|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]牛莉霞,杨简祎.智能矿山人机适配如何影响心理安全感*——基于工作重塑视角[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2026,22(3):162-170.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2026.03.021]
　NIU Lixia,YANG Jianyi.The impact of human-machine compatibility in smart mines on psychological safety: a job crafting perspective[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2026,22(3):162-170.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2026.03.021]
点击复制

智能矿山人机适配如何影响心理安全感*——基于工作重塑视角

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
22
期数:
2026年3期
页码:
162-170
栏目:
职业健康与防护
出版日期:
2026-03-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
The impact of human-machine compatibility in smart mines on psychological safety: a job crafting perspective
文章编号:
1673-193X(2026)-03-0162-09
作者:
牛莉霞; 杨简祎
（辽宁工程技术大学 工商管理学院，辽宁 葫芦岛 125000）
Author(s):
NIU Lixia;  YANG Jianyi
（College of Business Administration,Liaoning Technical University,Huludao Liaoning 125000,China）
关键词:
人机适配;  工作重塑;  心理安全感;  安全氛围;  风险感知
Keywords:
human-machine fit;  job crafting;  psychological safety;  safety climate;  risk perception
分类号:
X912.9
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2026.03.021
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为揭示智能矿山“人机协同”背景下矿工心理安全感的形成机制，探讨技术适配与个体行为的交互作用。基于任务-技术匹配理论（TTF）与工作特性理论（JCT），提出“人机适配-工作重塑-心理安全感”的双维驱动模型，将安全氛围与风险感知纳入调节框架，并以307名智能矿山一线矿工的问卷数据为样本进行实证检验。研究结果表明：人机适配对矿工心理安全感具有显著正向影响，这一作用通过任务适配性与个人适配性双路径实现。其中，工作重塑起到中介作用，通过任务重塑、技能重塑和关系重塑3条关键路径共同提升矿工心理安全感；此外，安全氛围正向调节任务适配性对任务重塑和关系重塑的路径，风险感知则负向调节个人适配性对技能重塑的路径。研究结果可为智能矿山技术部署中增强矿工安全感、优化人机协作设计提供理论支撑依据与实践参考。
Abstract:
In order to reveal how miners’ psychological safety is formed in the context of human-machine collaboration in smart mines,this study examines the interactive effects between technology fit and individual behavior.Building on task-technology fit (TTF) theory and job characteristics theory (JCT),it proposes a two-dimensional dual-driver model that links human-machine fit,job crafting,and psychological safety,and further incorporates safety climate and risk perception as moderators.The model is empirically tested using questionnaire data collected from 307 frontline miners in smart mines.The results show that human-machine fit has a significant positive effect on miners’ psychological safety,and this effect operates through two routes,namely task fit and individual fit.Job crafting plays a mediating role and improves psychological safety through three key paths,which involve task crafting,skill crafting,and relational crafting.Moreover,safety climate positively moderates the effects of task fit on task crafting and relational crafting,whereas risk perception negatively moderates the effect of individual fit on skill crafting.These findings provide theoretical and practical implications for strengthening miners’ psychological safety during smart-mine technology deployment and for improving the design of human-machine collaboration,which supports coordinated progress in safety investment and personnel acceptance.

参考文献/References:

