|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王磊,陈东琼,李绪丰,等.基于RBI的碳五石油树脂装置风险评估分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(6):112-117.
 WANG Lei,CHEN Dong-qiong,LI Xu-feng,et al.Risk Assessment on C_5 Petroleum Resin Plant Based on RBI Technology[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(6):112-117.
点击复制

基于RBI的碳五石油树脂装置风险评估分析()
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
7
期数:
2011年6期
页码:
112-117
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2011-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Risk Assessment on C_5 Petroleum Resin Plant Based on RBI Technology
文章编号:
1673-193X(2011)-06-0112-06
作者:
王磊陈东琼李绪丰罗伟坚
广东省特种设备检测院,广州? 510655
Author(s):
WANG Lei CHEN Dong-qiong LI Xu-feng LUO Wei-jian
Institute of Guangdong Special Equipment Inspection, Guangzhou? 510655, China
关键词:
RBI碳五石油树脂装置风险评估检验优化策略
Keywords:
Risk Based Inspection C_5 Petroleum Resin Plant Risk Assessment Inspection Strategies for Optimization.
分类号:
X937
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
从技术特点、实施效用等方面,对QRA与RBI两类风险评估技术进行比较,选择使用RBI技术方法对碳五石油树脂装置内静设备及管道实施风险评估。运用挪威船级社的ORBIT Onshore软件定量计算评估范围内设备、管道风险值,评定风险等级,辨识隐患设备,然后从后果、可能性两方面分析产生风险的主要影响因素,经分析得知碳五石油树脂装置受H2S、HCl腐蚀减薄影响轻微,但NaOH导致的碱应力腐蚀对聚合反应后序工段中部分管道设备失效可能性影响较大。最后根据装置内存在的不同损伤机理提出检验优化策略,为装置定期检验工作提供科学的决策支持。
Abstract:
QRA (abbr. quantitative risk assessment) and RBI (abbr. risk based inspection) , two methods commonly used in chemical risk assessment, have been compared from technical characteristics, Implementation effectiveness, etc. By comparison, RBI is selected to carry on the risk assessment on fixed equipments and piping in the c_5 petroleum resin plant. The value of risk for each equipment and pipeline within the assessment range are calculated quantitatively to determine its risk level by using DNV (abbr. Det Norske Veritas) ORBIT Onshore software and the hidden-trouble equipment items are identified. Then, the influencing factors that cause risk are analyzed from two aspects, which are consequence and possibility of the failure. And it is known that the corrosion thickness-decreasing induced by H2S & HCl is minor in the c_5 petroleum resin plant, but the stress corrosion cracking induced by NaOH may have a significant impact on the failure possibility for some equipments and piping in the section after the polymerization reaction. Finally, Inspection strategies for optimization are given according to different damage mechanisms,which can provide scientific decision support for the c_5 petroleum resin plant periodic inspection.

参考文献/References:

