|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]施志坚,王华伟,徐璇.基于CREAM和贝叶斯网络的航空维修人为差错概率预测[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(4):185-191.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2015.04.030]
 SHI Zhi-jian,WANG Hua-wei,XU Xuan.Prediction of human error probability in aviation maintenance based on CREAM and Bayesian network[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(4):185-191.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2015.04.030]
点击复制

基于CREAM和贝叶斯网络的航空维修人为差错概率预测
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
11
期数:
2015年4期
页码:
185-191
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2015-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Prediction of human error probability in aviation maintenance based on CREAM and Bayesian network
作者:
施志坚王华伟徐璇
南京航空航天大学 民航学院,江苏 南京211106)
Author(s):
SHI Zhi-jian WANG Hua-wei XU Xuan
(College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing Jiangsu 211106, China)
关键词:
航空维修差错CREAM贝叶斯网络共同绩效条件失效概率
Keywords:
aviation maintenance error CREAM Bayesian network CPC failure probability
分类号:
X949
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2015.04.030
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
航空维修差错不仅严重威胁着飞行安全,同时也会增加航空公司的维修成本。针对航空维修人员发生差错成因的复杂性以及历史事故数据缺乏的情况下,将人因可靠性与失误分析方法(CREAM)和贝叶斯网络(BN)相结合,提出一种改进的维修差错分析模型。根据维修任务构建相应的贝叶斯网络模型,为各子节点设置条件概率表(CPT);基于维修基地的实际维修环境,对行为形成因子(PSFs)进行评估,得到共同绩效条件(CPCs)的水平;利用各CPC因子下各个行为功能失效模式的权重因子,对各认知活动进行失效概率的修正;将修正概率作为贝叶斯网络根节点的输入,利用推理机制,得到差错发生概率。通过案例分析和计算,验证了所述方法的可行性和有效性。
Abstract:
Aviation maintenance errors could not only threaten fight safety, but also increase the maintenance cost of airlines. Due to the complexity in causes of human error by aviation maintenance personnel and the lack of enough historical accident data, an improved model on error analysis of aviation maintenance was proposed based on cognitive reliability and error analysis method(CREAM) and Bayesian network. Firstly, according to maintenance tasks, the Bayesian network model of maintenance error was constructed, and the conditional probabilities table(CPT) of each child node was determined. Secondly, based on the practical maintenance environment of certain maintenance base, the performance shaping factors(PSFs) were assessed, and the levels of common performance conditions(CPCs) were obtained. Then, the weighting factors of each behavioral function failure mode under each CPC factor were used to revise the failure probabilities of cognitive activities. Finally, the revised probabilities were regarded as the input of root node in Bayesian network, and the maintenance error probability was calculated by using reasoning mechanism. The feasibility and effectiveness of the method were validated by the case study.

参考文献/References:

[1]李涛,蒋英杰,孙志强,等.航空维修差错模式及差错成因的灰色关联分析[J].中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(2): 85-89 LI Tao, JIANG Ying-jie, SUN Zhi-qiang, et al. Analysis of relationships between aviation maintenance error modes and their causes based on grey relational analysis method[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2011, 21(2): 85-89
[2]张晓全,王欢,燕春光.基于DEMATEL-ANP法的航空维修人为因素分析[J].安全与环境工程, 2014, 21(1): 128-133 ZHANG Xiao-quan,WANG Han,YAN Chun-guang.Analysis on human factors in aviation maintenance based on DEMATEL and ANP[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2014, 21(1): 128-133
[3]Wang T C, Chuang L H. Psychological and physiological fatigue variation and fatigue factors in aircraft line maintenance crews[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2014, 44(1): 107-113
[4]Liang G F, Lin J T, Hwang S L, et al. Preventing human errors in aviation maintenance using an on-line maintenance assistance platform[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2010, 40(3): 356-367
[5]张晓全,王欢.基于熵权-HDT的航空器维修人误概率确定[J].中国安全科学学报, 2012, 22(1): 100-105 ZHANG Xiao-quan,WANG Han, Wang H. Determination of human error probability in aircraft maintenance based on entropy weight and HDT[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2012, 22(1): 100-105
[6]张晓全,王欢.基于AHP-SLIM的航空器维修人误概率确定[J].中国安全生产科学技术, 2012, 8(8): 111-115 ZHANG Xiao-quan,WANG Han. Determination of human error probability in aircraft maintenance based on AHP and SLIM[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012, 8(8): 111-115
[7]魏麟,周长春,谢果.一种基于贝叶斯网络的机务维修差错调查模型算法[J].中国安全生产科学技术, 2012, 8(8): 102-105 WEI Lin, ZHOU Chang-chun, XIE Guo. A model algorithm of aviation maintenance error survey based on Bayesian network[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012, 8(8): 102-105.
[8]金灿灿,左洪福,潘绍松.基于Bayes估计的民航维修人为差错评估技术研究[J].科学技术与工程, 2012, 20(22): 5689-5692 JIN Chan-chan, ZUO Hong-fu, PAN Shao-song. Research of civil aviation maintenance human error assessment technology Based on Bayes estimation[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2012, 20(22): 5689-5692
[9]王永刚,单方方,王灿敏. CREAM法在机务维修操作差错概率预测中的应用[J].安全与环境工程, 2014, 21(1): 134-137 WANG Yong-gang, SHAN Fang-fang, WANG Can-min. Application of CREAM method in aviation maintenance error probability prediction[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2014, 21(1): 134-137
[10]Hollnagel E. Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method[M].Oxford ( UK) : Elsevier Science Ltd,1998
[11]高扬,宫一民.飞行机组人为差错风险分析方法研究[J].工业工程, 2014, (17): 1-6 GAO Yang, GONG Yi-min. Modeling and analysis of risk of flight crew error[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2014, (17): 1-6
[12]孙瑞山,张思远.人的可靠性综合分析模式及应用[J].工业工程, 2014, (17): 49-54 SUN Rui-shan, ZHANG Si-yuan.Research and application of integrated human reliability analysis mode[J].Industrial Engineering Journal, 2014, (17): 49-54
[13]王永刚,孙瑶.基于BN的FTA在通用航空风险评价中的应用[J].中国安全科学学报, 2011, 20(3): 19-23 WANG Yong-gang, SUN Yao. Application of FTA Based on BN to Risk Assessment of General Aviation[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2011, 20(3): 19-23
[14]文传强.基于人因工程的机务保障研究[D]. 武汉:武汉理工大学, 201

相似文献/References:

[1]陈洁,陈国明,李新宏.基于BN-CREAM的深水井控压井作业风险诱因研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(10):86.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.10.014]
 CHEN Jie,CHEN Guoming,LI Xinhong(.Research on risk factors of well killing operation in deep-water well control based on BN-CREAM[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(4):86.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.10.014]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金资助(71401073); 中国民航局联合基金项目(U1233115)
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-04-30