|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]阎凌宇,程丽云,李威君,等.基于AHP-联系熵的应急预案实施过程风险评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(2):130-135.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.02.021]
　YAN Lingyu,CHENG Liyun,LI Weijun,et al.Risk assessment on implementation process of emergency plan based on AHP connection entropy method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2020,16(2):130-135.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.02.021]
点击复制

基于AHP-联系熵的应急预案实施过程风险评估()
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
16
期数:
2020年2期
页码:
130-135
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2020-02-29

文章信息/Info

Title:
Risk assessment on implementation process of emergency plan based on AHP connection entropy method
文章编号:
1673-193X(2020)-02-0130-06
作者:
阎凌宇; 程丽云; 李威君; 孙艺博
（1.山东科技大学 安全与环境工程学院，山东 青岛 266590；
2.矿山灾害预防控制省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地，山东 青岛 266590；
3.山东大学（威海） 机电与信息工程学院，山东 威海 264209；
4.山东海普安全环保技术有限公司，山东 青岛 266001）
Author(s):
YAN Lingyu;  CHENG Liyun;  LI Weijun; SUN Yibo
(1.College of Safety and Environmental Engineering,Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao Shandong;
2.State Key Laboratory of Mining Disaster Prevention and Control Cofounded by Shandong Province and the Ministry of Science and Technology,Qingdao Shandong;
3.College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering,Shandong University (Weihai),Weihai Shandong;
4.Shandong HELP Safety and Environmental Protection Technology Pty Ltd.Qingdao Shandong)
关键词:
AHP-联系熵; 应急预案实施; 应急管理; 风险评估
Keywords:
AHP connection entropy;  emergency plan implementation;  emergency management;  risk assessment
分类号:
X913
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2020.02.021
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
应急预案制定后的实施对于事故发生后预案的顺利运行至关重要，因此，有必要对应急预案实施过程的风险水平进行度量。以应急预案实施过程作为研究对象，基于风险理论与AHP-联系熵耦合方法开展风险评估。以应急预案实施过程风险水平为目标层，应急预案的宣传教育和培训、应急资源的定期检查落实、应急演习训练、应急预案的实用性检验、应急预案电子化、事故回顾等过程要素作为策略层，实施方法科学高效、调动工作者积极的态度、领导的重视和能力、设备的完整性作为方案层，形成应急预案实施过程风险评估三级模型；运用联系熵表征风险标准与应急预案实施过程风险水平这2个集对之间的关联性，在AHP结构模型和权重分配的基础上计算加权熵并得到目标层的总联系熵，对比标准熵区间得到应急预案实施过程的整体风险等级。结果表明，采用AHP-联系熵度量方法提高了评价结果的结构性和准确性，比传统直接加权的方法更符合实际情况。
Abstract:
The management of emergency plan implementation is of vital importance for the successful operation of emergency plan after accidents.Therefore,it is necessary to measure the risk level of emergency plan implementation management.Taking the implementation process of emergency plan as the research object,the risk assessment was carried out based on the risk theory and AHPconnection entropy coupling method.The risk level of the implementation process of emergency plan was taken as the target layer,then the publicity,education and training of emergency plan,regular inspection and implementation of emergency resources,emergency exercise training,practicability verification of emergency plan,electronization of emergency plan,accident review and other process elements were taken as the strategy layer,and the scientific and efficient implementation method,positive attitude of workers,attention and ability of leadership,and integrity of equipment were taken as the scheme layer,thus a threelayer risk assessment model for the implementation process of emergency plan was established.The connection entropy was applied to represent the correlation between two set pair of risk standard and risk level of the implementation process of emergency plan,then the total connection entropy of target layer was obtained by calculating the weighted entropy on the basis of AHP structure model and weight distribution.Finally,the overall risk level of the implementation process of emergency plan was obtained by comparing with the standard entropy interval.The results showed that the AHPconnection entropy measurement method improved the structure and accuracy of the results,which fitted better with the actual situation than the traditional directly weighting method.