［1］KOLAPO P,OGUNSOLA N O,KOMOLAFE K,et al.Envisioning human-machine relationship towards mining of the future:an overview［J］.Mining,2025,5(1):5.
［2］GOVEIA-ASSAFRAO J,MARNEWICK A L,MATIVENGA P T.A review of the impacts of human-machine cooperation on optimized resource extraction in the mining industry［J］.Procedia CIRP,2025,134556-134561.
［3］高耀远,张磊.智能建造人机交互场景下专业劳动实践能力提升路径研究［J］.经济师,2025(8):231-232,237.
［4］EDMONDSON A C.Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams［J］.Administrative Science Quarterly,1999,44(2):350-383.
［5］ZHU A,WANG Q,LIU H,et al.Correlational analysis of occupational accidents and the safety policies in the Chinese coal mining industry from 2008 to 2021［J］.Scientific Reports,2024,14(1):3748.
［6］HAO J,LI Y,CHEN X,et al.Associated factors of anxiety and depressive symptoms among coal miners in Shanxi,China:a cross-sectional study［J］.BMC Public Health,2025,25(1):2838.
［7］LYNAS D,HORBERRY T.Human factor issues with automated mining equipment［J］.The Ergonomics Open Journal,2011,4(Suppl 2-M3):74-80.
［8］HAAS E J.Applying the precaution adoption process model to the acceptance of mine safety and health technologies［J］.Occupational Health Science,2018,2(1):43-66.
［9］SWANSON L R,BELLANCA J L,HELTON J.Automated systems and trust:mine workers’ trust in proximity detection systems for mobile machines［J］.Safety and Health at Work,2019,10(4):461-469.
［10］WRZESNIEWSKI A,DUTTON J E.Crafting a job:revisioning employees as active crafters of their work［J］.Academy of Management Review,2001,26(2):179-201.
［11］ZOHAR D.Safety climate in industrial organizations:theoretical and applied implications［J］.Journal of Applied Psychology,1980,65(1):96-102.
［12］SLOVIC P.Perception of risk［J］.Science,1987,236(4799):280-285.
［13］HACKMAN J R,OLDHAM G R.Motivation through the design of work:test of a theory［J］.Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,1976,16(2):250-279.
［14］GOODHUE D L.Understanding user evaluations of information systems［J］.Management Science,1995,41(12):1827-1844.
［15］彭伟,韩丽娟,乐婷,等.心理资本对员工不安全行为的影响机制研究——一个有调节的链式中介模型［J］.财经论丛（浙江财经学院学报）,2024(9):103-112. PENG Wei,HAN Lijuan,YUE Ting,et al.Study on the mechanism of psychological capital influencing employees’unsafe behavior:a moderated chain mediation model［J］.Collected Essays on Finance and Economics,2024(9):103-112.
［16］王璟.矿工安全心理资本与不安全行为的关系研究［D］.西安:西安科技大学,2016.
［17］ZIGURS I,BUCKLAND B K.A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness［J］.MIS Quarterly,1998,22 (3):313-334.
［18］胡睿玲,田喜洲.重构工作身份与意义——工作重塑研究述评［J］.外国经济与管理,2015,37(10):69-81. HU Ruiling,TIAN Xizhou.Crafting work identity and meaning:a literature of job crafting research［J］.Foreign Economics & Management,2015,37(10):69-81.
［19］李乃文,张丽,牛莉霞.工作压力、安全注意力与不安全行为的影响机理模型［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(6):14-19. LI Naiwen,ZHANG Li,NIU Lixia.Influencing mechanism model of work stress,safety attention and unsafe behavior［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2017,13(6):14-19.
［20］仰奉君.人工智能技术应用对员工前瞻行为双刃剑效应研究［D］.兰州:兰州财经大学,2025.
［21］徐子文,申海波.工作使命感对员工工作重塑的影响机制［J］.企业科技与发展,2025(4):66-72.
［22］马璐,李思柔.人工智能焦虑与新生代员工创新行为：组织依恋及工作重塑的作用［J］.科技进步与对策,2025,42(1):132-140. MA Lu,LI Sirou.Artificial intelligence anxiety and innovative behavior of new generation employees:the roles of organizational attachment and job crafting［J］.Science & Technology Progress and Policy,2025,42(1):132-140.
［23］OLDHAM G R,HACKMAN J R.Not what it was and not what it will be:the future of job design research［J］.Journal of Organizational Behavior,2010,31(2-3):463-479.
［24］胡晓菲.创意劳动的数字化重塑：任务、技能、关系［J］.中国劳动关系学院学报,2025,39(2):101-112. HU Xiaofei.On the digital restructuring of creative labor:Its work tasks,skills,and relationships［J］.Journal of China University of Labor Relations,2025,39(2):101-112.
［25］牛莉霞,杜瑞欣,夏文德.作业场所安全标志、风险感知与安全注意力关系［J］.安全与环境学报,2024,24(4):1495-1504. NIU Lixia,DU Ruixin,XIA Wende.Relationship between workplace safety signs,risk perception and safety attention［J］.Journal of Safety and Environment,2024,24(4):1495-1504.
［26］SITKIN S B,WEINGART L R.Determinants of risky decision-making behavior:a test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity［J］.Academy of Management Journal,1995,38(6):1573-1592.
［27］TIMS M,BAKKER A B.Job crafting:towards a new model of individual job redesign［J］.SA Journal of Industrial Psychology,2010,36(2):1-9.
［28］李召敏,赵曙明.劳资关系氛围五维度对员工心理安全和工作嵌入的影响——基于中国广东和山东两地民营企业的实证研究［J］.管理评论,2017,29(4):108-121. LI Zhaomin,ZHAO Shuming.The effect of five-dimensional industrial relations climate on employees’ psychological safety and job embeddedness——an empirical study of private enterprises in Guangdong and Shandong regions of China［J］.Management Review,2017,29(4):108-121.
［29］LYU X,ZHAO B,YANG T,ZHAO L.The development and validation of the Chinese safety climate scale using the item-response theory approach［J］.Frontiers in Psychology,2023,14:1119928.
［30］李广利.矿工风险感知、安全注意力与安全行为的关系研究［D］.西安:西安科技大学,2018.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2025-10-10
* 基金项目： 国家自然科学基金面上项目（52174184）；辽宁省教育厅基本科研项目（LJ212510147042）
作者简介： 牛莉霞，博士，教授，主要研究方向为安全组织管理、组织行为学、人因工程。
通信作者： 杨简祎，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为人力资源管理与组织行为学。
更新日期/Last Update: 2026-03-31