|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]岳高伟,袁军伟,郝明通.软、硬煤层残余瓦斯含量区域效果检验临界值研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(8):132-138.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.08.022]
 YUE Gao-wei,YUAN Jun-wei,HAO Ming-tong.Research the critical value of residual gas content about regional effect test in soft and hard coal seam[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(8):132-138.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.08.022]
点击复制

软、硬煤层残余瓦斯含量区域效果检验临界值研究
分享到:

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
11
期数:
2015年8期
页码:
132-138
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2015-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research the critical value of residual gas content about regional effect test in soft and hard coal seam
作者:
岳高伟12袁军伟2郝明通3
(1. 河南理工大学 安全科学与工程学院,河南 焦作 454000; 2. 河南理工大学 土木工程学院,河南 焦作 454000; 3. 山西凯嘉能源集团义棠煤业有限责任公司,山西 介休 032000)
Author(s):
YUE Gao-wei12YUAN Jun-wei2HAO Ming-tong3
(1. School of Civil Engineering,Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo Henan 454000, China; 2. School of Safety Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo Henan 454000, China; 3. Yitang coal industry limited liability company, Shanxi K
关键词:
软、硬煤层吸附残余瓦斯含量临界值
Keywords:
soft and hard coal seamadsorptionresidual gas contentthe critical value
分类号:
X936
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.08.022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对软、硬煤层瓦斯含量区域突出危险性效检指标临界值存在较大差异这一工程实际。建立软、硬煤样相关参数关系模型,对基于残余瓦斯含量的区域防突措施效果检验指标临界值进行研究。结果表明:同一煤质软煤和硬煤瓦斯吸附量差别不大,但随着煤的变质程度降低,软、硬煤瓦斯吸附量差值先减小后增大。对存在软、硬分层的煤层,建议采用0.74MPa时软、硬煤瓦斯含量测值的小值(取整)作为煤层残余瓦斯量指标的临界值。此研究因地制宜地确定符合矿井实际的突出预测指标临界值和区域措施效果检验指标临界值,对降低防突成本具有重要意义。
Abstract:
Some coal seams do not have the conditions to determinate the residual gas pressure, and there are large differences between the critical values of gas content of soft and hard seam for regional outburst danger prediction indexes. Coal samples (hard coal and soft coal)were selected to test the related basic parameters of outburst danger, and the model is established about the related parameters to study the residual gas content critical values for effectiveness test indicators of regional outburst control. The results show that the little difference of gas adsorption capacity is between soft coal and hard coal, but with the coal metamorphic degree reducing, the difference of gas adsorption of hard and soft coal decreases first, and then increases. For hard and soft coal seam, the critical value standard can be obtained by select the smaller value (integer)of hard and soft coal content at 0.74MPa of gas pressure. So fully considering the different actual conditions in the mine with local conditions, the critical value standard of the residual gas content can be given for regional effects test, which has great significance for reducing the cost of outburst prevention work.

参考文献/References:

