|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]廖国礼,王胜强,王鹰鹏,等.矿山企业从业人员安全态度调查设计与分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(12):178-184.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.12.030]
　LIAO Guo-li,WANG Sheng-qiang,WANG Ying-peng,et al.Survey design and analysis on safety attitude of mine enterprise employees[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(12):178-184.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.12.030]
点击复制

矿山企业从业人员安全态度调查设计与分析
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
10
期数:
2014年12期
页码:
178-184
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2014-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Survey design and analysis on safety attitude of mine enterprise employees
作者:
廖国礼1; 王胜强2; 王鹰鹏2; 赵海啸1
(1.中国安全生产科学研究院 矿山安全技术研究所，北京100029; 2.铜陵有色金属集团股份有限公司 冬瓜山铜矿，安徽 铜陵244000)
Author(s):
LIAO Guo-li1;  WANG Sheng-qiang2;  WANG Ying-peng2;  ZHAO Hai-xiao1
(1. Mine Safety Technology Institute, China Academy of Safety Science & Technology, Beijing 100029, China; 2. Dongguashan Copper Mine, Tongling Nonferrous Metals Group, Tongling Anhui 244000, China)
关键词:
安全态度; 调查设计; 量化研究; 矿山企业; 统计分析; 李克特格式; 安全管理
Keywords:
safety attitude;  survey design;  quantitative research;  mining enterprises;  statistical analysis; Likert-type;  safety management
分类号:
X92
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.12.030
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探索科学、有效的矿山企业从业人员安全态度调查方法，为矿山企业不安全行为管理提供理论依据，应用现代安全管理和量化研究理论与方法，按照态度的认知、情感与意向三种成分，采用李克特格式量表法，设计27道安全态度调查问卷题。选取某矿山企业各岗位从业人员代表320人开展问卷调查，经甄别筛选后确立有效问卷调查表272份。应用SPSS软件建立数据库，经信度与效度检验，调查问卷符合测量学信度要求，结构效度在可接受范围。调查结果表明，该矿从业人员的安全态度相对集中，安全认知正确，安全情感和行为意向积极，但未形成统一、正确的安全理念，不安全行为分析与管理时需予以重视。
Abstract:
To explore the scientific and effective survey methods on safety attitudes of employees, and provide a theoretical basis for unsafe behavior management of mining enterprise, by applying the theories and methods of modern safety management and quantitative research, according to the three components of attitude including cognition, emotion and intention, using the Likert-type scale, 27 questionnaire titles were designed to investigate the safety attitude. 320 representatives of employees in each post of mining enterprises were selected to conduct a questionnaire survey, and 272 effective questionnaires were determined by screening. The database was established by applying SPSS software, and through the reliability and validity test, the questionnaire met the reliability requirement of psychometric, and the structure validity was in the acceptable range. The results showed that the safety attitudes of practitioners in this enterprise were relatively concentrated, the safety cognition was correct, the safety emotion and behavior intention were positive, but the unified and correct safety concept was not conformed, which should be emphasized in analysis and management on unsafe behavior.

参考文献/References:

［1］廖国礼，王胜强，王鹰鹏，等．矿山企业三维预防安全管理体系理论及其模型研究［J］. 中国安全科学学报，2014，24(4):3-9 LIAO Guo-li，WANG Sheng-qiang，WANG Ying-peng，et al．Research on theory and model of three-dimensional prevent safety management system of mining enterprises［J］．China Safety Science Journal，2014，24(4):3-9
［2］张江石，傅贵，王祥尧，等．行为安全绩效关系研究［J］. 煤炭学报，2009，34(6):857-861 ZHANG Jiang-shi，FU Gui，WANG Xiang-yao，et al．Relationship between behavior and safety performance［J］．Journal of China Coal Society，2009，34(6):857-861
［3］托马斯. C. 谢林［美］．微观动机与宏观行为［M］. 谢静，邓子梁，李天有，译. 北京：中国人民大学出版社，2002:1-6
［4］孙泽厚，罗帆．管理心理与行为学［M］. 武汉：武汉理工大学出版社，2006:131-145
［5］李乃文，黄鹏．变革型领导行为、安全态度、安全绩效的关系［J］. 软科学，2012，26(1):68-71 LI Nai-wen，HUANG Peng．The relationship between transformational leadership，safety attitude and safety performance［J］．Soft Science，2012，26(1):68-71
［6］王华容，施利承，谭顶良．儿童交通安全意识问卷的编制及现状调查［J］. 中国安全科学学报，2013，22(8):10-15 WANG Hua-Rong，SHI Li-cheng，TAN Ding-liang．Preparation and Application of Children Traffic Safety Awareness Questionnaire［J］．China Safety Science Journal，2014，22(8):10-15
［7］C. D. 威肯斯［美］, J. D. 李［美］,刘乙力［美］．人因工程学导论［M］．张侃，译. 上海：华东师范大学出版社，2007:22-23；371-372
［8］刘茂．事故风险分析理论与方法［M］．北京：北京大学出版社，2012:7-22
［9］廖国礼，关清安，荆宁川．矿山安全管理核心框架结构研究［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术，2010，6(1):173-177 LIAO Guo-li，GUAN Qing-an，JING Ning-chuan．Research on key safety management framework for mining enterprises and its operational mechanism［J］．Journal of Safety Science and Technology，2010，6(1):173-177
［10］马如宏．人因工程［M］. 北京：北京大学出版社，2011:289-303
［11］邱皓政．量化研究与统计分析［M］. 重庆：重庆大学出版社，2013:98-105
［12］马建全，李广杰，徐佩华．基于拉丁方抽样及K-S检验的边坡可靠性分析［J］. 岩石力学，2011，32(7):2154-2156 MA Jian-quan，LI Guang-jie，XU Pei-hua．Study on safety performance indexes［J］．Rock and Soil Mechanics，2011，32(7):2154-2156
［13］王璐，王沁．统计软件SPASS完全学习手册与实践精粹［M］. 北京：化学工业出版社，2013:109-110

相似文献/References:

[1]成家磊,祁神军,张云波.组织氛围对建筑工人不安全行为的影响机理及实证研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(11):11.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.11.002]
　CHENG Jialei,QI Shenjun,ZHANG Yunbo.Influence mechanism and empirical study of organizational climate on unsafe behavior of construction workers[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(12):11.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.11.002]
[2]齐晓云,刘杰.机场火灾旅客安全态度、风险感知与非适应性疏散行为的关系研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(10):46.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.10.007]
　QI Xiaoyun,LIU Jie.Research on relationship among safety attitude,risk perception and non-adaptive evacuation behavior of passengers in airport fire[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2021,17(12):46.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.10.007]
[3]王永刚,王慧莹.安全教育对机务维修人员违规行为的影响路径研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2023,19(7):192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.07.028]
　WANG Yonggang,WANG Huiying.Research on influence path of safety education on violation behavior of maintenance personnel[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2023,19(12):192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.07.028]
[4]陈子涵,李磊,欧阳有鹏,等.非正式组织视角下煤矿工人群体动力对不安全行为驱动因素分析*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2024,20(3):126.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.03.018]
　CHEN Zihan,LI Lei,OUYANG Youpeng,et al.Analysis on driving factors of group dynamics on unsafe behavior of coal miners from perspective of informal organization[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2024,20(12):126.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.03.018]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家科技重大专项课题（2011ZX05040-001-006）；国家科技支撑计划项目（2012BAK09B02-06）
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-12-30