|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]孙瑞山,孙军亚,何鹏,等.防疫豁免政策下的飞行机组舱内警觉性预测仿真*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(1):5-10.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.01.001]
　SUN Ruishan,SUN Junya,HE Peng,et al.Simulation on alertness prediction of flight crew in cockpit under epidemic prevention exemption policy[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(1):5-10.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.01.001]
点击复制

防疫豁免政策下的飞行机组舱内警觉性预测仿真*
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
18
期数:
2022年1期
页码:
5-10
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2022-01-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Simulation on alertness prediction of flight crew in cockpit under epidemic prevention exemption policy
文章编号:
1673-193X(2022)-01-0005-06
作者:
孙瑞山; 孙军亚; 何鹏; 卢飞
（1.中国民航大学 飞行分校，天津 300300；
2.中国民航大学 民航安全科学研究所，天津 300300；
3.中国民航大学 空中交通管理学院，天津 300300）
Author(s):
SUN Ruishan;  SUN Junya;  HE Peng;  LU Fei
(1.Flight Academy,Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin 300300,China;
2.Research Institute of Civil Aviation Safety,Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin 300300,China;
3.College of Air Traffic Management,Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin 300300,China)
关键词:
豁免办法; 警觉能心理疲劳风险模型; 驾驶舱; 机组警觉性预测; 数值模拟仿真
Keywords:
exemption method;  risk model of alertness energy mental fatigue;  cockpit;  alertness prediction of flight crew;  numerical simulation
分类号:
X949
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.01.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为验证《疫情期间豁免机组成员值勤期、飞行时间限制的实施办法》的可行性，以及为其提供科学依据。以飞行机组成员在驾驶舱内的警觉性变化为验证指标，基于警觉能理论，建立量化评估驾驶舱内飞行机组警觉性的数学模型，以飞行过程中的轮换安排为例进行舱内机组警觉性的数值模拟仿真，并对比分析“CCAR-121 部”规章与“豁免办法”中不同飞行时间限制下的舱内机组警觉性预测仿真结果。结果表明：以文中排班和轮换安排的情况下，以“豁免办法”进行运行时，驾驶舱内飞行机组的警觉性整体上不低于“CCAR-121 部”规定，因此，“豁免办法”的实施具有可行性和科学性。
Abstract:
In order to verify the feasibility of ‘Implementation Measures for Exempting Crew Members from Duty Period and Flight Time Requirements during COVID-19’,and provide scientific basis for it,taking the alertness change of flight crew members in the cockpit as the verification index,and based on the alertness energy theory,a mathematical model was established to quantitatively evaluate the alertness of flight crew in the cockpit during flight.Taking the rotation arrangement during flight as an example,the numerical simulation of crew alertness in the cockpit was carried out,and the simulation results of alertness prediction of flight crew in cockpit under different flight time restrictions of CCAR121 regulation and “exemption method” were compared and analyzed.The results showed that in the case of the schedule arrangement and rotation arrangement,the overall alertness of flight crew in the cockpit under the “exemption method” was not lower than that of CCAR121 regulation,and the implementation of the “exemption method” was feasible and scientific.

参考文献/References:

［1］中国民用航空局.疫情期间豁免机组成员值勤期、飞行时间限制的实施办法［EB/OL］.(2020-11-29) ［2021-04-08］.http://www.caac.gov.cn/XXGK/XXGK/ZCFBJD/202012/t20201223_205708.html.
［2］孙瑞山,田万里.飞行疲劳检测方法研究进展［J］.职业与健康,2015,31(8):1142-1146. SUN Ruishan,TIAN Wanli.Research progress on flight crew fatigue detection methods［J］.Occupational Health,2015,31(8):1142-1146.
［3］ICAO,IATA,IFALPA.Fatigue risk management systems:implementation guide for regulators［S］.2011.
［4］宋歌,孙瑞山,李敬强,等.民航飞行员疲劳生物数学模型研究与现状［J］.职业与健康,2014,30(5):694-698. SONG Ge,SUN Ruishan,LI Jingqiang,et al.Present situation and study on civil aviation pilots’ fatigue biomathematical model［J］.Occupational Health,2014,30(5):694-698.
［5］孙殿阁,盖文妹,段炼,等.基于生物数学模型的飞行疲劳预测建模与仿真［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(3):165-168. SUN Diange,GAI Wenmei,DUAN Lian,et al.Modeling and simulation of flight fatigue prediction based on biomathematical model［J］.Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2016,12(3):165-168.
［6］ACHERMANN P.The two-process model of sleep regulation revisited［J］.Aviation Space,and Environmental Medicine,2004,75(3):A37-A43.
［7］AKERSTEDT T，FOLKARD S，PORTIN C.Predictions from the Three-Process Model of Alertness［J］.Aviation Space,and Environmental Medicine，2004，75(3):A75-A83.
［8］GANDER P,HARTLEY L,POWELL D,et al.Fatigue risk management:Organizational factors at the regulatory and industry/company level［J］.Accident Analysis & Prevention,2011,43(2):573-590.
［9］HURSH SR.System and method for evaluation task effectiveness based on sleep pattern:US.Patent 6,579,233［P］.2003-06-17.
［10］CIRCADIAN.CAS-5:Fatigue risk model for crew planners.［EB/OL］(2011-3-15)［2021-04-08］.http://www.circadian.com/247-industries/aviation/cas-5-fatigue-risk-model.html.
［11］DAWSON D,FLETCHER A,ROACH G D.A model to predict work-related fatigue based on hours of work［J］.Aviation Space & Environmental Medicine,2004,75(3):A61-A69.
［12］FLETCHER,A.AND D.DAWSON.Field-based validations of a work-related fatigue model based on hours of work［J］.Transportation Research,2001,4(Part F):75-88.
［13］DEAN,DENNIS,FLETCHER,et al. Developing mathematical models of neurobehavioral performance for the“real world”［J］.Journal of BiologicalRhythms ,2007 ,22(3):246-258.
［14］TORBJRN,KERSTEDT,JENNIE,et al. Predicting road crashes from a mathematical model of alertness regulation—The Sleep/Wake Predictor［J］.Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2008,40(4):1480-1485.
［15］孙瑞山,刘晓慧,吴迪.警觉能心理疲劳风险模型［J］.中国安全科学学报,2019,29(10):1-5. SUN Ruishan,LIU Xiaohui,WU Di.Research on mental fatigue risk model based on alertness energy［J］.China Safety Science Journal,2019,29(10):1-5.
［16］中国民用航空局.大型飞机公共航空运输承运人运行合格审定规则［EB/OL］.(2005-02-25) ［2021-04-08］.http://www.caac.gov.cn/XXGK/XXGK/MHGZ/201511/t20151102_8492.html.
［17］HURSH S R,REDMOND D P,JOHNSON M L,et al.Fatigue models for applied research in warfighting［C］// Fatigue and Performance Modeling Workshop,2004.
［18］吴迪.管制员疲劳风险预测模型研究［D］.天津：中国民航大学,2018.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2021-04-08
* 基金项目： 中国民航大学研究生科技创新基金项目（2020YJB003）；天津市教委科研计划项目（2020KJ029）；国家自然科学基金青年基金项目（71701202）
作者简介： 孙瑞山，硕士，教授，主要研究方向为民航安全管理，航空人为因素。
通信作者： 孙军亚，博士研究生，主要研究方向为民航安全管理理论与方法。
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-02-19