|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]刘勇锋,张超,马海涛.尾矿库漫顶溃决过程中溃口演化机理与坝体变形响应研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2026,22(4):29-36.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2026.04.004]
 LIU Yongfeng,ZHANG Chao,MA Haitao.Study on the breach evolution mechanism and dam body deformation response during overtopping failure of tailings pond[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2026,22(4):29-36.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2026.04.004]
点击复制

尾矿库漫顶溃决过程中溃口演化机理与坝体变形响应研究*

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
22
期数:
2026年4期
页码:
29-36
栏目:
安全工程技术
出版日期:
2026-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the breach evolution mechanism and dam body deformation response during overtopping failure of tailings pond
文章编号:
1673-193X(2026)-04-0029-08
作者:
刘勇锋张超马海涛
(1.重庆大学 资源与安全学院,重庆 400044;
2.深圳市中金岭南有色金属股份有限公司,广东 深圳 518042;
3.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所,湖北 武汉 430071;
4.中国安全生产科学研究院,北京 100012)
Author(s):
LIU Yongfeng ZHANG Chao MA Haitao
(1.School of Resources and Safety Engineering,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400044,China;
2.Shenzhen Zhongjin Lingnan Nonfemet Company Limited,Shenzhen Guangdong 518042,China;
3.Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Wuhan Hubei 430071,China;
4.China Academy of Safety Science and Technology,Beijng 100012,China)
关键词:
尾矿库漫顶溃决溃口演化物理模型试验变形响应
Keywords:
tailings pond overtopping failure breach evolution physical model test deformation response
分类号:
X936;TU43
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2026.04.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为揭示尾矿库漫顶溃决灾害机理,以广东省某头顶库为原型,基于弗汝德相似准则构建1∶12大比例尺物理模型,综合采用高速摄像、三维激光扫描、数字图像系统(DIC)和土压力传感器,全过程监测溃口演化与坝体响应。研究结果表明:溃决过程可分为下游坡面初始冲蚀、主冲槽剧烈下切、侧壁持续性淘刷、侧壁间歇性失稳坍塌和冲淤平衡5个阶段;溃口横向扩展受水流剪切与土体坍塌控制,纵向下切由水流冲刷与陡坎侵蚀主导,溃口宽度B与深度D呈强线性正相关(D=1.54B-0.20,决定系数R2=0.99);坝体应力响应高度局部化,溃口路径处压应力最大-6.10 kPa,拉应力最大+13.50 kPa;坝面变形表现为溃口边缘沉降最大(20.30 mm),土体存在向溃口中心的塑性流动及湿化膨胀现象。研究结果可揭示漫顶溃决的微观力学机制与耦合响应规律,并为为尾矿库安全预警与防控提供理论支撑。
Abstract:
In order to investigate the disaster mechanism of tailings pond overtopping failure,a 1∶12 large-scale physical model was constructed based on the Froude similarity criterion,using a top storage in Guangdong as the prototype.High-speed cameras,3D laser scanning,digital image correlation (DIC),and earth pressure sensors were comprehensively employed to monitor the breach evolution and dam response throughout the process.The results show that the overtopping failure process can be divided into five stages:initial erosion of the downstream slope,severe downcutting of the main scour channel,continuous sidewall scouring,intermittent instability and collapse of the sidewalls,and scour-siltation equilibrium.The transverse expansion of the breach is controlled by water flow shear erosion and soil collapse,while the vertical downcutting is dominated by water flow scouring and headcut erosion.A strong linear positive correlation is observed between breach width (B) and depth (D),expressed as D=1.54B-0.20,with a coefficient of determination R2=0.99.The stress response within the dam body is highly localized,with a maximum compressive stress of -6.10 kPa and a maximum tensile stress of +13.50 kPa along the breach path.The surface deformation of the dam is characterized by maximum settlement of 20.30 mm at the breach edge,accompanied by plastic flow of soil towards the breach center and wetting-induced expansion.The findings reveal the micromechanical mechanisms and coupled response patterns of overtopping failure,and provide theoretical support for early warning and prevention of tailings pond disasters.

