|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]魏巍,程长建.基于图形熵的化工应急响应预案复杂度评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(2):67-72.
 WEI Wei,CHENG Chang jian.The complexity evaluation of chemical emergency response plans based on Graphical Entropy[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(2):67-72.
点击复制

基于图形熵的化工应急响应预案复杂度评价
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
7
期数:
2011年2
页码:
67-72
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2011-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
The complexity evaluation of chemical emergency response plans based on Graphical Entropy
作者:
魏巍12程长建1
1.中国科学院自动化研究所,北京100190;2.装备指挥技术学院士官系,北京102249
Author(s):
WEI Wei12 CHENG Changjian1
1.Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;2. Academy of Equipment Command and Technology, Beijing 102249, China
关键词:
图形熵 化工应急预案 复杂度评价
Keywords:
Graphic Entropy chemical emergency plans complexity evaluation
分类号:
X937
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
面对突发化工事故,应急处理是控制事故后果、减少损失的有效措施,应急响应预案是应急处理的依据和指南。应急处理中人与系统的交互作用对于事故的缓解或恶化起着至关重要的作用,目前在应急人因失误的研究中纷纷强调操作员操作经验的重要性,而忽略了由于预案逻辑结构过于复杂、可读性太差导致操作员因不能完全理解预案而造成的操作失误,因此讨论了预案复杂度的评价方法。基于图形熵的概念,将文本预案转化为相应的图形,通过计算图形的一、二阶熵确定步骤的5个复杂度因子,进而通过合并步骤复杂度计算任务复杂度。最后,以化工“切换备用泵”的应急操作实例对计算方法进行了验证和说明,并针对计算结果给出了减小复杂度的具体措施。实践证明,该方法是有效的。
Abstract:
In the face of unexpected chemical accidents, emergency treatment is an effective measure to control the consequence and reduce the loss of accident. Emergency response plans are the basis and guideline for emergency treatment. The interaction between operator and system plays a vital role in alleviating or deteriorating the result of accident, however, the actual research about the human error in emergency response often stresses the importance of operators’ experience and ignores the human error resulted from not fully understanding the plans because of the complex logical structure and bad readability of plans. Therefore, the evaluation method of plans complexity based on Graphic Entropy is discussed, by transforming the text plans into corresponding graphics and calculating the first and second order entropy of these graphics to determine five complexity factor of step, then calculating the complexity of task through complexity of step. At last, take the example chemical emergency operation of switching the backpump for illuminating the calculation method, meanwhile, give the concrete measures to reduce the complexity. The results show that the evaluation method is effective.

参考文献/References:

[1]廖可兵,刘爱群.人的认知失误事件定量分析法的进展及应用[J]. 原子能科学技术,2009,43(4):322327 LIAO Kebing, LIU Aiqun. Development and Application for Quantification of Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2009, 43(4):322327
[2]袁宏永,苏国锋.论应急文本预案、数字预案与智能方案[J].中国应急管理, 2007(4): 1518 YUAN Hongyong, SU Guofeng. Discuss of Text plans, digital plans, intelligent plans [J]. China Emergency Management, 2007(4):1518
[3]Roth EM, et al. An empirical investigation of operator performance in cognitive demanding simulated emergencies. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CR6208, 1994
[4]Center for Chemical Process Safety. Guidelines for preventing human error in process safety. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1994
[5]Fruta K, et al. Human factor analysis of JCO criticality accident. Cognitive Technology Work 2000(2):182203
[6]O’Hare D, et al. Cognitive failure analysis for aircraft accident investigation. Ergonomics 1994, 37(11):18551869
[7]于瑛英, 池宏. 基于网络计划的应急操作预案的可操作性研究[J].公共管理学报,2007, 4(2):100107. YU Yingying, CHI Hong. Maneuverability evaluation of emergency plan based on network program [J].Journal Of Public Management, 2007, 4(2):100107
[8]韩芳, 秦练. 数字化应急预案可操作性评价系统设计与开发[J].计算机系统应用,2010,19(3):1216 HAN Fang,QIN Lian. Development of Emergency Response Plan complexity Evaluation System[J].Application of Computer Systems,2010,19(3):1216
[9]Mowshowitz A. Entropy and the complexity of graphs: I. An index of the relative complexity of a graph. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 1968(30):175204
[10]Rasmussen J. Information processing and humanmachine interaction: an approach to cognitive engineering, NorthHolland, 1986
[11]Park JK, Jung WD, Ha JJ, Park K. The step complexity measure for emergency operating procedures: measure verification. Reliability Engineering & system Safety, 2002(76):4559
[12]Park JK, Kim JW, Jung W. Comparing the complexity of procedural steps with the operators’ performance observed under stressful conditions. Reliability Engineering & system Safety, 2004(83):7991
[13]陈晓董,多英全.化工园区安全容量分析探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(2):10\|13 CHEN Xiao\|dong, DUO Ying\|quan. Researches on safety capacity of chemical industry park[J].Journal of Safety Science Technology,2009,5(2):10\|13
[14]于洋,魏利军.化工园区接警处警与应急值守系统的研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(6):156\|159 YU Yang, WEI Li\|jun. Research of the receive\|disposal alarm and emergency duty system for chemical industrial parks[J].Journal of Safety Science Technology,2009,5(6):156\|159

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2010-11-11 作者简介: 魏巍,讲师,博士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 2011-02-28