for marine traffic system［J］. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2015, 23(2): 409-419
［9］Qureshi Z H. A Review of Accident Modeling Approaches for Complex Socio-Technical System ［A］.Proceedings of the twelfth Australian workshop on Safety critical systems and software and safety-related programmable systems［C］. 2007
［10］张进春, 吴超,侯锦秀,等. 生产车间安全管理状况的区间数模糊综合评价方法研究［J］.安全与环境学报,2006,6(2):135-138 ZHANG Jin-chun, WU Chao, HOU Jin-xiu, et al. Study on the fuzzy integrate evaluating method of interval number on the workshop safety management ［J］. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2006,6(2):135-138
［11］韩刚.石化企业安全生产模糊综合评价系统的研究［J］.消防科学与技术,2009,28(5):384-386 HAN Gang. Research on fuzzy synthetic evaluation system of production security in petrochemical enterprise［J］. Fire Science and Technology, 2009,28(5):384-386
［12］Chen C T. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment ［J］. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2000,114(1):1-9
［13］张锐，王红君，张燚，等.城市品牌建设影响因素语言评价信息识别方法［J］.中国矿业大学学报,2014,43(2):325-332 ZHANG Rui, WANG Hong-jun, ZHANG Yan, et al. Recognition approach of affecting factors of urban branding based on language assessment information［J］.Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2014,43(2):325-332

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
安徽省教育厅人文社科重大项目(SK2014ZD022);安徽科技学院人才引进项目(SRC2014400)
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-09-30