|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]白永忠,张杰东,党文义,等.火炬火焰监测技术实验测试及对比研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(6):137-140.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.06.026]
 BAI Yong zhong,ZHANG Jie dong,DANG Wen yi,et al.Experimental test and comparison of flare flame monitoring technology[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(6):137-140.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.06.026]
点击复制

火炬火焰监测技术实验测试及对比研究
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
9
期数:
2013年6期
页码:
137-140
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2013-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Experimental test and comparison of flare flame monitoring technology
作者:
白永忠12张杰东2党文义2于安峰2蒋军成1
(1.南京工业大学 城市建设与安全工程学院,南京210009;2. 中国石化青岛安全工程研究院,青岛266071)
Author(s):
BAI Yong zhong 12 ZHANG Jie dong 2 DANG Wen yi 2 YU An feng 2 JIANG Jun cheng 1
( 1 School of Urban Construction and Safety Engineering, Nanjing University of Technology, Nanjing Jiangsu 210009, China; 2 Qingdao Safety Engineering Institute, SINOPEC, Qingdao Shandong 266071, China)
关键词:
火炬 长明灯 火焰监测技术 Labview
Keywords:
flare pilot flare system flame monitoring technology Labview
分类号:
X937
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.06.026
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
基于Labview软件,开展热电偶探测、紫外火焰探测、离子火焰监测系统对火炬长明灯火焰响应的实验研究和数据分析。通过分析比较不同火焰监测系统的响应信号,得出以下结论:热电偶监测技术响应时间较长;紫外监测技术响应时间为2-4s,但其输出电压值较小,且在实际运行过程中无法区分高空点火器火焰及长明灯火焰;火焰离子监测技术响应时间为2-6s,输出信号强,容易实现火焰燃烧状态的快速判断。
Abstract:
The response signals of thermocouple monitoring system, ultraviolet monitoring system and flame ionization monitoring system were tested and analyzed using Data Acquisition(DAQ) card and Labview software. Results showed that the response time of thermocouple monitoring system is 15-3min, and the response time of ultraviolet monitoring system is 2-4s, but its output voltage is smaller, and could not distinguish the pilot flame from the high level igniter flame. The response time of flame ionization monitoring system is 2-6s and its output signal is strong enough to detect the flame in a short time.

参考文献/References:

[1]R. Schwartz, J. White, W. Bussman, The John Zink Combustion Handbook[M]. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2001.
[2]白永忠.HAZOP技术在炼油火炬系统工艺危害分析中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(10):106111 BAI Yongzhong. Application of HAZOP in the process hazard analysis on a petrochemical flare system[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2011,7(10):106111.
[3]宋智博, 王峰, 王成硕. 基于HAZOP分析的加氢装置工程设计方法[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2012, 8(6): 143147 SONG Zhibo, WANG Feng, WANG Chengshuo. Engineering design approach based on HAZOP analysis method for hydrogenation unit[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012, 8(6): 143147.
[4]U.S. Code of federal regulations. 40 CFR §6018(f) (2)[Z].
[5]API5372008, Flare details for general refinery and petrochemical service[S]..
[6]李忠虎.热电偶应用问题综述[J].工业计量, 2007,(2):3437 LI Zhonghu. Review on the thermocouple application[J]. Industrial Measurement, 2007,(2):3437.
[7]董政,黄大贵,黄逸平,等. 紫外火焰探测器响应时间测试系统的研究[J]. 电子科技大学学报, 2006, 35(4): 682684 DONG Zheng, HUANG Dagui, HUANG Yiping, et al. Research on response time test system for ultraviolet fire detector[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2006, 35(4): 682684.
[8]雍占锋, 常峥, 吴立志. 基于图像处理的火焰监测与燃烧诊断技术研究现状[J]. 北京石油化工学院学报, 2006,14(1): 3842 YONG Zhanfeng, CHANG Zheng, WU Lizhi. Research on flame monitoring and combustion diagnosis techniques based on image processing[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of PetroChemical Technology, 2006,14(1): 3842.
[9]徐思杰, 火焰离子检测技术在燃气器具安全保护中的应用[J]. 煤气与热力, 1996, 16(2): 3740 XU Enjie. The flame ion detecting techique applying for gas utensil safeguasding[J]. Gas & Heat, 1996, 16(2): 3740.
[10]黄利斌. 利用火焰导电特性开发燃气燃烧器熄火保护装置[J].有色金属加工, 2004,33(2): 4446 HUANG Libin. Development of flameout protection device for gas bumer based on flame conductivity[J]. Nonferrous Metals Processing, 2004,33(2): 4446.
[11]CN202692081U. 离子点火与火焰燃烧状态监测器[S].
[12]CN202693521U. 火焰离子监测器[S].
[13]J. Bellovich, J. Franklin, B. Schwartz. Flare pilot system safety[J]. Process Safety Progress, 2007, 26(1): 1014 .

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-06-30