[1]防治煤与瓦斯突出规定[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,2009
[2]冀超辉. 汝箕沟煤矿残余瓦斯含量区域效果检验临界值研究[J]. 河南理工大学学报,2014,33(6):720-723 JI Chao-hui. Research the critical value of residual gas content about regional effect test in Rujigou coal mine[J]. Journal of Henan Polytechnic University, 2014,33(6):720-723
[3]张晋京,魏风清,刘少博,等. 平煤一矿丁6煤层突出危险性预测指标临界值实验研究[J]. 煤矿安全,2014,45(8):16-19 ZHANG Jin-jing,WEI Feng-qing,LIU Shao-bo,et al. Experimental research on critical value of outburst danger prediction index for ding 6 coal seam in No.1 coal mine of pingdingshan Tian'an coal company[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2014,45(8):16-19
[4]田富超,秦玉金. 0.74MPa压力下临界残余瓦斯含量试验研究[A]. 全国煤矿井下安全避险及瓦斯治理技术理论与实践[C]. 2011年全国煤矿井下安全避险及瓦斯治理技术研讨会,2011
[5]高保彬,李回贵,李林,等. 同组软硬煤煤样声发射及分形特征研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(S2):3498-3504 GAO Bao-bin, LI Hui-gui, LI Lin,et al. Study of acoustic emission and fractal characteristics of soft and hard coal samples with same group [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(S2):3498-3504
[6]段东,王辉跃,冯小静,等. 不同厚度软分层煤与瓦斯突出的微震前兆分布特征[J]. 煤矿安全,2011(9):9-11 DUAN Dong, WANG Hui-yue, FENG Xiao-jing, et al. Microseism precursory characteristics of coal and gas outburst for contains different thickness of soft stratification[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2011(9):9-11
[7]郑万成,邓小松,李一波. 混合煤样中软分层对煤与瓦斯突出的影响[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(12):5-10 ZHENG Wan-cheng,DENG Xiao-song,LI Yi-bo. Effect of soft layer in the mixed coal on coal and gas outburst[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012, 8(12):5-10
[8]肖鹏,赵鹏翔,林海飞,等. 混合煤样中软分层对煤与瓦斯突出的影响[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2013, 33 (1):18-22 XIAO Peng,ZHAO Peng-xiang,LIN Hai-fei,et al. Effect of soft layer in the mixed coal on coal and gas outburst[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 2013, 33 (1):18-22
[9]张子敏. 瓦斯地质学[M].徐州:中国矿业大学出版社,2009
[10]孙丽娟. 不同煤阶软硬煤的吸附-解吸规律及应用[D]. 北京:中国矿业大学(北京),2013
[11]严康. 山阳井田原生结构煤与软煤的吸附—解吸特征研究[D]. 西安:西安科技大学,2014
[12]张书金. 预抽条件下软、硬煤残余瓦斯含量差异性研究[D]. 郑州:河南理工大学,2011
[13]MASTALERZA M,GLUSKOTER H,RUPP J. Carbon dioxide and methane sorption in high volatile bituminous coals from Indiana[J]. International journal of coal geology,2004(60):43-55
[14]于不凡. 煤矿瓦斯灾害防治及利用手册[M]. 北京:煤炭工业出版社,2005
[15]崔鸿伟. 煤巷掘进工作面突出预测指标及其临界值研究[J]. 煤炭学报,2011,36(5):808-811 CUI Hong-wei. Research on the prediction indexes of coal roadway heading face outburst and its critical value[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2011,36(5):808-811
[16]王兆丰,于红,袁军伟,等. 合理确定潘二煤矿突出敏感指标的研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保,2009,36(2):27-29,43 WANG Zhao-feng, YU Hong, YUAN Jun-wei, et al. Study on rational determination of outburst sensitivity index of paner mine[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2009,36(2):27-29,43
[17]赵旭生,董银生,岳超平. 煤与瓦斯突出预测敏感指标及其临界值的确定方法[J]. 矿业安全与环保,2007,34(3):28-30,52 ZHAO Xu-sheng, DONG Yin-sheng, YUE Chao-ping. Determination method for sensitivity index and critical value of coal and gas outburst[J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2007,34(3):28-30,52

相似文献/References:

[1]赵 军 ,金龙哲,李求进,等.硫化矿石自燃过程吸附氧研究 *[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(4):27.
 ZHAO Jun,JIN Long zhe,LI Qiu jin,et al.Research on adsorbed oxygen in spontaneous combustion processing of sulfide ores[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2009,5(8):27.
[2]高飞,邓存宝,王雪峰,等.电厂烟气对采空区防火效果实验研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(11):36.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.11.006]
 GAO Fei,DENG Cunbao,WANG Xuefeng,et al.Experiment study on fire prevention effect of power plant flue gas in goaf[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(8):36.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.11.006]
[3]文虎,唐瑞,张铎,等.CO在烟煤中吸附与扩散的分子模拟研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(7):95.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.07.014]
 WEN Hu,TANG Rui,ZHANG Duo,et al.Molecular simulation study on adsorption and diffusion of CO in bituminous coal[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(8):95.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.07.014]
[4]王凯,徐敏,杨孟娇,等.多因素影响的煤尘润湿性机理研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2023,19(11):78.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.11.011]
 WANG Kai,XU Min,YANG Mengjiao,et al.Study on mechanism of coal dust wettability influenced by multiple factors[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2023,19(8):78.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.11.011]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金项目(51274090);河南省科技攻关计划项目(142102310268);中国博士后科学基金项目(2013M531673)
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-09-06