|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]徐涛龙,姚安林,曾祥国,等.基于灰色关联分析的LNG接收终端人因事故辨识方法[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(9):97-101.
　XU Tao-long,?YAO An-lin,ZENG Xiang-guo,et al.Human Accidents Identification method of LNG Receiving Terminal Based on Grey Relational Analysis[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(9):97-101.
点击复制

基于灰色关联分析的LNG接收终端人因事故辨识方法()
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
7
期数:
2011年9期
页码:
97-101
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2011-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Human Accidents Identification method of LNG Receiving Terminal Based on Grey Relational Analysis
文章编号:
1673-193X(2011)-09-0097-05
作者:
徐涛龙1; 姚安林2; 曾祥国1; 李又绿2; 蒋宏业2
1.四川大学建筑与环境学院，成都 610065
2.西南石油大学石油工程学院，成都 610500
Author(s):
XU Tao-long1; ?YAO An-lin2;  ZENG Xiang-guo1;  LI You-lv2;  JIANG Hong-ye2
1.College of architecture and environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China
2.School of Petroleum Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China
关键词:
LNG接收终端; 人因事故; 灰色关联分析; HFACS; 辨识方法
Keywords:
LNG receiving terminal;  human accidents;  grey relational analysis;  HFACS;  identification method
分类号:
X91
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
陆岸LNG接收终端是LNG海上进口系统中的重要设施。针对我国LNG接收终端人因事故不断增多的现状,基于航空事故调查分析中的HFACS事故致因分析模型,将人因事故的影响因素归纳为个人因素、人际因素、环境因素、监督因素和组织因素五大类,结合灰色理论中的灰色关联分析,得到了LNG接收终端人因事故辨识方法。最后,运用该方法对某LNG接收终端人因事故进行辨识,通过灰关联度的计算,找出其最主要的不安全事件来自"个人因素"中的个人"安全意识不强"。此方法克服了小样本事故数据带来的弊端,对保障LNG接收终端的安全运行具有一定的指导意义。
Abstract:
Onshore LNG receiving terminal is an important facility in offshore LNG import system. According to the growing human accidents of LNG receiving terminals in China at present, based on the HFACS analysis of accident causation model which is used in the aviation accident investigation, the impact factors of human accidents are divided into five categories, which contain personal factors, group factors, environmental factors, supervision and organizational factors, and then obtain human accidents identification method of LNG receiving terminal based on grey relational analysis of gray theory. Finally, using this method to identify the accidents happened in an LNG receiving terminal, and find that the main insecurity events are “the unawareness of security” in “personal factors” by calculating the grey relational grade. This method overcomes the disadvantage due to the small sample of accident data, which has certain guiding sense to safeguard the safety operation of LNG receiving terminals.

参考文献/References:

[1]顾安忠，鲁雪生．液化天然气技术手册[M]．北京：机械工业出版社，2010，197-206．[2]陈雪，马国光等．我国LNG接收终端的现状及发展新动向[J]．煤气与热力，2007，27(8)：63-66．CHEN Xue, MA Guo-guang, et al.. Present status and new development trends of LNG terminal in China [J]. Gas & Heat, 2007, 27(8): 63-66.[3]王福建，俞传正等．灰色关联分析在道路交通事故中的应用[J]．中国安全科学学报，2006，16(2)：17-21．WANG Fu-jian, YU Chuan-zheng, et al.. Application of grey incidence analysis in road traffic accidents [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2006, 16(2): 17-21.[4]魏红州．煤矿事故人因失误因素的灰色模糊分析与研究[D]．太原理工大学，2007，24-31．WEI Hong-zhou. Analysis and study of human error of coalmine accident by the gray fuzzy methods [D]. Tai Yuan University of Technology, 2007, 24-31.[5]景国勋，张悦．火灾事故致因的多因素灰色关联分析[J]．中国安全科学学报，2009，19(3)：93-97．JING Guo-xun, ZHANG Yue. The multi-factor grey correlative analysis of fire accident causation [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2009, 19(3): 93-97.[6]王新民，丁德强等．灰色关联分析在地下采空区危险度评价中的应用[J]．中国安全生产科学技术，2006，2(4)：35-39．WANG Xin-ming, DING De-qiang, et al.. Applications of the grey relation analysis in the evaluation of the risk degree of the underground mined-out stopes [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2006, 2(4): 35-39.[7]孙建华，魏春荣等．煤矿信息不确定情况下的灰色关联度评价[J]．中国安全生产科学技术，2006，4(6)：95-97．SUN Jian-hua, WEI Chun-rong, et al.. Gray correlation assessment under the condition of uncertain information in cool mine [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2006, 4(6): 95-97.[8]道格拉斯A．维格曼，斯科特A．夏佩尔．飞行事故人的失误分析：人的因素分析与分类系统[M]．北京：中国民航出版社，2006．[9]张凤，于广涛等．影响我国民航飞行安全的个体与组织因素——基于HFACS框架的事件分析[J]．中国安全科学学报，2007，17(10)：67-74．ZHANG Feng, YU Guang-tao, et al.. Individual and organizational factors affecting Chinese civil aviation safety: event analysis based on HFACS framework [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2007, 17(10): 67-74.[10]Goldenhar L M, Williams L J, Swanson N G. Modeling relationships between job stressors and injury and near-miss outcomes for construction laborers [J]. Work & Stress, 2003, 17(3): 218-240.[11]Clarke S, Robertson I T. A meta-analytic review of the big five personality factors and accident involvement in occupational and non-occupational settings [J]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2005, 78(3): 355-376.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2011-03-01
作者简介：徐涛龙，博士研究生。
基金项目：中国石油西气东输管道公司项目（编号：XQS-GL01380）；国家科技支撑计划项目（编号：2006BAK02B01）
更新日期/Last Update: