|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王若菌,赵雪娥,蒋军成,等.可拓综合评价在燃气系统泄漏事故应急救援中应用的研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(5):86-90.
　WANG Ruo-jun,ZHAO Xue-e,JIANG Jun-cheng,et al.Research about extensive comprehensive evaluation applying to emergency rescue of gas system leakage accident[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(5):86-90.
点击复制

可拓综合评价在燃气系统泄漏事故应急救援中应用的研究()
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
7
期数:
2011年5期
页码:
86-90
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2011-05-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research about extensive comprehensive evaluation applying to emergency rescue of gas system leakage accident
文章编号:
1673-193X(2011)-05-0086-05
作者:
王若菌1; 赵雪娥2; 蒋军成3; 徐艳英1
1.沈阳航空航天大学民航与安全工程学院，沈阳? 110136
2.郑州大学化工学院，郑州? 450001
3.南京工业大学，南京? 210009
Author(s):
WANG Ruo-jun1;  ZHAO Xue-e2;  JIANG Jun-cheng3;  XU Yan-ying1
1. College of Civil Aviation & safety engineering, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang? 110136, China
2. School of Chemical Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou? 450001, China
3. Nanjing University of Technology, Nanjing ?210009, China
关键词:
燃气系统泄漏; 严重性; 可拓评价; 事故后果; 应急救援响应
Keywords:
gas system leakage;  severity;  extensible assessment;  accident consequences;  emergency rescue response
分类号:
X913.4
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
燃气系统发生泄漏,如不能及时有效进行应急救援,极易引发严重的事故后果,因此,准确确定应急响应等级,进行有针对性的救援工作是控制燃气系统泄漏事故后果严重性的关键。从众多影响因素中,分析并确定了影响燃气系统泄漏事故后果严重性的主要因素,对各因素严重程度进行了等级划分。引入了可拓工程方法,建立了燃气系统泄漏事故后果严重性可拓综合评价模型,阐述了评价步骤和方法。当各影响因素分属不同等级时,根据所建模型能综合确定燃气系统泄漏事故后果严重性等级,依此进行事故应急救援分级响应。该方法能够克服人为评判失误,有利于指导有效事故救援,控制事故影响范围。运用该模型对一事故案例进行了计算,计算结果表明此方法用于确定应急救援响应等级是可行的。
Abstract:
Gas system leakage accident can easily lead to serious consequences of accident without timely and effective emergency response, therefore, the level of emergency rescue response can be determined accurately and targeted emergency rescue work are important to control the severity of the consequences of gas system leakage. Among the multiplex factors that affect the severity of gas leakage accident consequences, the major factors of the consequences severity about gas system leakage accident was analyzed and determined, severity level of each factor was determined. The assessment model for consequences severity of gas leakage accident was established using extenics engineering method, the assessment steps and method were also described. The severity level of the gas system leakage accident could be determined according to the model and method under the all factors belonging to different levels, and the emergency rescue response was classified. The method could overcome the human error, which was benefit to guide effective accident rescues, and control the cope of the accident quickly and accurately. An accident case was calculated with the extensible assessment model of consequence severity about gas system leakage accident and the results showed that the method was used to determine the level of emergency rescue response was feasible.

参考文献/References:

[1]武淑平,瞿怀远,宋守信.城市燃气系统应急能力评价指标体系的构建[J].燃气与热力,2009,29(4):47~49 WU Shu-ping, QU Huai-yuan, SONG Shou-xin. Establishment of assessment index system for emergency response capacity of city gas system [J].Gas & Heat.2009, 29(4):47~49[2]刘铁民,刘功智,陈胜.国家生产安全应急救援体系分级响应和救援程序探讨[J].中国安全科学学报,2003,13(12):5~8LIU Tie-min, LIU Gong-zhi, CHEN Sheng. Probe into response at different level and rescue procedure of national emergency response system for work safety [J].China Safety Science Journal, 2003, 13(12):5~8[3]蒋宏,周以良.城市燃气安全事故应急救援与城市安全应急系统[J].城市燃气,2006,371(1):18~20JIANG Hong, ZHOU Yi-liang. The system of city gas safety emergency rescue and urban safety [J].City Gas, 2006, 371(1):18~20[4]刘茂.应急救援概论——应急救援系统及计划[M].北京：化学工业出版社,2004.228~237LIU Mao. Introduction to emergency rescue- emergency rescue system and programs[M].Beijing：Chemical Industry Press, 2004, 228~237[5]吴宗之.重大事故应急救援系统及预案导论[M].冶金工业出版社,2003,5~8WU Zong-zhi. Introduction to major accident for emergency rescue system and plans [M]. Metallurgical Industry Press, 2003, 5~8[6]张柏成.城市应急联动系统建设与应用[M].北京：科学出版社,2005,3~16Zhang Bo-cheng. The construction and application of city emergency response system [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2005, 3~16[7]中华人民共和国国务院令第493号.生产安全事故报告和调查处理条例[Z].2007 PRC State Council Order No. 493. Production safety incident reporting, investigation and disposal regulations [Z] .2007[8]GB 6331-1986.企业职工伤亡事故分类[S] GB 6331-1986. Classification of workers casualty[S][9]王若菌,田宏.城镇民用管道燃气事故的危险性分析[A].陈宝智，李刚.（沈阳）国际安全科学与技术学术研讨会论文集[C].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,2006,245~249WANG Ruo-jun, TIAN Hong. Urban gas pipeline accident risk analysis [A]. Chen Bao-zhi, Li Gang. Proceedings of 2006(Shenyang) International colloquium on Safety Science and Technology [C]. Shenyang: Liaoning Science and Technology Press, 2006, 245~249[10]蔡文,杨春燕,林伟初.可拓工程方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2000CAI Wen, YANG Chun-yan, LIN Wei-chu. Extension Method [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2000[11]蔡文,杨春燕,何斌.可拓学基础理论研究的新进展[J].中国工程科学,2003,5(2):80~87CAI Wen, YANG Chun-yan, HE Bin. Extension of basic theoretical research new progress [J]. Engineering Science, 2003, 5(2):80~87

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2011-02-10
作者简介：王若菌，女，硕士，讲师，工程师。
更新日期/Last Update: