|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]吴昊.系统安全评价方法对比研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(6):209-30.
 WU Hao.Study on comparison of system safety assessment techniques[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2009,5(6):209-30.
点击复制

系统安全评价方法对比研究()
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
5
期数:
2009年6
页码:
209-30
栏目:
出版日期:
2009-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on comparison of system safety assessment techniques
文章编号:
1673-193X(2009)-06-0209-05
作者:
吴昊
中国安全生产科学研究院
Author(s):
WU Hao
China Academy of Safety Science & Technology
关键词:
安全评价方法安全评价方法的分析衡量风险
Keywords:
risk assessment techniques analysis of risk assessment techniques scale risk
分类号:
X913.4
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
安全评价是衡量风险,实现安全生产的重要途径。为了不同的评价目标开发出来的各种安全评价方法都有其针对性和局限性。认清这些方法的优点和缺点有助于系统地运用安全评价方法衡量目标的风险。安全评价软件有助于弥补安全评价方法的不足,并提高安全评价的效率和可靠性。
Abstract:
Risk assessment is a main pathway for risk evaluation and process safety. Each technique has been developed for a specific range of circumstances. Every technique has the advantages and disadvantages. To differentiate the advantages and disadvantages is useful to systematically use techniques to evaluate the risk. Integration of the techniques by software is helpful to improve the efficiency and reliability.

参考文献/References:

[1]刘铁民.安全评价实用指南[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2007LIU Tiemin. Guidebook of Risk Assessment Techniques[M]. Xuzhou:China University of Mining And Technology Press,2007[2]CIA 1993. A GUIDE TO HAZARD AND OPERABILITY STUDIES[R], Chemical Industries Association,1993.[3]Schlechter. PROCESS RISK ASSESSMENTUSING SCIENCE TO “DO IT RIGHT”[J]. W.Schlechter, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping,1995,v61,n23,479~494.[4]CCPS 1992, GUIDELINES FOR HAZARD EVALUATION PROCEDURES, SECOND EDITION[R]. Centre for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers,1992.[5]H.Ozag, L.M.Bendixen. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION AND QUANTIFICATION[J]. Chemical Engineering Progress,1987,v83,n4,55~64.[6]W.E.Vesely, F.F.Goldberg, N.H.Roberts, D.F.Haasl. FAULT TREE HANDBOOK[M]. Washington:U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,1981.[7]A.W.M.Balemans. CHECKLIST. GUIDE LINES FOR SAFE DESIGN OF PROCESS PLANTS[J]. 1st International Loss Prevention Symposium,1974,7~33.[8]J.L.Hawksley. RISK ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT[10]. The Safety Practitioner,1987,v5,n10,10~16.[9]多英全,魏利军,等.定量风险评价程序初探.中国科技信息,2007,(24):330~331.DUO Yingquan, WEI Lijun, et al. Quantitative Area Risk Assessment Method and its Application in Land Use Safety Planning for Major Hazard Installations[J]. China Science and Technology Information,2007,(24):330~331.[10]Faisal I K, Abbasi S A. Risk analysis of a typical chemical industry using QRA qrocedure[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.2001,(14):43~59[11]CASSTQRA V1.0. China Academy of Safety Science & Technology重大危险源区域定量风险评价软件V1.0.中国安全生产科学研究院.[12]P.Andow. GUIDANCE ON HAZOP PROCEDURES FOR COMPUTER CONTROLLED PLANTS[R], HSE contract research report, Her Majestys Stationary Office,1991,No.26[13]J.Lear. COMPUTER HAZARD AND OPERABILITY STUDIES[R], Safety and Reliability of Process Control Systems Symposium, Sydney University Chemical Engineering Association,19931006.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2009-10-20
更新日期/Last Update: