|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]廖苏亮,韩力,刘鑫鹏,等.液化天然气加注船安全定量风险分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(11):187-192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.11.032]
　LIAO Su-liang,HAN Li,LIU Xin-peng,et al.Study on quantitative risk analysis for safety of LNG fueling vessel[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(11):187-192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.11.032]
点击复制

液化天然气加注船安全定量风险分析
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
10
期数:
2014年11期
页码:
187-192
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2014-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on quantitative risk analysis for safety of LNG fueling vessel
作者:
廖苏亮; 韩力; 刘鑫鹏; 郭开华
中山大学工学院，广东广州510006）
Author(s):
LIAO Su-liang;  HAN Li;  LIU Xin-peng;  GUO Kai-hua
（Engineering School, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou Guangdong 510006, China）
关键词:
液化天然气; 加注船; 安全; 定量风险评估
Keywords:
liquefied natural gas;  fueling vessel;  safety;  quantitative risk assessment
分类号:
X932
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.11.032
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
液化天然气（LNG）加注船是一种为LNG动力船提供燃料的新型船舶，国内目前尚处于起步阶段，缺乏相关安全标准和规范。采用国际定量风险评价（QRA）的通用理念，研究适用于我国LNG加注船的安全评价方法，提出具体实施步骤和依据准则，并以国内某LNG加注船作为实例分析说明。建立加注船LNG火灾事故树，确定相关火灾事故概率；研究适合加注船火灾事故后果的方形火焰模型，以及LNG火灾热辐射对人体伤害的计算方法；参考国际海事组织（IMO）的风险准则，确定LNG加注船个人风险和社会风险；最后与按NFPA-59A计算的防火间距作对比分析。通过计算，例中加注船的风险位于须采取相关安全措施的ALARP区域，风险控制区域半径20m。若按NFPA-59A要求计算防火间距，该加注船对外部须划定半径52m区域作为安全区域，且须将船身增长37m以满足内部防火要求，在实际工程中无法实现，相比较QRA方法更适合我国LNG加注船的安全评价工作。
Abstract:
Liquefied natural gas (LNG) fueling vessel is a new ship used for adding fuel to LNG power ship. At present, the domestic LNG vessel is still in initial stage and lacking of relevant safety standards and specifications. The method being applicable to assess the safety of LNG fueling vessel in China was studied by applying the general idea of QRA (Quantitative risk assessment), the specific implementation procedures and criterions were put forward, and the analysis and explanation were conducted by taking a domestic fueling vessel as example. The fault tree of fire accident in fueling vessel was established to estimate the probability of relevant fire accident. The rectangle fire model fitted to fire accident consequence of fueling vessel and the calculation method of human body injury by thermal radiation of LNG fire were studied. Then the individual and social risk of LNG fueling vessel were determined by referring to the IMO risk criteria. At last, the comparative analysis on fire prevention distance with the calculation result of NFPA-59A was conducted. The results showed that: the risk of LNG fueling vessel in the case is located in the ALARP region, which means some mitigation measure should be taken, and the radius of risk control region is 20m. If calculating the fire prevention distance according to NFPA-59A, the safety region with 52m as radius should be defined outside the fueling vessel, and the length of vessel should be stretched by 37m to meet the requirements of internal fire prevention, which are unrealizable in practical engineering. Comparatively speaking, the QRA method is more fit for the safety evaluation of LNG fueling vessel in our country.

参考文献/References:

［1］王卫琳,林权.采用LNG作为船用燃料的探讨［J］.煤气与热力, 2013, 33(3):10-14
［2］AS DNV. MARPOL73/78 Annex VI［J］.Regulations for the Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships,2009
［3］Dr. Gerd-Michael Würsig. LNG for Ships-the key elements ［R］.2012-06-20
［4］World's first LNG fuelled product tanker now in service［N］.News Archive，2011
［5］胡蝶.武汉轮渡成功试“喝”天然气［N］.武汉晚报，2010
［6］范洪军,张晖,徐建勇.LNG加注趸船的池火危险距离分析［J］.中国造船, 2013 (4)：
［7］NFPA 59A-2013.Standard for the production, storage, and handling of liquefied natural gas (LNG) ［S］. National Fire Protection Association. 2013
［8］于立见,多英全,罗爱民.定量风险评价中泄漏概率的确定方法探讨［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2007,3(6):27-30 YU Li-jian, DUO Ying-quan, LUO Ai-min. Method for determinating probabilities of leaks in quantitative risk assessment［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2007,3(6):27-30
［9］吴宗之. 城市土地使用安全规划的方法与内容探讨［J］.安全与环境学报,2004,4(6):86-90
［10］OGP. Risk Assessment Data Directory［R］.2010,03
［11］SAFEDOR, 2005, “Risk Evaluation Criteria”［R］. SAFEDOR D.4.5.2
［12］多英全,魏利军,罗艾民,等.定量风险评价程序初探［J］.中国科技信息,2007,(24):330-331
［13］郭开华, 王文静, 皇甫立霞, 等. LNG 站场防火间距及安全性分析［J］. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(10): 90-94
［14］P.K.Raj. Spectrum of Fires in an LNG Facility Assessments, Models and Consideration in Risk Evaluations ［R］. The U. S. Department of Transportation, 2006
［15］C.M.Pietersen. Consequences of accidental releases of hazardous material ［J］.Loss Prevention in the Process Industry, 1990, (3): 136-141
［16］Demark. FSA-Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Carriers,［S］ Details of the Formal Safety Assessment. MSC 83/INF.3,IMO,2007

相似文献/References:

[1]王文静,孙标,郭开华.液化天然气场站事故定量风险评价方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(4):114.
　WANG Wen-jing,SUN Biao,GUO Kai-hua.Quantitative Risk Analysis for LNG Station Accidents[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):114.
[2]屈宜生,胡伟.液化天然气（LNG）储运罐车泄漏应急处置技术与方法[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(4):99.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.04.018]
　QU Yi sheng,HU Wei.Emergency disposal technology and method for leakage of liquefied natural gas ( LNG ) storage tank[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(11):99.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.04.018]
[3]多英全.液化天然气燃料动力船舶定量风险分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(12):90.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.12.015]
　DUO Ying-quan.Quantitative risk analysis to LNGpowered ship[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(11):90.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.12.015]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
广东省教育厅液化天然气与低温技术重点实验室（39000-3211101）；中山大学-BP液化天然气中心（99103-9390001）
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-11-30