|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]杨晖,李恒松,张思健,等.不同补风形式对某火车站中庭火灾安全的影响[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(12):52-58.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.12.008]
　YANG Hui,LI Heng-song,ZHANG Si-jian,et al.Study on influence of different makeup air types to atrium fire safety in a railway station[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(12):52-58.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.12.008]
点击复制

不同补风形式对某火车站中庭火灾安全的影响
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
11
期数:
2015年12期
页码:
52-58
栏目:
学术论著
出版日期:
2015-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on influence of different makeup air types to atrium fire safety in a railway station
文章编号:
1673-193X(2015)-12-0052-07
作者:
杨晖1; 李恒松1; 张思健1; 曹诚2
（1. 北京建筑大学，北京市供热、供燃气、通风及空调工程重点实验室，北京 100044； 2.中国建筑设计研究院建筑设计总院，北京 100044）
Author(s):
YANG Hui1;  LI Heng-song1;  ZHANG Si-jian1;  CAO Cheng2
(1. Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing Key Laboratory of Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Engineering, Beijing 100044, China; 2.China Architecture Design & Research Group, Beijing 100044, China)
关键词:
安全; 数值模拟; 火灾; 中庭; 补风
Keywords:
safety;  numerical simulation;  fire;  atrium;  make-up air
分类号:
X928.7
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.12.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
通过数值模拟计算，对某火车站中庭火灾补风采用下送风和侧送风时的排烟效果进行了分析研究。研究结果表明，相同火源热释放速率的情况下，无论采用何种补风形式，均有“补风量越大，模拟区域能见度越高、平均温度越低”的规律。当补风量较小时，侧送风条件下模拟区域内的平均温度低于下送风条件下模拟区域内的平均温度；而补风量越大，侧送风和下送风条件下的平均温度趋于一致。另外，侧送风条件下的能见度高于下送风条件下的能见度。对于所选用的火车站模型，最佳补风量应为排烟量的90%。在进行建筑工程设计时，应合理采用火灾性能化设计确定合理的补风方式以及补风量。
Abstract:
The smoke exhaust effect brought by different types of makeup air, including downside air supply and lateral air supply, in the atrium of a railway station was studied by numerical simulation. The results showed that under the same heat release rate of fire source, no matter which type of makeup air was adopted, the law of " the larger the volume of make-up air is, the higher the visibility in the simulation region, and the lower the average temperature" was all presented. The average temperature in the simulation region under lateral air supply condition was lower than that of downside air supply condition when the volume of make-up air was small. When the volume of make-up air was larger, the average temperature under two air supply conditions tended to be uniform. Meanwhile, the visibility under lateral air supply condition was higher than that of downside air supply condition. For the selected model of railway station, the optimum volume of make-up air was 90 percent of smoke exhaust volume. When conducting architectural engineering design, the fire performance-based design should be adopted reasonably to determine the reasonable type and volume of makeup air.

参考文献/References:

［1］黄颖. 建筑防火设计中补风设计的讨论［J］.消防科学与技术,2009(7):495-498 HUANG Ying. Study on air make-up design in building fire prevention design ［J］. Fire Science and Technology, 2009(7):495-498
［2］Candido Gutierrez-Montes , Enrique Sanmiguel-Rojas, Manuel A.Burgos, Antonio Viedma. On the fluid dynamics of the make-up inlet air and the prediction of anomalous fire dynamics in a large-scale facility ［J］. Fire Safety Journal, 2012(51):27–41
［3］Cándido Gutiérrez-Montes, Enrique Sanmiguel-Rojas, Antonio Viedma. Influence of different make-up air configurations on the fire-induced conditions in an atrium ［J］. Building and Environment, 2010(45): 2458-2472
［4］刘勇.中庭建筑防排烟相似模型实验研究［D］.重庆大学,2002
［5］S.C. Li , Y. Chen, X. Chen, G.G. Jing. Engineering Numerical Simulation on the Amount of Make-up Air for Mechanical Smoke Exhaust in Atrium ［C］. The 5th Conference on Performance-based Fire and Fire Protection, 2011
［6］Steve Kerber and James A. Milke. Using FDS to Simulate Smoke Layer Interface Height in a Simple Atrium ［J］. Fire Technology, 2007, 43:45–75
［7］DGJ08-88-2008, 上海市建筑防排烟技术规程［S］. 2006
［8］NFPA 92B, Guide for Smoke Management Systems in Malls, Atria and Large Areas, 2000 Edition ［S］. National Fire Protection Association, 2000
［9］范维澄,孙金华,陆守香.火灾风险评估方法学［M］.北京：科学出版社,2004
［10］李小华,唐景立.空调房间不同送风方式的实验研究［J］.建筑热能通风空调,2013(6):63-66
［11］李建鹏. 教学楼火灾疏散数值模拟与性能化分析［D］.哈尔滨：哈尔滨工程大学,2012

相似文献/References:

[1]侯莹,伍彬彬,邓云峰,等.集输管线安全管理与应急系统的研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(2):98.
　HOU Ying,WU Bin bin,DENG Yun feng,et al.Study of safety and emergency management information system for gathering pipeline[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(12):98.
[2]张明丽,姚继涛.基于支持向量机建筑施工安全预警模型的研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):58.
　ZNANG Ming-li,YAO Ji-tao.Study on Warning model of construction safety based on SVM[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(12):58.
[3]李俊,李克宽.机械制造企业开展安全标准化工作的难点及对策[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(3):152.
　LI Jun,LI Ke-kuan.Difficulty and countermeasures of carrying ort safety standardization in machinery manufacturing enterprise[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(12):152.
[4]王瑜,刘毅.欧美、日本与中国个体防护标准比对[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(4):76.
　WANG Yu,LIU Yi.Comparison of personal protective standards in Europe, America, Japan and China[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(12):76.
[5]李红民.FTA在高层建筑防火安全管理中的运用[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(4):153.
　LI Hong-min.Application of FTA in fire prevention management of high-rise building analysis[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(12):153.
[6]蔡勇,姚向宇.关于火电基建项目中安全管理工作的探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(4):165.
　CAI Yong,YAO Xiang-yu.Discussing about the security management of capital construction project in thermal power plant[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(12):165.
[7]刘伟虹.从尊重生命谈企业安全教育培训[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(4):169.
　LIU Wei-hong.Form the dignity of life to discuss the enterprise safety education[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(12):169.
[8]王艳,邱榕,安江涛,等.干挂石材幕墙火蔓延数值模拟研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(4):29.
　WANG Yan,QIU Rong,AN Jiang-tao,et al.Numerical simulation study of stone curtain wall fire[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(12):29.
[9]姜虹,李丽霞,沙锡东.甲苯池火辐射数值模拟[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(4):34.
　JIANG Hong,LI Li-xia,SHA Xi-dong.Numerical simulation of heat radiation by toluene pool fire[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(12):34.
[10]王文静,孙标,郭开华.液化天然气场站事故定量风险评价方法研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2011,7(4):114.
　WANG Wen-jing,SUN Biao,GUO Kai-hua.Quantitative Risk Analysis for LNG Station Accidents[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2011,7(12):114.
[11]于浩,练章华,林铁军,等.页岩气体积压裂过程中套管失效机理研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(10):37.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.10.006]
　YU Hao,LIAN Zhanghua,LIN Tiejun,et al.Study on failure mechanism of casing in stimulated reservoir volume fracturing of shale gas[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(12):37.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.10.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-01-25