|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]彭世金,汤海平,丁雅萍,等.管道腐蚀安全评价模型特性研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(3):172-178.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.03.028]
　PENG Shi-jin,TANG Hai-ping,DING Ya-ping,et al.Study on characteristics of safety assessment model on pipeline corrosion[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(3):172-178.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.03.028]
点击复制

管道腐蚀安全评价模型特性研究
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
11
期数:
2015年3期
页码:
172-178
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2015-03-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on characteristics of safety assessment model on pipeline corrosion
作者:
彭世金1 ; 汤海平2 ; 丁雅萍2 ; 孙春梅2
（1. 西南石油大学 实验室与设备管理处，四川 成都610500；2. 西南石油大学 机电工程学院，四川 成都610500）
Author(s):
PENG Shi-jin1;  TANG Hai-ping2;  DING Ya-ping2;  SUN Chun-mei2
1. Lab & equipment management department, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Sichuan 610500, China; 2. Mechanical & electrical engineering school, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Sichuan 610500, China)
关键词:
腐蚀缺陷; 管道; 安全评价; 误差分析
Keywords:
corrosion defect;  pipeline;  safety evaluation;  error analysis
分类号:
X936
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.03.028
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
目前最常用的油气管道腐蚀安全评价方法为ASME B31G Modified、DNV RP F01、PCORRC、SHELL92。为了研究腐蚀管安全评价模型的特性，根据模型中使用的主要参数，研究了腐蚀缺陷长度、深度以及管道材料力学性能参数与管道失效压力之间的关系，并结合文献试验测试数据。结果表明：管道材料对模型预测结果影响最明显，四种模型中DNV RP F101的预测结果最接近实验值，SHEEL92模型预测结果最安全；ASME B31G Modified预测结果误差变化最大。本研究对于选择恰当的腐蚀管道安全评价模型，具有一定的指导意义。
Abstract:
At present, the safety evaluation methods which have been most commonly used on corroded oil and gas pipeline are ASME B31G Modified, DNV RP F01, PCORRC and SHELL92. In order to study the characteristics of above mentioned models, the relationship between the corrosion defect length, depth, mechanics performance parameters of pipeline material and pipeline failure pressure was studied according to the main parameters of models and combining with test data of the literature. The results showed that: the pipeline material has the most obvious influence on the prediction results of four prediction models. In the four models, the result of DNV RP F101 is most close to the experimental value, the result of SHEEL92 model is the safest, and the result of ASME B31G Modified has the largest error variation. It has certain guiding significance to choose appropriate evaluation model for the corroded pipeline.

参考文献/References:

［1］刘国志, 彭英伟, 伍东. 天然气管道完整性管理探析［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2012, 8(4):136-141 LIU Guo-zhi, PENG Ying-wei, WU Dong. Analysis on integrity management of natural gas pipelines ［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012, 8(4): 136-141
［2］生迎夏, 曾晓, 王益敏, 等. 埋地石油管道交流腐蚀风险等级评估 ［J］. 中国安全生产科学技术. 2012,8(10): 108-112 SHENG Ying-xia, ZENG Xiao, WANG Yi-min, et al. Risk rank evaluation on AC corrosion of buried oil pipeline ［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012,8(10): 108-112
［3］ASME B31G 1991, Manual for determining the remaining strength of corroded pipelines ［S］. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1991
［4］DNV RP F101, Recommended practice RP-F1 01 Corroded Pipelines［S］. DNV, 1999, 1
［5］Stephens D R, Leis B N, Kurre M D , et al. Development of Alternative Criterion for Residual Strength of Corrosion Defects in Moderate to high toughness Pipe ［R］ Catalog No.L51794e. 1999, 1:29
［6］RITCHIE,D., LAST,S.; Burst Criteria of Corroded Pipelines -Defect Acceptance Criteria, Paper 32, Proceedings of the EPRG/PRC 10th Biennial Joint Technical Meeting on Line Pipe Research, Cambridge, UK, 18-21 April 1995, pp. 32-1 -32-11
［7］杨专钊, 刘道新. 含平底型腐蚀缺陷钢管剩余强度的有限元求解和实验验证 ［J］. 中国腐蚀与防护学报， 2013, 33(4): 339-346 YANG Zhuan-zhao, LIU Dao-xin, ZHANG Xiao-hua. Finite elements analysis and experimental verification of residual strength of steel pipe with flat bottom corrosion defect ［J］. Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and Protection, 2013, 33(4): 339-346
［8］闫锋, 张宏. 输气管道高强度试压全尺寸爆破实验［J］. 天然气工业， 2009, 29(1): 95-99 YAN Feng , ZHANG Hong. Full scale burst experiment on high pressure test of gas pipelines ［J］. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(1): 95-99
［9］API Specification 5L. Specification for line pipe［S］. American Petroleum Institute, 2012
［10］Bin Ma, Jian Shuai, Dexu Liu. Assessment on failure pressure of high strength pipeline with corrosion defects ［J］. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2013, 32: 209-219
［11］帅健, 张春娥.基于爆破试验数据对腐蚀管道剩余强度评定方法的验证［J］. 压力容器, 2006,23(10)：5-8 SHUAI Jian, ZHANG Chun-e, CHEN Fu-lai. Validation of Assessment Method for Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipeline Based on Burst Test Data ［J］. Pressure Vessel Technology, 2006,23(10)：5-8
［12］Cronin D S, Pick R J. Experimental database for corroded pipe: Evaluation of RSTRENG and B31G. ［A］. Proceedings of the International Pipeline Conference ［C］. Vol. 2. 2000. 757-768
［13］Adilson C, Benjamin Renaldo D Vieira, Jose Luis F, et al. Burst tests on pipeline with long external corrosion ［A］. 2000 International pipeline conference ［C］. Vol. 2. 2000. 793 -799
［14］Cronin D, Roberts K A, Pick R J. Assessment of Long Corrosion Grooves in Line Pipe ［A］. Proc. 1st International Pipeline Conference, ASME, Calgary ［C］. 1996
［15］Woo-sik Kim, Young -pyo Kim, Young-tai Kho. Full scale burst test and finite element analysis on corroded gas pipeline ［A］ Proceedings of IPC. 02, 4th International pipeline conference ［C］. Calgary, Canada, 2002

