|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]黄亮亮,姚安林,魏沁汝,等.基于RBI与多米诺效应的输气站场设备定量风险评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(5):90-94.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.05.015]
 HUANG Liangliang,YAO Anlin,WEI Qingru,et al.Quantitative risk assessment of facilities in gas transmission station based on RBI and domino effect[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(5):90-94.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.05.015]
点击复制

基于RBI与多米诺效应的输气站场设备定量风险评价
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
10
期数:
2014年5期
页码:
90-94
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2014-05-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Quantitative risk assessment of facilities in gas transmission station based on RBI and domino effect
文章编号:
20140515
作者:
黄亮亮 姚安林 魏沁汝 许 萍 李 平
(西南石油大学 石油工程学院,四川 成都 610500)
Author(s):
HUANG Liangliang YAO Anlin WEI Qingru XU Ping LI Ping
(College of Petroleum Engineering,Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu Sichuan 610500,China)
关键词:
输气站场设备风险多米诺效应RBI定量评价
Keywords:
gas transmission stationrisk of facilitydomino effectRBI quantitative assessment
分类号:
X937
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.05.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对目前输气站场设备风险评价方法仅以单个设备为评价对象,并未考虑设备间相互影响的特点,提出将多米诺效应分析引入输气站场设备风险评价当中,再结合RBI(基于风险检测方法)对输气站场设备进行定量风险评价。首先,计算所评价设备的失效概率与危险指数,得到设备固有风险;然后对设备的多米诺效应风险进行计算;最后,得到设备总风险。实例分析表明,考虑多米诺效应风险后,站场单个设备的风险要明显增大。
Abstract:
The current assessment methods focus on single facility and ignore influences between facilities, so a method of quantitative assessment with domino effect analysis and RBI(risk-based inspection technology) was proposed to assess facilities risks of gas transmission station. Firstly, the inherent risk of the facility was obtained with failure probability and hazard index calculated. Then, the risk of domino effect was ascertained. At last, the total risk of facility was calculated. Example analysis verified that the risk of single facility in gas transmission increases significantly when taking domino effect risk into account.

参考文献/References:

[1]施林圆,郑洁,李晶. 四川输气站场风险评价研究[J]. 天然气工业,2004,24(11):135-138 SHI Lin-yuan, ZHENG Jie, LI Jing. Risk evaluation of gas transmission stations in Sichuan[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2004, 24(11): 135-138
[2]谷志宇,帅健,董绍华. 应用API 581对输气站场进行定量风险评价[J]. 天然气工业,2006,26(5):111-114 GU Zhi-yu, SHUAI Jian, DONG Shao-hua. Quantitative risk assessment on gas transmission station with API 581[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2006, 26(5): 111-114
[3]郑明,姚安林,叶冲,等. 基于RBI的输气站场分离器风险评估方法研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(6):120-126 ZHENG Ming, YAO An-lin, YE Chong, et al. Study on risk assessment method of separator in gas station based on RBI[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2013,9(6):120-126
[4]张永强,相艳景,毛星,等. 多米诺效应的风险分析方法[J]. 安全与环境学报,2008,8(6):152-159 ZHANG Yong-qiang, XIANG Yan-jing, MAO Xing, et al. Review on the quantitative analysis of the domino effect risk assessment[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2008, 8(6): 152-159
[5]Bahman A,Che Rosmani C H,Mahar D H,et al. Anatomy of a domino accident: Roots, triggers and lessons learnt[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2012, 90: 424-429
[6]API 581—2008. Risk-based Inspection Technology[S].
[7]CPR 18E. Guideline for quantitative risk assessment (Purple Book)[M]. The Hague: Directorate General for Social Affairs and Employment, TNO, 2005
[8]陈明亮. 化工装置事故的多米诺效应定量分析关键问题研究[D]. 北京:北京化工大学,2013
[9]Cozzani V, Gubinelli G,Antonioni G, et al. The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2005, (127): 14-30
[10]蒋军成. 事故调查与分析技术[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社,2004: 236-239
[11]Zhang Ming-guang, Jiang Jun-cheng. An improved probit method for assessment of domino effect to chemical process equipment caused by overpressure[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, (158): 280-286

相似文献/References:

[1]赵新好,姚安林,郭〓磊,等.基于AHP-熵权法的输气站场区块风险因素 权重确定方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(10):91.
 ZHAO Xin hao,YAO An lin,GUO Lei,et al.Study on determination of risk factors weight at process units in gas transmission station based on AHPentropy method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(5):91.
[2]郑明,姚安林,叶冲,等.基于RBI的输气站场分离器风险评估方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(6):120.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.06.023]
 ZHENG Ming,YAO An lin,YE Chong,et al.Study on risk assessment method of separator in gas station based on RBI[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(5):120.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.06.023]
[3]黄亮亮,姚安林,杨鲁明,等.基于T-S模糊故障树的输气站场设备失效可能性研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(8):144.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.08.026]
 HUANG Liang-liang,YAO An-lin,YANG Lu-ming,et al.Study on failure possibility of facilities in gas transmission station based on T-S fuzzy FTA[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(5):144.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.08.026]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家“十二五”科技支撑计划项目(2011BAK06B01-11-01)
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-05-31