|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]付帅.基于钻孔气体漏失量法巷帮卸压带宽度确定研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(11):121-126.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.11.019]
　FU Shuai.Research on determination of pressure relief range at roadway sidewall based on borehole gas leakage quantity method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2018,14(11):121-126.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.11.019]
点击复制

基于钻孔气体漏失量法巷帮卸压带宽度确定研究
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
14
期数:
2018年11期
页码:
121-126
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2018-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on determination of pressure relief range at roadway sidewall based on borehole gas leakage quantity method
文章编号:
1673-193X(2018)-11-0121-06
作者:
付帅
（郑州航空工业管理学院 管理工程学院，河南 郑州 450046）
Author(s):
FU Shuai
(School of Management Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, Zhengzhou Henan 450046, China)
关键词:
煤矿; 卸压带; 钻孔气体漏失量法; 封孔法
Keywords:
coal mine;  pressure relief zone;  borehole gas leakage quantity method;  borehole sealing method
分类号:
X936；TD713
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2018.11.019
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为确定巷帮卸压带宽度，合理布置巷道位置及确定封孔长度，提出了钻孔气体漏失量法，对某矿巷帮卸压带宽度进行了测试，并与封孔法所得结果进行对比分析。研究结果表明：钻孔封孔法测定卸压带宽度为9～10 m;钻孔气体漏失量法因充入高压气体使原始裂隙遭受楔形劈裂作用，造成裂隙扩张，测试结果为11 m，略大于封孔法测试结果；根据矿井实际抽放钻孔情况，结合漏失量法及封孔法测试结果综合确定该矿巷帮卸压带宽度为9～10 m。利用钻孔指标法进行验证，借助钻屑量、瓦斯涌出初速度及钻屑瓦斯解吸指标3个参数综合确定卸压带宽度为9～10 m，所得结果与封孔法测试结果一致，略小于漏失量法，说明对钻孔气体漏失量法所得结果适当修正后可进行卸压范围确定。
Abstract:
In order to determine the range of pressure relief zone at the roadway sidewall, so as to reasonably arrange the roadway position and determine the borehole sealing depth, a method of borehole gas leakage quantity was put forward. The width of the range of pressure relief zone at the roadway sidewall in a certain mine was tested, and the results were compared and analyzed with the results of borehole sealing method. It showed that the width of pressure relief zone measured by the borehole sealing method was 9-10 m. The original fissure bore the wedgeshaped splitting action due to the filling of highpressure gas by the method of borehole gas leakage quantity, which made the fissure expand, and the test result was 11 m, which was slightly higher than that of borehole sealing method. According to the actual drilling and drainage conditions of the mine, the width of pressure relief zone at the roadway sidewall in the mine was comprehensively determined to be 9-10 m by combining the method of borehole gas leakage quantity and borehole sealing. The verification was carried out by using the borehole index method, and the width of pressure relief zone was comprehensively determined to be 9-10 m with the help of three parameters including the amount of cuttings, the initial velocity of gas emission and the gas desorption index of cuttings. The obtained results were consistent with the test results of borehole sealing method and slightly smaller than that of borehole gas leakage quantity method, which indicated that the results of borehole gas leakage quantity method can be used to determine the range of pressure relief zone after the proper correction.

参考文献/References:

［1］胡千庭，周世宁，周心权. 煤与瓦斯突出过程力学作用机理［J］.煤炭学报，2008,33（12）：1368-1372. HU Qianting, ZHOU Shining, ZHOU Xinquan. Mechanical mechanism of coal and gas outburst process［J］. Journal of China Coal Society, 2008,33（12）：1368-1372.
［2］WANG Haifei, CHENG Yuanping, YUAN Liang. Gas outburst disasters and the mining technology of key protective seam in coal seam group in the Huainan coalfield［J］.Nature Hazard, 2013,67(2):763-782.
［3］谷拴成, 周攀, 黄荣宾,等. 巷道围岩加固体力学特性与稳定性分析［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(5):116-123. GU Shuancheng, ZHOU Pan, HUANG Rongbin, et al. Analysis on mechanical characteristics and stability for reinforcement body of surrounding rock in roadway［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2018,14(5):116-123.
［4］孙波, 张向阳, 涂敏. 深井大采高综采面矿压显现及覆岩破断规律研究［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术,2018,14(2):119-125. SUN Bo, ZHANG Xiangyang, TU Min. Study on strata behaviors and overburden strata breaking laws of fully mechanized mining face with large mining height in deep mines［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2018,14(2):119-125.
［5］钱鸣高,石平五,许家林:.矿山压力与岩层控制［M］. 徐州：中国矿业大学出版社，2010：110-112.
［6］李成武, 付帅, 解北京, 等. 煤与瓦斯突出能量预测模型及其在平煤矿区的应用［J］. 中国矿业大学学报,2018,47(2):231-239. LI Chengwu, FU Shuai, XIE Beijing, et al. Establishment of the prediction model of coal and gas outburst energy and its application in Pingdingshan mining area［J］. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2018,47(2): 231-239.
［7］魏风清, 刘少博. 新义矿顺层抽采钻孔合理封孔深度确定和应用［J］. 煤炭技术, 2014, 33(5):46-49. WEI Fengqing, LIU Shaobo. Determination and application of reasonable hole sealing depth down seam for xinyi mine［J］.Coal Technology, 2014, 33(5):46-49.
［8］魏风清, 张晋京. 钻孔瓦斯涌出初速度测试深度的探讨［J］. 煤炭科学技术, 2004, 32(5):61-64. WEI Fengqing,ZHANG Jinjing. Discussion on test depth of initial speed from borehole gas emission［J］. Coal Science and Technology,2004, 32(5):61-64.
［9］林柏泉,周世宁,张仁贵. 煤巷卸压带及其在煤和瓦斯突出危险性预测中的应用［J］. 中国矿业大学学报,1993,22(4):47-55. LIN Boquan, ZHOU Shining, ZHANG Rengui. The stress relaxation zone in coal tunneling and its application to forecast of outburst danger［J］. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 1993,22(4):47-55.
［10］张明杰, 付帅, 谭志宏. 单一低透气性煤层采空区卸压带防突范围确定［J］. 煤炭科学技术, 2014, 42(8):25-28. ZHANG Mingjie, FU Shuai, TAN Zhihong. Determinnation on range of stress-relaxed area in goaf of low permeability single coal seam［J］.Coal Science and Technology, 2014, 42(8):25-28.
［11］朱丽媛,李忠华,徐连满. 钻屑扭矩法测定煤体应力与煤体强度研究［J］. 岩土工程学报,2014,36(11): 2096-2102. ZHU Liyuan, LI Zhonghua, XU Lianman. Measuring stress and strength of coal by drilling cutting torque method［J］. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014,36(11): 2096-2102.
［12］朱丽媛,李忠华,朱小景. 煤体应力与钻杆扭矩的关系研究［J］. 应用力学学报,2015,32(3):372-377. ZHU Liyuan, LI Zhonghua, ZHU Xiaojing. Relationship between coal stress and drill pipe torque［J］. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2015,32(3):372-377.
［13］何学秋,王恩元,张仁贵,等. 利用煤岩破坏电磁辐射特性测定煤岩卸压带的研究［J］. 煤矿安全,1996, (2):17-19. HE Xueqiu, WANG Enyuan, ZHANG Rengui, et al. Study on determination of coal pressure relaxation zone by electromagnetic radiation emission from coal destruction［J］. Safety in Coal Mines,1996, (2): 17-19.
［14］朱红青,张民波,申翔,等.煤巷掘进中围岩应力演化规律及防突钻孔优化［J］.中国安全科学学报,2014, 24(4) :69-73. ZHU Hongqing, ZHANG Minbo, SHEN Xiang, et al. Law of surrounding rock stress evolution during coal roadway driving and optimization of outburst drilling［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 2014, 24 (4):69-73.
［15］刘彦伟,李国富.保护层开采及卸压瓦斯抽采技术的可靠性研究［J］.采矿与安全工程学报,2013,30(3): 426-431，436. LIU Yanwei, LI Guofu. Reliability research of protective layer mining and pressure-relief gas drainage［J］. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2013,30(3): 426-431，436.
［16］袁欣鹏,梁冰,孙维吉,等.卸压煤层瓦斯抽采渗透率演化模型研究［J］.中国安全科学学报,2016,26 (2):127-131. YUAN Xinpeng, LIANG Bing, SUN Weiji, et al. Research on permeability evolution model for coal seam being drained by pressure relief［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 2016,26 (2):127-131.
［17］涂敏,黄乃斌,刘宝安.远距离下保护层开采上覆煤岩体卸压效应研究［J］.采矿与安全工程学报,2007 (4):418-421，426. TU Min, HUANG Naibin, LIU Baoan. Research on pressure-relief effect of overlying coal rock body using far distance lower protective seam exploitation method［J］. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2007 (4):418-421，426.
［18］魏风清,闫刘强,张向阳,等. 本煤层测压钻孔分段带压封孔法试验研究［J］. 煤炭工程,2011,(6):85-87. WEI Fengqing, YAN Liuqiang, ZHANG Xiangyang, et al. Experiment study on sectional pressurized sealing method of seam pressure measuring borehole mining seam［J］. Coal Engineering, 2011,(6):85-87.

相似文献/References:

[1]梁艳.煤矿安全管理探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):149.
　LIANG Yan.Discussion on safety management of coal mine[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):149.
[2]周忠科,王立杰.基于BP神经网络的煤矿安全预警评估机制研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(4):134.
　ZHOU Zhong-ke,?WANG Li-jie.Study on safety early-warning assessment in coal mine based on bp neural networks[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):134.
[3]吴云,王鹏,胡小娟,等.基于遗传-BP算法的煤矿安全监控系统测试研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(6):72.
　WU Yun,WANG Peng,HU Xiao-juan,et al.Test Case Study of Coal Mine Safety Monitoring System Based on Genetic-BP Algorithm[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):72.
[4]田禹,高宗军,焦志超,等.煤矿井下隐蔽火源反演研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(7):70.
　Tian Yu,Gao Zongjun,Jiao Zhichao,et al.Inversion Study of the Concealed Fire in Coal Mine[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):70.
[5]江田汉.重特大事故的离散幂律分布——以煤矿事故为例[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(9):24.
　JIANG Tian-han.Discrete power-law distribution of major accidents——a case study of coalmine fatalities in China[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):24.
[6]郝红勋,刘纪坤,王翠霞,等.煤矿事故隐患防控技术研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(9):135.
　HAO Hong-xun,LIU Ji-kun,WANG Cui-xia,et al.The prevention and control technology of potential accidents in coal mine[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):135.
[7]隆泗,李基,罗芬.构建煤炭企业负责人培训考核长效机制研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(9):207.
　LONG Si,LI Ji,LUO Fen.Study on Creation of long-acting training and evaluation mechanism for coal mining enterprise executives[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(11):207.
[8]李鑫,刘双跃,梁玉霞,等.煤矿隐患分类处理系统设计探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(5):194.
　LI Xin,LIU Shuang yue,LIANG Yu xia,et al.Design of classification management system for hidden dangers in coal mine[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(11):194.
[9]徐宏杰,宫博,李德顺.基于集对分析法的煤矿危险性评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(6):86.
　XU Hong jie,GONG Bo,LI De shun.Risk assessment of coal mine based on set pair analysis[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(11):86.
[10]刘双跃,王娟,何发龙.四元联系数对煤矿安全质量标准化的优化研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(12):32.
　LIU Shuang yue,WANG Juan,HE Fa long.Optimization research of coal mine safety quality standardization based on fourelement connection number model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(11):32.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期： 2018-09-20
作者简介： 付帅，博士，讲师，主要研究方向为安全生产技术及灾害防控技术。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-12-03