|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]舒晓苓,吴雪琴,廖斌.时间压力视角下人格特征与VDT视觉搜索绩效的关系及形成机理*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2023,19(4):194-200.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.04.028]
 SHU Xiaoling,WU Xueqin,LIAO Bin.Relationship and formation mechanism between personality characteristics and VDT visual search performance from perspective of time pressure[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2023,19(4):194-200.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.04.028]
点击复制

时间压力视角下人格特征与VDT视觉搜索绩效的关系及形成机理*
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
19
期数:
2023年4期
页码:
194-200
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2023-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Relationship and formation mechanism between personality characteristics and VDT visual search performance from perspective of time pressure
文章编号:
1673-193X(2023)-04-0194-07
作者:
舒晓苓吴雪琴廖斌
(1.电子科技大学成都学院 计算机学院,四川 成都 611731;
2.四川师范大学 商学院,四川 成都 610101)
Author(s):
SHU Xiaoling WU Xueqin LIAO Bin
(1.Computer Department,Chengdu College of University of Electronic Science and Technology,Chengdu Sichuan 611731,China;
2.School of Business,Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu Sichuan 610101,China)
关键词:
时间压力人格特征视频显示终端视觉搜索计算机模拟
Keywords:
time pressure personality characteristic video display terminal (VDT) visual search computer simulation
分类号:
X913.4;TP399
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.04.028
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为合理选拔和培训特定情境下的视觉搜索安检人员,从时间压力视角分析大五人格特征与视觉显示终端(visual display terminal,VDT)的视觉搜索绩效的关系。通过变量分析和设计,提出VDT视觉搜索绩效影响因素理论模型;运用Visual Studio设计实验模拟视觉搜索安检任务,采集绩效及眼动数据;最后进行有中介的调节模型检验。研究结果表明:不同人格特征的VDT视觉搜索绩效存在差异;所有人格特征的搜索策略随机指数随时间压力的增加而降低,但调整强度在不同人格特征之间存在差异,严谨性人格调整幅度最大;时间压力通过搜索策略的中介作用(部分)间接调节人格特征与VDT视觉搜索绩效的关系;较高和较低时间压力下,严谨性人格通过有效的搜索策略调整,绩效最好;中等时间压力下,开放性人格的绩效最好。研究结果可为视觉搜索作业人员的选拔和培训提供理论依据。
Abstract:
To select and train the visual search security personnel in specific situations reasonably,the relationship between the big five personality characteristics and visual search performance of video display terminal (VDT) was analyzed from the perspective of time pressure.Firstly,a theoretical model of factors influencing the VDT visual search performance was proposed by the variable analysis and design.Then the experiments were designed with Visual Studio to simulate the tasks of visual search security inspection,and the performance and eye movement data were collected.Finally,the mediated moderation model was tested.The results showed that there were differences in VDT visual search performance of different personality characteristics.The search strategy random indexes of all personality characteristics decreased with the increase of time pressure,but the adjustment intensity was different among different personality characteristics,and the adjustment amplitude of conscientiousness personality was the largest.The time pressure indirectly moderated the relationship between personality characteristics and VDT visual search performance through the mediating role (partial) of search strategy.Under the higher and lower time pressure,the conscientiousness personality had the best performance through the effective search strategy adjustment.Under the moderate time pressure,the performance of open personality was the best.The results can provide theoretical basis for the selection and training of visual search operators.

参考文献/References:

[1]于瑞峰,孔哲昕.视觉搜索策略研究综述[J].人类工效学,2012,18(2):93-95. YU Ruifeng,KONG Zhexin.A review of visual search strategies[J].Chinese Journal of Ergonomics,2012,18(2):93-95.
[2]DRURY C G,CLEMENT M R.The effect of area,density,and number of background characters on visual search[J].Human Factors,1978,20(5):597-602.
[3]刘畅,邬歆,于瑞峰.语音噪声环境下的视觉搜索绩效研究[J].工业工程与管理,2014,19(5):134-139. LIU Chang,WU Xin,YU Ruifeng.Research on visual search performance in speech noise environ-ment[J].Industrial Engineering and Management,2014,19(5):134-139.
[4]CHAN A H S,TANG N Y W.Visual lobe shape and search performance for targets of different difficulty[J].Ergonomics,2007,50(2):289-318.
[5]罗俊浩,廖斌,王泰鑫,等.基于模糊评价的VDT系统搜索策略绩效形成机理研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2019,15(11):158-163. LUO Junhao,LIAO Bin,WANG Taixin,et al.Study on formation mechanism of VDT systematic search strategy performance based on fuzzy evaluation[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2019,15(11):158-163.
[6]SALGADO J F,TA'URIZ G.The five-factor model,forced-choice personality inventories and performance:a comprehensive meta-analysis of academic and occupational validity studies[J].European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,2014,23(1):3-30.
[7]BOUCHARD T J.Genes,environment,and personality[J].Science,1994,264(5166):1700-1701.
[8]杨林栋,于瑞峰.人格特征和任务难度对视觉搜索绩效的影响[J].工业工程,2016,19(1):91-96. YANG Lindong,YU Ruifeng.A study of personality and effect of task difficulty on visual search performance[J].Industrial Engineering Journal,2016,19(1):91-96.
[9]MOACDIEH N.The effects of data density display organization and stress on search performance:an eye tracking study of clutter[J].IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems,2017(6):1-10.
[10]顾雪英,胡湜.MBTI人格类型量表:新近发展及应用[J].心理科学进展,2012,20(10):1700-1708. GU Xueying,HU Shi.MBTI:new development and application[J].Advances in Psychological Science,2012,20(10):1700-1708.
[11]JOHN O P,NAUMANN L R,SOTO C J.Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy:history,measurement,and conceptual issues[M].New York:The Guilford Press,2008:114-158.
[12]王孟成,戴晓阳,姚树桥.中国大五人格问卷的初步编制Ⅲ:简式版的制定及信效度检验[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2011,19(4):454-457. WANG Mengcheng,DAI Xiaoyang,YAO Shuqiao.Development of the Chinese big five personality inventory (CBF-PI) ⅲ:psychometric properties of CBF-PI brief version[J].Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology,2011,19(4):454-457.
[13]ROBERTS B W.Back to the future:personality and assessment,and personality development[J].Journal of Research in Personality,2009,43(2):137-145.
[14]张永红,陈有国,李婷婷,等.时间压力与乐观——悲观倾向对购买决策的影响[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2011,37(6):13-17. ZHANG Yonghong,CHEN Youguo,LI Tingting,et al.The effect of time pressure and optimism pessimism tendency on purchase decision[J].Journal of Southwest University (Social Sciences Edition),2011,37(6):13-17.
[15]LIU C,WEI Y.The impacts of time constraint on users’ search strategy during search process[J].Proceedings of the Association for Information Science & Technology,2016,53(1):689-702.
[16]王馨悦,刘畅.时间限制与时间压力下的信息行为研究综述[J].图书情报工作,2022,66(9):140-150. WANG Xinyue,LIU Chang.A review of information behavior studies under time constraints and time pressure[J].Library and Information Service,2022,66(9):140-150.
[17]孙俊才,陈永强.眼见为实?视觉搜索的证实反应与策略反应[J].心理科学,2020,43(2):296-301. SUN Juncai,CHEN Yongqiang.Seeing is believing? The confirmation and strategy response in visual search[J].Journal of Psychological Science,2020,43(2):296-301.
[18]DRURY C G.Inspection of sheet materials:model and data[J].Human Factors,1975,17(3):257-265.
[19]CHRISTOPHER D W,JUSTIN G H,SIMON B,et al.Engineering psychology & human performance[M].New Jersey:Person Education inc.,2012.
[20]国家职业分类大典修订工作委员会.中华人民共和国职业分类大典[M].北京:中国劳动社会保障出版社,2015.
[21]温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274. WEN Zhonglin,HOU Jietai,ZHANG Lei.A comparison of moderator and mediator and their applications[J].Acta Psychologica Sinica,2005,37(2):268-274.
[22]叶宝娟,温忠麟.有中介的调节模型检验方法:甄别和整合[J].心理学报,2013,45(9):1050-1060. YE Baojuan,WEN Zhonglin.A discussion on testing methods for mediated moderation models:discrimination and integration[J].Acta Psychologica Sinica,2013,45(9):1050-1060.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵亮,刘浩学.驾驶行为特性与人格特征关系研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(8):171.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.029]
 ZHAO Liang,LIU Haoxue.Study on relationship between driving behavior characteristics and personality traits[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(4):171.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.029]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2022-10-26
* 基金项目: 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(19YJAZH051);四川省软科学研究项目(2020JDR0267)
作者简介: 舒晓苓,硕士,副教授,主要研究方向为计算机应用、人机交互。
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-05-11