[1] 邓廷昌,曹耀强,许翠红.C5石油树脂加氢技术[J]. 石化技术与应用,2007,25(3):203-205,209.DENG Ting-chang,CAO Yao-qiang, XU Cui-Hong. Hydrogenation Technology for C5 petroleum resin[J].Petrochemical Technology& Application,25(3) :203-205,209. [2] 王振华,罗文龙,郝军,罗艾民,多英全.化工装置风险排序及其应用?.中国安全生产科学技术[J] , 2007, 5(3): 105-107.WANG Zhen-hua, LUO Wen-long, HAO Jun, LUO Ai-min, DUO Ying-quan. Risk Ranking of Petroleum-chemistry Installations and its Applications[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2007, 5(3): 105-107. [3] 孙东亮,蒋军成.化工园区区域定量风险评价若干问题探讨.工业安全与环保[J],2010,36(5):50-59.SUN Dongliang JIANG Juncheng. Discussion on the Several Problems in Quantitative Risk Analysis of Chemical Industry Park Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection [J], 2010, 36(5):50-59. [4] 王勇,陈平,季华建,张春江.石化装置开展RBI技术需关注的几个问题[J].石油化工设备,2010,39(1):75-77.WANG Yong, CHEN Ping, JI Hua-jian, ZHANG Chun-jiang. Discussion on Crucial Points of RBI Technology in Petrochemical Plant[J].Petro-Chemical Euqipment,2010,39(1):75-77.[5] 陈钢,左尚志,陶雪荣等.承压设备的风险评估技术及其在我国的应用和发展趋势.中国安全生产科学技术[J].2005,1(1):31-35.CHEN Gang,ZUO Shang-zhi,TAO Xue-rong,etc. Risk Assessment of Special Equipment. Journal of Safety Science and Technology [J].2006, 2(1):92-94.[6] API 581,基于风险的检验资源文件[M].华盛顿:美国石油协会,2000. API 581, Risk-based Inspection Base Resource Documen [M]. Washington: American Petroleum Institute, 2000.[7] SYT 6653-2006,基于风险的检验(RBI)的基础方法[M].北京:国家发展和改革委员会, 2007. SYT 6653-2006, Risk-based Inspection Base Resource Document. Beijing[M]: The national development and reform commission,2007.[8] 成松柏,陈国华. 石化装置泄漏易发性预测方法应用研究[J].?灾害学,2008,23(2):106-111.CHENG Song-bai,CHEN Guo-hua.Study on the Application of Petrochemical Equipment Leakage Prediction Method[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2008, 23(2):106-111. [9] 张超,陈晓,陈建国,刘奕.考虑应急救援的危化品泄露事故后果风险评估[J],清华大学学报(自然科学版),2009,49(5):1-5.ZHANG Chao,CHEN Xiao,CHEN Jianguo,LIU Yi. Risk Assessment of Dangerous Chemical Leakage with Emergency Response [J].Journal of Tsinghua Univ (Sci &Tech),49(5):1-4. [10] API571,影响炼油工业中固定设备的损伤机理[M].华盛顿:美国石油协会,2003. API 571, Damage Mechanisms Affecting Fixed Equipment in the Refining Industry [M]. Washington: American Petroleum Institute, 2003.

相似文献/References:

[1]郑明,姚安林,叶冲,等.基于RBI的输气站场分离器风险评估方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(6):120.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.06.023]
 ZHENG Ming,YAO An lin,YE Chong,et al.Study on risk assessment method of separator in gas station based on RBI[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(6):120.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.06.023]
[2]黄亮亮,姚安林,魏沁汝,等.基于RBI与多米诺效应的输气站场设备定量风险评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(5):90.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.05.015]
 HUANG Liangliang,YAO Anlin,WEI Qingru,et al.Quantitative risk assessment of facilities in gas transmission station based on RBI and domino effect[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(6):90.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.05.015]
[3]王振华,罗文龙,郝军,等.化工装置风险排序及其应用*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(3):105.
 WANG Zhen hua,LUO Wen long,HAO Jun,et al.Risk ranking of petroleumchemistry installations and its applications[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2009,5(6):105.
[4]刘全,张东胜,程思闻,等.基于动态信息技术的设备主动维护预知平台的设计[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(7):99.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.07.018]
 LIU Quan,ZHANG Dong-sheng,CHENG Si-wen,et al.Design of predictive and proactive maintenance platform for equipments based on dynamic information technology[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(6):99.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.07.018]
[5]姚安林,黄亮亮,蒋宏业,等.输油气站场综合风险评价技术研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(1):138.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.01.023]
 YAO An-lin,HUANG Liang-liang,JIANG Hong-ye,et al.Research on comprehensive risk assessment technique of oil & gas transmission station[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(6):138.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.01.023]
[6]马欣,付晓君,余景刚,等.RBI技术应用于LNG设备上的改进研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(4):107.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2015.04.017]
 MA Xin,FU Xiao-jun,YU Jing-gang,et al.Study on improvement for application of RBI technology in LNG equipment[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(6):107.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193X.2015.04.017]
[7]肖飞,敬加强,凌爱军,等.基于API 581的燃烧与爆炸后果分析方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(9):41.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.09.007]
 XIAO Fei,JING Jiaqiang,LING Aijun,et al.Research on analysis methods of combustion and explosion consequence based on API 581[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(6):41.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.09.007]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2011-02-28
作者简介:王磊,硕士。
基金项目:国家质检总局科技计划项目资助(编号:2010QK064);广东省质量技术监督局科技项目(编号:2009ZT01)
更新日期/Last Update: