|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]章能胜,张黔生,谢贤平,等.三种确定矿井通风系统设计方案评价指标权重的方法比较[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(12):38-43.
　ZHANG Neng sheng,ZHANG Qian sheng,XIE Xian ping,et al.Comparative study on three methods for the evaluation index weight of design scheme on mine ventilation system[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(12):38-43.
点击复制

三种确定矿井通风系统设计方案评价指标权重的方法比较
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
8
期数:
2012年12期
页码:
38-43
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2012-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative study on three methods for the evaluation index weight of design scheme on mine ventilation system
文章编号:
1673-193X（2012）-12-0038-06
作者:
章能胜1; 张黔生2; 谢贤平1; 李锦峰1; 吴洋1
（1昆明理工大学，云南 昆明〓650093）（2云南巨星安全技术有限公司， 云南 昆明〓650106）
Author(s):
ZHANG Neng sheng 1; ZHANG Qian sheng 2; XIE Xian ping 1;  LI Jin feng 1; WU Yang 1
（1Kunming University of Science and Technology，Kunming， Kunming Yunnan 650093，China）（2Safety Technology Company Limited of Yunnan Superstar，Kunming Yunnan 650106，China）
关键词:
矿井通风系统; 设计方案; 指标权重; 专家评议法; 层次分析法; 模糊群体决策法
Keywords:
mine ventilation system; design scheme; index weight; delphi method; analytic hierarchy process; fuzzy group decision
分类号:
X936
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
影响矿井通风系统设计方案合理性的因素主要分三个方面，共12项评价指标。应用专家评议法、层次分析法和模糊群体决策法，对同一矿井通风系统设计方案的评价指标体系进行权重分析，得出不同的评价指标权值。根据计算结果进行比较分析，可知当同组专家对同一矿井通风系统设计方案评价指标进行权重分析时，虽然选用专家评议法和模糊群体决策法这两种不同方法，得出的评价指标权重大小及排序基本一致；而当不同专家或分析者对同一评价指标体系进行权重分析时，由于他们对各评价指标的重要性偏好不同，不同方法计算出的评价指标权重大小及排序不一致。
Abstract:
The influencing factors on the rationality of the design scheme for mine ventilation system have three aspects，which include 12 indexes. There are three calculation methods of the evaluation index weight in general，which include the delphi method，the analytic hierarchy process and the fuzzy group decision. These methods were used to analyze the evaluation index weight of the same design scheme for the mine ventilation system，which acquired different evaluation index weight in this paper. According to the comparative analysis of the calculation results， the following conclusions were obtained. When a group of experts analyzed the evaluation index weight of the same design scheme for the mine ventilation system，although two methods of delphi method and fuzzy group decision were used to analyze the evaluation index weight，the weight size and order of the evaluation indexs were nearly the same. But when different experts or analysts analyzed the evaluation index weight of the same design scheme for the mine ventilation system，the weight size and order of the evaluation indexs were not the same by using different methods. It was because that different experts or analysts had different importance preference of the evaluation index weight.

参考文献/References:

-

相似文献/References:

[1]韩艳杰,张志军,李亚俊.基于新型综合集成法的矿井通风系统安全评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(2):75.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.02.013]
　HAN Yan jie,ZHANG Zhi jun,LI Ya jun.Evaluation of mine ventilation system safety based on new comprehensive integrated method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(12):75.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.02.013]
[2]马恒,苗倩斐,韩宝华,等.矿井通风系统稳定性SD预测仿真分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(12):108.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.12.018]
　MA Heng,MIAO Qianfei,HAN Baohua,et al.SD prediction and simulation analysis on stability of mine ventilation system[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2019,15(12):108.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.12.018]
[3]刘剑,刘丽,黄德,等.基于风量-风压复合特征的通风系统阻变型故障诊断[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(1):85.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.01.014]
　LIU Jian,LIU Li,HUANG De,et al.Resistance variant fault diagnosis of ventilation system based on composite features of air volume and air pressure[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(12):85.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.01.014]
[4]程刚,陆卫东,陈志峰,等.基于FAHP-MODM的矿井通风系统可靠性综合评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(2):99.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.02.016]
　CHENG Gang,LU Weidong,CHEN Zhifeng,et al.Comprehensive evaluation on reliability of ventilation system in mine based on FAHP-MODM[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(12):99.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.02.016]
[5]邵良杉,张佳琦,于保才,等.基于TF-熵权法的矿井通风系统可靠性可拓评价*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(4):106.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.04.015]
　SHAO Liangshan,ZHANG Jiaqi,YU Baocai,et al.Extension evaluation on reliability of mine ventilation system based on TF-entropy weight method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(12):106.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.04.015]
[6]夏侯遐迩,颜紫璇,罗扬,等.面向设计的地铁车站防火安全韧性评价*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(12):169.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.12.024]
　XIAHOU Xiaer,YAN Zixuan,LUO Yang,et al.Design-oriented evaluation on fire safety resilience of subway station[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(12):169.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.12.024]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2012-12-31