|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]郑明新,卢乐意,李东,等.基于改进灰色关联投影模型的滑坡治理方案决策研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2025,21(5):102-110.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2025.05.013]
 ZHENG Mingxin,LU Leyi,LI Dong,et al.Research on decision-making of landslide treatment scheme based on improved grey relational projection model[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2025,21(5):102-110.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2025.05.013]
点击复制

基于改进灰色关联投影模型的滑坡治理方案决策研究*

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
21
期数:
2025年5期
页码:
102-110
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2025-05-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on decision-making of landslide treatment scheme based on improved grey relational projection model
文章编号:
1673-193X(2025)-05-0102-09
作者:
郑明新卢乐意李东阮钰华
(1.华东交通大学 交通运输工程学院,江西 南昌 330013;
2.华东交通大学 轨道交通基础设施性能监测与保障国家重点实验室,江西 南昌 330013)
Author(s):
ZHENG Mingxin LU Leyi LI Dong RUAN Yuhua
(1.College of Communication and Transportation Engineering,East China Jiaotong University,Nanchang Jiangxi 330013,China;
2.State Key Laboratory of Performance Monitoring and Protecting of Rail Transit Infrastructure,East China Jiaotong University,Nanchang Jiangxi 330013,China)
关键词:
滑坡治理方案决策组合赋权分辨系数灰色关联投影法
Keywords:
landslide treatment scheme decision-making combined weighting discrimination coefficient grey relational projection method
分类号:
X913
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2025.05.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为解决滑坡治理方案决策的多维复杂性问题,提出1种融合组合赋权与动态分辨系数的改进灰色关联投影模型。首先,构建包含滑坡地质特征认识、滑坡治理措施、经济与环境4大因素的16项决策指标,并通过分级标准实现指标定量化。然后,采用层次分析法(AHP)和CRITIC分别确定主观和客观权重,基于博弈论组合赋权计算综合权重。进一步引入动态分辨系数,优化传统灰色关联投影法,提升指标区分度,最终建立滑坡治理方案决策模型。研究结果表明:改进模型具有较高的决策适用性和稳定性,稳定性提升约13.01%,优于传统模型。研究结果可为工程实践中合理选择治理措施提供更加精准的决策支持。
Abstract:
In order to solve the problem of multi-dimensional complexity in the decision-making of landslide treatment scheme,an improved grey relational projection model integrating the combined weighting and dynamic discrimination coefficient was proposed.Firstly,a total of 16 decision-making indexes including four factors of landslide geological characteristics cognition,landslide treatment measures,economy and environment were constructed,and the indexes were quantified by the grading standards.Secondly,the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and CRITIC were used to determine the subjective and objective weights respectively,and the comprehensive weight was calculated based on the combined weighting of game theory.Furthermore,the dynamic discrimination coefficient was introduced to optimize the traditional grey relational projection method and improve the index discrimination.Finally,a decision-making model of landslide treatment scheme was established.The results show that the improved model has higher decision applicability and stability,and the stability is improved by about 13.01%,which is better than the traditional model.The research results can provide more accurate decision-making support for the reasonable selection of treatment measures in engineering practice.

参考文献/References:

[1]王建智,侯恩科,杨更社,等.陕南山区滑坡灾害防治关键技术研究[EB/OL].(2013-03-11)[2025-01-23].https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=-Y4qPNLDuvZI_D-grjxiHf8a4BwEEIhNSSyYWt3BD7eTpRBbEjxKjyMtPm52qUhGnSaVi8G1yVKu-DrYcCJEVrda2rJC1_tgQIzveGcTxzEdpWfvPIIpcuaNmanfvk1kzIPwNHzhXtbeb3tuOjfc7pmexLHiTc3lS0ipl48Cc4p91czvsrtYRw==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS.
[2]叶为民,孔令伟,胡瑞林,等.膨胀土滑坡与工程边坡新型治理技术与工程示范研究 [J].岩土工程学报,2022,44(7):1295-1309. YE Weimin,KONG Lingwei,HU Ruilin,et al.New prevention and treatment techniques and their applications to landslides and engineering slopes of expansive soils[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2022,44(7):1295-1309.
[3]丁瑞瑞.微型桩加固浅层堆积层滑坡的技术经济评价研究[D].西安:西安工业大学,2016.
[4]PENG M.Study on optimal evaluation model of comprehensive treatment scheme for loess landslide[J].IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science,2019,242(5):052048.
[5]TIAN G S,GUO Z K,LI S X,et al.Optimization of tawa landslide treatment scheme based on the AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J].IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science,2020,598(1):012-032.
[6]ZHANG H,WANG J.Decision-making model for landslide prevention based on improved grey relational analysis [J].Geotechnical Testing Journal,2021,44(3):362-373.
[7]邵泳翔.堆积层滑坡设计的技术经济评价[D].西安:西安工业大学,2017.
[8]曾凯.基于层次分析-灰色关联法的低碳施工方案比选研究[D].长沙:长沙理工大学,2018.
[9]方前程,商丽.基于博弈论-云模型的露天矿岩质边坡稳定性分析[J].安全与环境学报,2019,19(1):8-13. FANG Qiancheng,SHANG Li.Stability analysis of rock slope in open-pit mine based on game theory-cloud modeling[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2019,19(1):8-13.
[10]李鹏翔.堆积层滑坡微型桩组合结构加固的技术经济研究[D].西安:西安工业大学,2023.
[11]向芸辛.三峡库区顺层岩质滑坡治理效果综合评价[D].重庆:重庆三峡学院,2023.
[12]宋军,尉壮岩,程英建,等.滑坡灾害治理工程效果评价方法初探 [J].钻探工程,2017,44(4):80-84. SONG Jun,YU Zhuangyan,CHENG Yingjian,et al.Study on evaluation approach to the effect of landslide hazards prevention and control engineering [J].Drilling Engineering,2017,44(4):80-84.
[13]黄健,巨能攀.滑坡治理工程效果评估方法研究 [J].工程地质学报,2012,20(2):189-194. HUANG Jian,JU Nengpan.Evaluation approach of counter measure efficiency for landslide hazards[J].Journal of Engineering Geology,2012,20(2):189-194.
[14]覃事河,周全,段斌,等.大渡河林邦滑坡体工程治理措施及效果评价 [J].人民长江,2023,54(增刊1):77-81,93. QIN Shihe,ZHOU Quan,DUAN Bin,et al.Evaluation of management measures and effects of the Dadu River Limbang landslide project[J].Yangtze River,2023,54(Supplement 1):77-81,93.
[15]郑明新,殷宗泽,吴继敏,等.滑坡治理工程效果的模糊综合后评价研究[J].岩土工程学报,2006(10):1224-1229. ZHENG Mingxin,YIN Zongze,WU Jimin,et al.Post-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of effectiveness of landslide control[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2006(10):1224-1229.
[16]陈为公,张悦,张娜,等.基于改进灰色关联投影法的既有建筑节能改造方案选择 [J].沈阳大学学报(自然科学版),2022,34(4):306-313. CHEN Weigong,ZHANG Yue,ZHANG Na,et al.Selection of energy saving retrofit programs for existing buildings based on improved gray correlation projection methods[J].Journal of Shenyang University(Natural Science),2022,34(4):306-313.
[17]郑明新,杨婧雯.基于AHP-CRITIC与TOPSIS的路基下穿高铁桥梁施工工法评价 [J].安全与环境学报,2023,23(8):2563-2571. ZHENG Mingxin,YANG Jingwen.Evaluation of construction methods for roadbed underpassing high speed rail bridge based on AHP-CRITIC and TOPSIS[J].Journal of Safety and Environment,2023,23(8):2563-2571.
[18]张建明,侍克斌,巴合特别克·达拉依汗,等.基于改进博弈论组合赋权的引水隧洞TBM掘进效能评价模型[J/OL].武汉大学学报(工学版),1-14[2025-01-29].https://kns-cnki-net.webvpn.cueb.edu.cn/kcms/detail/42.1675.T.20240307.1154.004.html.
[19]刘至伟.大型牵引式土质滑坡灾变机制与治理措施研究[D].抚州:东华理工大学,2021.

相似文献/References:

[1]曹兰柱,赵立春,王东,等.含多弱层复合边坡滑坡治理三维数值分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(6):102.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.06.016]
 CAO La-zhu,ZHAO Li-chun,WANG Dong,et al.Three-dimensional numerical analysis on landslide control of composite slope with multiple weak layers[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2015,11(5):102.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.06.016]
[2]王飞,马裕超,张辉,等.基于区间概率优势决策模型的滑坡治理方案优选研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(8):88.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.08.014]
 WANG Fei,MA Yuchao,ZHANG Hui,et al.Research on optimization of landslide control scheme based on interval probability dominance decisionmaking model[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2019,15(5):88.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.08.014]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2024-11-08
* 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(51568022);江西省科技专项资金项目(20242BAB26078)
作者简介: 郑明新,博士,教授,主要研究方向为滑坡与路基病害防治方案评价分析。
通信作者: 卢乐意,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为铁路临线滑坡治理方案评价分析。
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-05-26