|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李琰,张嘉乐.基于多时段QCA的煤矿事故致因演变规律研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2024,20(10):88-93.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.10.012]
　LI Yan,ZHANG Jiale.Study on evolution laws of coal mine accident causations based on multi-temporal QCA[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2024,20(10):88-93.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.10.012]
点击复制

基于多时段QCA的煤矿事故致因演变规律研究*
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
20
期数:
2024年10期
页码:
88-93
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2024-10-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on evolution laws of coal mine accident causations based on multi-temporal QCA
文章编号:
1673-193X(2024)-10-0088-06
作者:
李琰; 张嘉乐
(西安科技大学 管理学院，陕西 西安 710054)
Author(s):
LI Yan;  ZHANG Jiale
(College of Management,Xi’an University of Science and Technology,Xi’an Shaanxi 710054,China)
关键词:
煤矿事故; TOE框架; mtQCA; 组态路径; 演变分析; 致因分析
Keywords:
coal mine accident;  technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework;  multi-temporal qualitative comparative analysis (mtQCA);  configuration path;  evolutionary analysis;  causal analysis
分类号:
X936
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.10.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了防范和减少煤矿事故，保障能源安全，本文以2001—2010年和2011—2020年各40起典型煤矿事故为研究对象，基于TOE框架构建技术、组织和环境三个层面的事故致因表，运用多时段定性比较分析方法（mtQCA）进行组态分析，探究两阶段煤矿事故的致因路径和演变规律。研究结果表明：阶段一和阶段二分别存在着6条和4条组态路径，并可以聚类归纳为4种事故类型：技术主导型、组织管理主导型、环境主导型和技术-组织联动型；组织管理问题仍是煤矿安全事故的主要原因，特别是违规行为和监管不力；在多时段比较分析中,存在多重轨迹演化的现象，技术-组织联动型和环境主导型的变化轨迹是“转折轨迹”，技术主导型和组织管理主导型的变化轨迹是“主导轨迹”。最后，针对事故的不同类型和演变规律，提出预防与应对措施，可为提高煤矿安全生产管理水平提供参考。
Abstract:
In order to prevent and reduce the coal mine accidents and guarantee the energy safety,40 typical coal mine accidents in each of the years 2001—2010 and 2011—2020 were taken as the research objects,and the accident causation table at the technical,organizational and environmental levels was constructed based on the TOE framework.The configuration analysis was carried out by applying the method of multitemporal qualitative comparative analysis (mtQCA),and the causation paths and evolution laws of coal mine accidents in the two stages were explored.The results show that there are six and four configuration paths in stage 1 and stage 2,respectively,which are clustered into four types of accidents: technology-dominated type,organizational management-dominated type,environment-dominated type,and technology-organizational linkage.The organizational management problems are still the main cause of coal mine safety accidents,especially the violation behavior and poor supervision.In the multi-temporal comparative analysis,the phenomenon of multiple trajectory evolution is found.The change trajectories of technology-organization linkage type and the environment-dominated type are the “turning trajectory”,and the change trajectories of technology-dominated type and the organizational management-dominated type are the “dominant trajectory”.Finally,the prevention and response measures are proposed for the different types of accidents and their evolution laws,which can provide reference for improving the work safety management level of coal mines.

参考文献/References:

［1］张培森,李复兴,朱慧聪,等.2008—2020年煤矿事故统计分析及防范对策［J］.矿业安全与环保,2022,49(1):128-134. ZHANG Peisen,LI Fuxing,ZHU Huicong,et al.Statistical analysis and prevention countermeasures of coal mine accidents from 2008 to 2020 ［J］.Mining Safety & Environmental Protection,2022,49(1):128-134.
［2］吴金刚,毛俊睿,柴沛.2000—2017年我国煤矿重特大水灾事故规律分析［J］.煤矿安全,2019,50(10):239-242，247. WU Jin’gang,MAO Junrui,CHAI Pei.Law of Major & Particular Major Coal Mine Flooding Accidents in China from 2000 to 2017［J］.Safety in Coal Mines,2019,50(10):239-242，247.
［3］张培森,朱慧聪,李复兴,等.2008—2019年我国煤矿水害事故统计及演变趋势分析［J］.煤矿安全,2021,52(8):194-200,207. ZHANG Peisen,ZHU Huicong,LI Fuxing,et al.Evolution trend and statistical analysis of coal mine water disaster accidents in China from 2008 to 2019［J］.Safety in Coal Mines,2021,52(8):194-200,207.
［4］田水承,周鹏辉.基于文本挖掘的煤矿顶板事故致因网络分析［J］.煤炭技术,2023,42(2):117-121. TIAN Shuicheng,ZHOU Penghui.Network Analysis of Coal Mine Roof Accident Causation Based on Text Mining［J］.Coal Technology,2023,42(2):117-121.
［5］柳茹林,程卫民,于岩斌,等.基于HFACS-MI改进模型的煤矿重特大事故人因分析［J］.煤矿安全,2017,48(8):250-253. LIU Rulin,CHENG Weimin,YU Yanbin,et al.Human Factors Analysis of Coal Mine Major Accidents Based on Improved HFACS-MI Model［J］.Safety in Coal Mines,2017,48(8):250-253.
［6］CHEN H,QI H,LONG R,et al.Research on 10-year tendency of China coal mine accidents and the characte-ristics of human factors［J］.Safety Science,2012,50(4):745-750.
［7］袁晓芳,朱明杰.煤矿人因事故影响因素与组态路径分析［J］.煤矿安全,2022,53(3):245-250. YUAN Xiaofang,ZHU Mingjie.Analysis on influencing factors and configuration paths of human-caused accidents in coal mines［J］.Safety in Coal Mines,2022,53(3):245-250.
［8］李红霞,徐浩冉,田水承.组态视角下煤矿事故恶化路径的清晰集定性比较分析［J］.西安科技大学学报,2023,43(2):247-254. LI Hongxia,XU Haoran,TIAN Shuicheng.A crispsetqualitative comparative analysis of deteriorating path of coal mine accidents from the configuration perspec-tive［J］.Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology,2023,43(2):247-254.
［9］杜运周,马鸿佳.复杂性背景下的创新创业研究：基于QCA方法［J］.研究与发展管理,2022,34(3):1-9. DU Yunzhou,MA Hongjia.Research on Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the Context of Complexity:Based on a QCA Approach［J］.R&D MANAGEMENT,2022,34(3):1-9.
［10］杜运周,李佳馨,刘秋辰,等.复杂动态视角下的组态理论与QCA方法:研究进展与未来方向［J］.管理世界,2021,37(3):180-197,12-13. DU Yunzhou,LI Jiaxin,LIU Qiuchen,et al.Configuration Theory and QCA Methods from the Perspective of Complex Dynamics:Research Progress and Future Directions［J］.Journal of Management World,2021,37(3):180-197,12-13.
［11］VIS B.,WOLDENDORP J.and KEMAN H.Examining Variation in Economic Performance Using Fuzzy-sets［J］.Quality & Quantity:International Journal of Methodology,2013,47(4):1971-1989.
［12］孙佩红,刘凯月.战略性新兴企业高质量发展组态研究:基于TOE拓展框架的fsQCA分析［J］.西部论坛,2022,32(5):12-25. SUN Peihong,LIU Kaiyue.High-quality Developmentof Strategic Emerging Enterprises:fsQCA Analysis Based on TOE Extension Framework.［J］.West Forum,2022,32(5):12-25.
［13］章文光,王耀辉.哪些因素影响了产业升级?——基于定性比较分析方法的研究［J］.北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2018(1):132-142. ZHANG Wenguang,WANG Yaohui.What factors affect industrial upgrading?——research based on qualitative comparative analysis methods［J］.Journal of Beijing Normal University,2018(1):132-142.
［14］JIANG W,LIANG C,HAN W.Relevance proof of safety culture in coal mine industry［J］.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,2019,16(5):835.
［15］YANG X,XING Q,TIAN K,et al.Using the ISM-ANP-SD combination model to explore the mechanism and intervention strategies of influencing factors of coal mine safety system［J］.Frontiers In Public Health,2022,10:1053298.
［16］LITRICO,DAVID R J.The evolution of issue interpretation within organizational fields:actor positions,framing trajectories,and field settlement［J］.Academy of Management Journal,2017,60(3):986-1015.

相似文献/References:

[1]朱庆明,张浩.三次指数平滑法在煤矿事故预测中的应用研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(4):103.
　ZHU Qing ming,ZHANG Hao.Study on the application of cubic exponential smoothing method in coal mine accidents forecasting[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(10):103.
[2]张东,聂百胜,王龙康.我国煤矿安全生产事故的致灾因素分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(5):136.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.05.026]
　ZHANG Dong,NIE Bai sheng,WANG Long kang.Investigation a disastercausing factors of coal mine accidents in China[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(10):136.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.05.026]
[3]武晓旭,龚孔成,贾明涛.煤矿事故预测的指数平滑—BP神经网络混合模型研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(9):165.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.09.028]
　WU Xiao-xu,GONG Kong-cheng,JIA Ming-tao.Research on mixed model of exponential smoothing method and BP neural network for accidents forecasting in coal mine[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(10):165.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.09.028]
[4]兰建义,乔美英,周英.基于灰色系统理论的煤矿人因事故关键因素分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(2):178.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.02.029]
　LAN Jian-yi,QIAO Mei-ying,ZHOU Ying.Analysis on critical factor of human error accidents in coal mine based on gray system theory[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(10):178.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.02.029]
[5]王娟,戴凤威,方博.煤矿事故应急响应的风险决策研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(6):21.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.06.003]
　WANG Juan,DAI Fengwei,FANG Bo.Research on risk decisionmaking of emergency response to coal mine accidents[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(10):21.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.06.003]
[6]江耀森,杨超宇,刘晓蕾.基于ChatGLM3-6B的煤矿事故知识图谱构建及应用研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2024,20(10):12.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.10.002]
　JIANG Yaosen,YANG Chaoyu,LIU Xiaolei.Research on construction and application of knowledge graph for coal mine accidents based on ChatGLM3-6B[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2024,20(10):12.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.10.002]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2024-01-03
* 基金项目： 国家自然科学基金项目（51604216）；教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目（21YJA630050）
作者简介： 李琰，博士，教授，主要研究方向为煤矿安全管理、物流管理、事故机理与不安全行为测量等。
通信作者： 张嘉乐，硕士研究生，主要研究方向为事故机理与不安全行为测量。
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-10-31