参考文献/References:

［1］庞宇.我国应急预案管理的问题及对策［J］.科技管理研究,2013,33(11):201-203，208.PANG Yu.Problems and countermeasures of emergency plan management in China ［J］.Ｓｃｉｅｎｃｅ ａｎｄ Tｅｃｈｎｏｌｏｇｙ Mａｎａｇｅｍｅｎｔ Rｅｓｅａｒｃｈ,2013,33 (11):201-203，208.
［2］李小平,张磊.基于ANP-EM分析法的应急预案评估方法研究［J］.计算机工程与应用,2016,52(24):223-228.LI Xiaoping,ZHANG Lei.Research on emergency plan evaluation method based on ANP-EM analysis method ［J］.Computer Engineering and Application,2016,52 (24):223-228.
［3］安景文,安娴,王龙康,等.基于犹豫模糊集的生产安全事故应急预案评估研究［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(5):128-133.AN Jingwen,AN Xian,WANG Longkang,et al.Evaluation of emergency plans for production safety accidents based on hesitant fuzzy sets ［J］.Ｊｏｕｒｎａｌ ｏｆ Ｓａｆｅｔｙ Ｓｃｉｅｎｃｅ ａｎｄ Ｔｅｃｈｎｏｌｏｇｙ，2017,13 (5):128-133.
［4］宋英华,陈诚,方丹辉,等.基于证据理论的城市防洪应急预案评估研究［J］.工业安全与环保,2018,44(1):38-41，64.SONG Yinghua,CHEN Cheng,FANG Danhui，et al Evidence-based evaluation of urban flood control emergency plans ［J］.Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection,2018,44(1):38-41，64.
［5］常建鹏,周国华,陈振颂,等.基于偏好信息的铁路应急预案多阶段群评估研究［J］.铁道学报,2016,38(7):15-25.CHANG Jianpeng,ZHOU Guohua,CHEN Zhensong,et al.Multi-stage group evaluation of railway emergency response plan based on preference information ［J］.Journal of Railway,2016,38 (7):15-25.
［6］李俊捷,姚欣怡,陈钉均,等.跨区域综合交通应急救援预案评估指标选取［J］.中国安全科学学报,2018,28(S2):185-190.LI Junjie,YAO Xinyi,CHEN Dingjun,et al.Selection of evaluation indicators for cross-regional comprehensive traffic emergency rescue plan ［J］.Chinese Journal of Safety Sciences,2018,28 (S2):185-190.
［7］CHEN G,ZHANG X.Fuzzy-based methodology for performance assessment of emergency planning and its application［J］.Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2009,22(2):125-132.
［8］PENADS M C,NEZ A G,CANS J H.From planning to resilience:The role (and value) of the emergency plan［J］.Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2016,121:17-30.
［9］赵克勤.集对分析与熵的研究［J］.浙江大学学报（社会科学版),1992,6(2):68-75.ZHAO Keqin.Set pair analysis and entropy research［J］.Journal of Zhejiang University (Social Science Edition),1992,6 (2):68-75.
［10］王莉,田水承,王晓宁.联系熵在煤矿安全预评价中的应用［J］.中国安全科学学报,2006,16（9）：129-133.WANG Li,TIAN Shuicheng,WANG Xiaoning.Application of contact entropy in coal mine safety pre evaluation ［J］.Chinese Journal of Safety Science,2006,16（9）：129-133..
［11］梁伟,李威君,张来斌,等.基于IVM-AHP的人-机-环耦合系统应急救援脆弱性分析［J］.安全与环境工程,2015,22(2):84-87,91.LIANG Wei,LI Weijun,ZHANG Laibin,et al.Vulnerability analysis of emergency rescue of man-machine-loop coupling system based on IVM-AHP ［J］.Safety and Environment Engineering,2015,22 (2):84-87,91.
［12］叶义成,柯丽华,黄德育.系统综合评价技术及其应用［M］.北京:冶金工业出版社,2006.
［13］周延,姜威.安全管理学［M］.徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2013.
［14］葛世伦.用1—9标度法确定功能评价系数［J］.价值工程,1989(1):33-34.GE Shilun.Determining the coefficient of functional evaluation by 1-9 scale method ［J］.Value Engineering,1989 (1):33-34.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2019-11-11
* 基金项目： 国家自然科学基金项目（51904169）；山东省自然科学基金项目（ZR2019BEE018）；山东科技大学人才引进科研启动基金项目（2017RCJJ002）；山东科技大学矿业与安全工程学院“一流学科”建设专项项目（01AQ01805）
作者简介： 阎凌宇，本科，主要研究方向为安全工程。
通信作者： 李威君，博士，讲师，主要研究方向为油气生产事故预防与风险控制理论与技术。
更新日期/Last Update: