[1]甘旭升,崔浩林,高文明,等.基于HFACS的空中相撞事故分析及建议[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(10):96-102.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.10.017]
GAN Xu-sheng,CUI Hao-lin,GAO Wen-ming,et al.Analysis and suggestion of midair collision accident based on HFACS[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(10):96-102.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.10.017]
点击复制
基于HFACS的空中相撞事故分析及建议
GAN Xu-sheng,CUI Hao-lin,GAO Wen-ming,et al.Analysis and suggestion of midair collision accident based on HFACS[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(10):96-102.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.10.017]
《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]
- 卷:
- 11
- 期数:
- 2015年10期
- 页码:
- 96-102
- 栏目:
- 职业安全卫生管理与技术
- 出版日期:
- 2015-10-30
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Analysis and suggestion of midair collision accident based on HFACS
- 文章编号:
- 1673-193X(2015)-10-0096-07
- 关键词:
- 人为因素分析分类系统（HFACS）; 空中相撞; 显性差错; 隐性差错
- Keywords:
- Human Factor Analysis and Classification System(HFACS); midair collision; dominant error; latent error
- 分类号:
- X913.4
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 空中相撞事故往往是由诸多人为差错相互叠加、耦合和作用而导致的，要找出事故的真正诱因，防止类似事故再次发生，难度非常大。为了有效地分析和定位人为差错，以更好地服务于防相撞的管理与决策，提出一种基于人为因素分析分类系统（HFACS）的空中相撞事故分析方法，它按照从显性差错到隐性差错的思路来分析事故的诱因，最终找出组织因素对事故的影响。并利用HFACS对巴西卡欣布上空发生的一起空中相撞事故进行了系统分析。案例分析结果表明，该方法不仅能够找出导致空中相撞事故的人为差错，解释事故发生的原因和过程，而且能够据此提供防止相撞事故发生的安全建议。
- Abstract:
- The midair collision accident is usually cased by the mutual overlying, coupling and acting of many human errors, thus it is very difficult to find out the real causation of accident for preventing similar accidents. In order to effectively analyze and locate human error for better management and decision-making of collision avoidance, an analysis method based on Human Factor Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) was proposed for midair collision accident. It analyzes the causation of accident according to the thinking from dominant error to latent error, and finally finds out the effect of organizational factors on accident. The method was used to analyze a midair collision accident that occurred in the airspace of Cachimbo in Brazil. The analysis result of case showed that, the method can not only identify the human errors leading to midair collision accident with the explanation of the reasons and processes, but also provide the safety suggestions for the collision avoidance.
参考文献/References:
［1］杨步进. 飞机空中相撞事故的分析及预防［J］. 飞行力学, 1992（3）: 87-94YANG Bu-jin. Analysis and prevent of midair collision accident between aircraft ［J］. Flight Dynamics, 1992（3）: 87-94
［2］Hawkins F H, Orlady H W. Human factor in flight［M］. England: Avebury Technical, 1993
［3］胡国芳, 张喜. 基于SHEL模型的水上交通事故中的人为因素分析［J］. 中国水运, 2008（10）: 38-39HU Guo-fang, ZHANG Xi. Analysis of human factor for aquatic traffic accidents based on SHEL model ［J］. China Water Transport, 2008（10）38-39
［4］梁曼, 徐肖豪, 邹少孚. 基于模糊BN和SHELLO模型的管制人为因素安全风险分析［J］. 中国安全科学学报, 2013, 23(11): 126-131LIANG Man, XU Xiao-hao, ZOU Shao-fu. Air traffic control human factors safety risk analysis based on fuzzy Bayesian network ［J］. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(11): 126-131
［5］Reason J. Human error［M］. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 1-19
［6］Wiegmann D, Shappell S. Human factors analysis of postaccident data: applying theoretical taxonomies of human error ［J］. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1997, 7(1): 67-81
［7］Shappell S, Wiegmann D. A human error approach to accident investigation: The taxonomy of unsafe operation ［J］. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1997, 7(4):269-291
［8］Shappell S, Wiegmann D. Applying reason: The human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS)［J］. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 2001, 1(1): 59-86
［9］刘福鳌, 赵振武, 徐桢戚,等. 基于HFACS的管制员人因失误因素分析［J］. 科技创新与应用, 2014（3）: 252-253LIU Fu-ao, ZHAO Zhen-wu, XU Zhen-qi. Analysis of human fault factor of air traffic controller based on HFACS ［J］. Technology Innovation and Application, 2014（3）: 252-253
［10］崔浩林等. 防相撞理论与应用［M］. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014
［11］郑涤滨, 万玄, 杨涛,等. 戈尔航空1907号航班与卓越航空N600XL航班空中相撞事故调查分析——民航事故调查报告之八［R］
相似文献/References:
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
-
收稿日期：2015-04-22作者简介：甘旭升，博士。
