[1]杨国梁,多英全,王振华,等.大型原油储罐火灾多米诺效应概率计算模型及应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(8):130-134.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.08.024]
YANG Guo liang,DUO Ying quan,WANG Zhen hua,et al.Study on fire domino effect probability of large crude oil storage tanks[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(8):130-134.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.08.024]
点击复制
大型原油储罐火灾多米诺效应概率计算模型及应用
YANG Guo liang,DUO Ying quan,WANG Zhen hua,et al.Study on fire domino effect probability of large crude oil storage tanks[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(8):130-134.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.08.024]
《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]
- 卷:
- 9
- 期数:
- 2013年8期
- 页码:
- 130-134
- 栏目:
- 职业安全卫生管理与技术
- 出版日期:
- 2013-08-30
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Study on fire domino effect probability of large crude oil storage tanks
- 文章编号:
- 20130824
- Keywords:
- tank fire; domino effect probability; tank space; tank layout
- 分类号:
- X973
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 随着油品储罐区规模的不断扩大，近年来多储罐火灾事故呈上升趋势。现有的储罐防火间距是在以往事故经验的基础上设定的，通过罐组内的火灾多米诺效应概率计算，可从风险的角度为罐组内储罐防火间距的设定提供理论依据。通过综合考虑火灾环境下受辐射储罐失效时间和着火储罐火灾得到控制时间，确定了罐组内火灾多米诺效应的判定原则，并在火灾得到控制时间模型和储罐失效时间模型的基础上建立了火灾多米诺效应概率计算模型。以2万立外浮顶原油储罐为例进行模拟计算，得出在现行标准给出的防火间距下，发生罐组火灾多米诺效应的概率为3.94×10-8/a-1，属于可接受风险，为罐组内储罐的合理布局提供了理论依据。
- Abstract:
- With the continuous expansion of oil tank farm and single tank volume, in recent years, multitanks fire accidents on the rise. The existing tank space is set on the basis of the previous accident experience. The quantitative calculation of domino effect probability caused by tank fire provides a theoretical basis for tank space setting. By the study of time to effective mitigation and time to failure, the domino effect impact probability model was proposed. Through analog computation of 2×104m3 floating roof tank of petroleum, the conclusion is get that the domino effect probability caused by tank fire in a group of tanks is 3.94×10-8/a-1, is acceptable risk.
参考文献/References:
[1]郎需庆,刘全桢.几起油库重大火灾事故引发的思考［J］.消防技术与产品信息,2008,34,10
LANG Xuqing，LIU Quanzhen. Several major oil depot fire accident［J］. Fire Technique and Products Information, 2008,34,10
[2］Gabriele Landucci. The assessment of the damage probability of storage tanks in domino events triggered by fire［J］. Accident Analysis and Prevention,2009,41: 12061215
[3］师立晨,刘骥,魏利军,等.重大危险源多米诺效应的后果分析［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2007,3（6） : 4448
SHI Lichen, LIU ji, WEI Lijun， et al. Consequence analysis for domino effect of major hazardous installations［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology， 2007,3（6）: 4448
[4］Gledhill, I．Lines．Development of methods to assess the significance of domino effects from major hazard sites, CR Report 183,Health and Safety Executive,1998
[5］Khan FI,Abbasi SA．Models for domino effect analysis in chemical process industries．Process Safety Progress［J］． 1998,17（2）: 107113
[6］Valerio Cozzani, Gianfilippo Gubinelli, The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis［J］.Journal of Hazardous Materials.2005: 1430
[7］V．Cozzani, G．Gubinelli, E．Salzano, Escalation thresholds in the assessment of domino accidental events, Journal of Hazardous Materials［J］．2006,129: 121
[8］Casal J．et al．ARAMlS—Severity evaluation．Research report,2004
[9］GB500742002, 石油库设计规范 ［S］.北京,中国石油化工集团公司，2003(3)
GB500742002, Code for design of oil depot ［S］. Beijing, China Petrochemical Corporation, 2003(3)
[10］高建明,王喜奎,曾明荣.个人风险和社会风险可接受标准研究进展及启示［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2007,3（3）:2934
GAO Jianming, WANG Xikui, ZENG Mingrong. The research development and indication of the acceptable standard of individual risk and social risk［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2007,3（3）:2934
[11］CCPS. Layer of Protection Analysis: Simplified Process Risk Assessment［M］.New York, 2001
相似文献/References:
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
- 国家“十二五”科技支撑计划项目（ 2012BAK13B01）