参考文献/References:

[1]国家安全生产监督管理总局.国家安全监管总局关于印发《遏制尾矿库“头顶库”重特大事故工作方案》的通知[EB/OL].(2026-05-20)[2026-03-30].https://www.mempe.org.cn/gongwengonggao/show-19938.html.
[2]赵天龙,陈生水,钟启明.尾矿坝溃决机理与溃坝过程研究进展[J].水利水运工程学报,2015,1(7):105-111. ZHAO Tianlong,CHEN Shengshui,ZHONG Qiming.Advances in studies of tailing dam break mechanism and process[J].Hydro-Science and Engineering,2015,1(7):105-111.
[3]杨春和,张超,李全明,等.大型高尾矿坝灾变机制与防控方法[J].岩土力学,2021,42(1)1-17. YANG Chunhe,ZHANG Chao,LI Quanming,et al.Disaster mechanism and prevention methods of large-scale high tailings dam[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2021,42(1)1-17.
[4]KOSSOFF D,DUBBIN WE,ALFREDSSON M,et al.Mine tailings dams:characteristics,failure,environmental impacts,and remediation[J].Applied Geochemistry,2014,51:229-245.
[5]王昆,杨鹏,KAREN H E,等.尾矿库溃坝灾害防控现状及发展[J].工程科学学报,2018,40(5):526-539. WANG Kun,YANG Peng,KAREN H E,et al.Status and development for the prevention and management of tailings dam failure accidents[J].Chinese Journal of Engineering,2018,40(5):526-539.
[6]李全明,王云海,张兴凯,等.尾矿库溃坝灾害因素分析及风险指标体系研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2008,4(3):50-53. LI Quanming,WANG Yunhai,ZHANG Xingkai,et al.Analysis of disastrous factors concerning tailing dam failing and research on risk index system[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2008,4(3):50-53.
[7]赵怀刚,王光进,张超,等.尾矿库溃坝泥石流运动过程试验研究[J].泥沙研究,2019,44(1):31-37. ZHAO Huaigang,WANG Guangjin,ZHANG Chao,et al.Experimental study on processes of debris flow after tailings dam failure[J].Journal of Sediment Research,2019,44(1):31-37.
[8]尹光志,敬小非,魏作安,等.尾矿坝溃坝相似模拟试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(增刊2):3830-3838. YIN Guangzhi,JING Xiaofei,WEI Zuoan,et al.Experimental study of similar simulation of tailings dam-break[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2010,29(Supplement 2):3830-3838.
[9]FREDLUND D G,XING A,FREDLUND M D,et al.The relationship of the unsaturated soil shear strength to the soil-water characteristic curve[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1996,33(3):440-448.
[10]曹帅,张红武,赵晨苏,等.变坝坡赤泥库漫顶溃坝模型试验研究[J].水利学报,2019,50(4):428-438. CAO Shuai,ZHANG Hongwu,ZHAO Chensu,et al.Experimental study on dam-break of a red mud reservoir with complex dam slopes[J].Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2019,50(4):428-438.
[11]NEGAR G, DANIEL A M, NAHYAN M,et al .Analysis of uncertainty and sensitivity in tailings dam breach-runout numerical modelling[J].Mine Water and the Environment,2024,43:87-103.
[12]朱远乐,赵新勇,王淇萱.基于PFC3D的灰岭尾矿库溃坝三维数值模拟研究[J].水电能源科学,2023,8(4):94-97. ZHU Yuanle,ZHAO Xinyong,WANG Qixuan.Research on Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dam break of huiling tailings pond based on PFC3D[J].Water Resources and Power,2023,8(4):94-97.
[13]WANG G J,ZHAO B,LAN R,et al.Experimental study on failure model of tailings dam overtopping under heavy rainfall[J],Lithosphere,2022(10):5922501.
[14]YAO C,WU L,YANG J,et al.Influences of tailings particle size on overtopping tailings dam failures[J].Water,2019,11(11):2256.
[15]WU T,QIN J.Experimental study of a tailings impoundment dam failure due to overtopping[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2018,2(9):272-280.
[16]YANG M,ZHONG Q M,LIN Z,et al.Model tests and numerical simulation of overtopping-induced breach process of the asphalt concrete core dam[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2024,46(7):1534-1540.
[17]RICO M,BENITO G,SALGUEIRO A R,et al.Reported tailings dam failures:a review of the European incidents in the worldwide context[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials,2008,152(2):846-852.
[18]刘勇锋,张超.基于多源传感监测的大型尾矿库溃坝物理模拟及冲击影响研究[J].河南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2025,44(6):64-74. LIU Yongfeng,ZHANG Chao.Physical simulation and impact analysis of large-scale tailings dam reach based on multi-dource densing monitoring[J].Journal of Henan Polytechnic University (Natural Science), 2025,44(6):64-74.
[19]杨柳,王金安,黎伟佳.基于CFD-DEM耦合的尾矿库溃坝数值模拟[J].金属矿山,2022(8):219-227. YANG Liu,WANG Jin’an,LI Weijia.Numerical simulation of tailings pond dam break based on CFD-DEM method[J].Metal Mine,2022(8):219-227.
[20]FREAD D L.BREACH,an erosion model for earthen dam failures [D].Silver Spring:Hydrologic Research Laboratory,National Weather Service,NOAA,1988.
[21]ZHONG Q,WANG L,CHEN S,et al.Breaches of embankment and landslide dams-state of the art review[J].Earth-Science Reviews,2021,216:103597.

相似文献/References:

[1]李全明,田文旗,王云海,等.尾矿库在线监测系统中位移数据分析方法探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(8):47.
 LI Quan-ming,TIAN Wen-qi,WANG Yun-hai.Study on displacement analysis methods of tailing ponds on-line monitoring system[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2011,7(4):47.
[2]许元木.浅谈尾矿坝削坡[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(11):132.
 XU Yuan-mu.A superficial analysis on tailings dam cutting slope[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2011,7(4):132.
[3]梅国栋,吴宗之.尾矿库溃坝风险定量评价方法探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(2):78.
 MEI Guo dong,WU Zong zhi.Discussion on quantitative assessment method of dam failure risks in tailings dam[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2012,8(4):78.
[4]孙恩吉,张兴凯,李仲学,等.降雨条件下尾矿坝饱和-半饱和渗流模拟分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(3):5.
 SUN En ji,ZHANG Xing kai,LI Zhong xue,et al.Simulation analysis on tailings dam saturated and semisaturation infiltration of under rainfall conditions[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2012,8(4):5.
[5]李钢.基于灰色系统理论的尾矿库坝体 形变位移预测方法[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(4):107.
 LI Gang.Research on the displacement forecasting methods of tailings dam deformation based on the gray system theory[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2012,8(4):107.
[6]梅国栋.尾矿库溃坝灾害脆弱性评估指标体系及方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(12):11.
 MEI Guo dong.Research on the dambreak hazard vulnerability assessment index system and methods of tailings pond[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2012,8(4):11.
[7]蔡嗣经,张栋,吴宗之.尾矿库地震溃坝模糊风险评估方法探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):10.
 CAI Shi Jing,ZHANG Dong,WU Zong Zhi.Discussion on Tailings Reservoir Dam fuzzy risk assessment model Under Seismic Conditions[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2011,7(4):10.
[8]张栋,吴宗之,蔡嗣经.尾矿库地震液化机理及抗震评估指标体系研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(6):17.
 ZHANG Dong,WU Zong-zhi,CAI Shi-jing.Discussion on tailings reservoir dam failure risk assessment index system under seismic conditions[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2010,6(4):17.
[9]梅国栋,王云海.我国尾矿库事故统计分析与对策研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(3):211.
 MEI Guo-dong,WANG Yun-hai.Statistic analysis and countermeasure study on tailings pond accidents in China[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2010,6(4):211.
[10]郭朝阳,唐治亚.尾矿库溃坝模型探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(1):63.
 GUO Chao-yang,TANG Zhi-ya.Study on the tailings dam-break model[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2010,6(4):63.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2025-10-12
* 基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFC3012200)
作者简介: 刘勇锋,博士研究生,高级工程师,主要研究方向为非煤矿山动力灾害防治。
通信作者: 张超,博士,研究员,主要研究方向为矿山岩土工程灾害与防控技术。
更新日期/Last Update: 2026-04-29