|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]向隅.煤矿安全文化评价系统的研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(7):209.
　XIANG Yu.Study on the evaluation system of coal mine safety culture[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(7):209.
点击复制

煤矿安全文化评价系统的研究
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
8
期数:
2012年7期
页码:
209
栏目:
出版日期:
2012-07-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the evaluation system of coal mine safety culture
作者:
向隅
(武汉铁路职业技术学院，武汉 430205)
Author(s):
XIANG Yu
(Wuhan Railway Vocational College of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China)
关键词:
煤矿安全文化; 综合评价; AHM; TOPSIS
Keywords:
coal mine safety culture;  comprehensive evaluation;  AHM;  TOPSIS
分类号:
X936；TD7
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
提出了一种将组合评价方法(AHM方法和TOPSIS方法)应用于煤矿安全文化的评价思路和方法。根据煤矿安全文化的特点，构建了由10个指标(企业精神、安全目标、安全风气、企业形象、人文环境、安全管理体制、安全操作规程、安全措施、安全防护设施和安全工作条件)组成的煤矿安全文化评价模型，利用AHM方法确定指标的权重，采用改进的TOPSIS方法对煤矿企业的安全文化进行评价。同时，简要介绍了基于Web技术的评价系统实现的主要功能、评价模块。最后以某煤矿公司作为该评价模型的实例，对其下辖的5家企业安全文化方面进行了评价分析。结果表明，该组合评价方法较传统的定性评估更为科学、客观，为煤矿公司对下辖企业的安全文化评价提供了可靠参考，也为煤矿企业在安全文化建设方面指明了方向。
Abstract:
In the thesis, a kind of thought and approach that AHM method and TOPSIS method have been used to evaluate coal mine safety culture was put forward. In terms of the characteristics of coal mine safety culture, the evaluation model of coal mine safety culture consisted of 10 evaluation indexes including the spirit of enterprise, the goal of safety, the habits on safety, the image of enterprise, the surroundings of humanity, the safety management system, the regulations of safe operation, safety measures, the safety protection facilities and the conditions of safe operation. The evaluation model evaluated coal mine safety culture through the relative index weight which were defined by AHM, and improved TOPSIS method. In addition, the main function and evaluation module of the evaluation system based on Web technology were briefly introduced. Finally, the coal mine safety culture of five enterprises with the example of a certain coal mine enterprise as an evaluation module were evaluated analyticaly. The result of evaluation indicated that the combined evaluation method is scientific and objective compared with the traditional qualitative analysis, which provides the reliable references to the evaluation of coal mine safety culture, and shows the direction of the construction of coal mine safety culture for the coal mine enterprises.

参考文献/References:

-

相似文献/References:

[1]彭小红,莫志,崔西.基于模糊数学的石化企业安全状况评估系统[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(7):108.
　PENG Xiao hong,MO Zhi,CUI Xi.Assessment system of petrochemical enterprises safety production by fuzzy mathematics[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(7):108.
[2]常志朋,程龙生.基于模糊积分综合评价法的我国应急 物资对外采购能力评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(9):106.
　CHANG Zhi peng,CHENG Long sheng.Evaluation of capacity for foreign purchasing of emergency materials based on fuzzy integral synthetic evaluation method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(7):106.
[3]张黔生,谢贤平,吴劭星,等.矿山企业安全管理交互式模糊综合评价决策支持系统设计[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(1):125.
　ZHANG Qian-sheng,Xie Xian-ping,WU Shao-xing,et al.Design of an interactive fuzzy comprehensive evaluation decision support system for safety management of mine enterprises[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(7):125.
[4]朱桂明,程凌,高健,等.石化企业应急救援能力评估研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(2):82.
　ZHU Gui-ming,CHENG Ling,GAO Jian,et al.Study on emergency capability assessment of production accidents in Petrochemical enterprise based on extenic theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(7):82.
[5]陆路,李霖,李萍.城市公共建筑物火灾防范能力综合评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(12):68.
　LU Lu,LI Lin,LI Ping.comprehensive evaluation on fire prevention capacity of urban public buildings[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(7):68.
[6]赵一姝,白建平,刘菊梅,等.基于层次分析法的非常规气藏钻井安全综合分析评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(7):139.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.07.025]
　ZHAO Yi shu,BAI Jian ping,LIU Ju mei,et al.Comprehensive safety analysis and evaluation on unconventionalgas drilling operation based on AHP[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(7):139.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.07.025]
[7]袁春燕,杨剑耕,卢俊龙.模糊测度理论在施工现场安全目标决策中的应用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(3):101.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.03.017]
　YUAN Chun yan,YANG Jian geng,LU Jun long.Application of fuzzy measure theory in safety objective decision of construction site[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(7):101.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.03.017]
[8]王晓丽,魏志兵,彭士涛,等.基于主成分分析法的液体管道泄漏后果综合评价模型[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(5):85.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.05.014]
　WANG Xiaoli,WEI Zhibing,PENG Shitao,et al.Comprehensive assessment model of liquid pipeline leakage consequences based on principle component analysis[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(7):85.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.05.014]
[9]梁丽,李华,马伟红,等.模糊综合评判法在亚麻原料厂防尘工程技术措施综合评价中的应用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(6):134.
　LIANG li,LI Hua,MA Wei-hong,et al.Application and Research of Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation in the Comprehensive Assessment of Dust Control Engineering Technology Measures to Flax Raw Material Factory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(7):134.
[10]程凌,潘彤,徐辉波.基于可拓学石化装置失效后果严重度评估方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(3):185.
　CHENG Ling,PAN Tong,XU Hui bo.Study on seriousness assessment of petrol equipment failure based on extenic theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2009,5(7):185.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
湖北省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目(编号：2011yjte133)
更新日期/Last Update: 2012-08-06