相似文献/References:

[1]程浩力,李睿,刘德俊.管道燃气爆炸特性实验研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(4):23.
　CHENG Hao-li,LI Rui,LIU De-jun.Experimental study on the explosion characteristic of combustible gas in pipelines[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2010,6(3):23.
[2]陈升国,张延松,刘 建,等.管道内天然气爆炸火焰及压力波传播规律实验研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2013,9(10):43.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.10.008]
　CHEN Sheng guo,ZHANG Yan song,LIU Jian,et al.Research on the flame and pressure wave propagation laws of gas explosion in pipeline[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2013,9(3):43.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2013.10.008]
[3]石杰红,许巧祥,龚敏,等.高压燃气管道临近爆破施工安全性及方案研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(11):119.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.11.020]
　SHI Jie-hong,XU Qiao-xiang,GONG Min,et al.Study on safety and plan of blasting work near high pressure gas pipeline[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(3):119.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.11.020]
[4]李翔,王辉.成套装置动态风险管理专家系统[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(8):192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.08.032]
　LI Xiang,WANG Hui.An expert system for dynamic risk-management of complete set of equipments[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(3):192.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.08.032]
[5]李长俊,马树锋,季楚凌,等.截断阀室水淹后管道沉降的防护技术研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(12):99.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.12.015]
　LI Chang-jun,MA Shu-feng,JI Chu-ling,et al.Study on protection technology of pipeline settlement in flooded block valve station[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(3):99.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.12.015]
[6]范晓勇,淡勇,高勇,等.天然气管道局部等效应力及塑性变形评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(8):135.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.023]
　FAN Xiaoyong,DAN Yong,GAO Yong,et al.Evaluation on local equivalent stress and plastic deformation for natural gas pipeline[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(3):135.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.08.023]
[7]李勐,张宏,王宝栋,等.基于有限元的含腐蚀缺陷P110油管失效分析与安全评价[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(11):93.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.11.016]
　LI Meng,ZHANG Hong,WANG Baodong,et al.Failure analysis and safety evaluation on P110 oil tube containing corrosion defects based on finite element method[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2016,12(3):93.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2016.11.016]
[8]刘斐斐,喻源,张庆武.管道中氢气-空气爆轰的多级泄爆数值模拟研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(4):160.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.04.026]
　LIU Feifei,YU Yuan,ZHANG Qingwu.Numerical simulation on multi-level explosion venting for hydrogen-air detonation in pipe[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(3):160.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.04.026]
[9]姚安林,曾跃辉,罗珊,等.基于改进二元语义的滑坡诱发管道失效可能性评估[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(6):68.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.06.011]
　YAO Anlin,ZENG Yuehui,LUO Shan,et al.Evaluation on failure possibility of pipeline induced by landslide based on improved two-tuple linguistic information[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(3):68.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.06.011]
[10]闫宏伟,马建强,汪洋,等.自锁式管道内封堵装置结构与封堵性能分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2017,13(11):27.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.11.005]
　YAN Hongwei,MA Jianqiang,WANG Yang,et al.Analysis on structure and plugging performance of self-locking pipeline in-ner-plugging device[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2017,13(3):27.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2017.11.005]
[11]肖国清,冯明洋,张华兵,等.含腐蚀缺陷的X80高钢级管道失效评估研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(6):126.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.06.020]
　XIAO Guo-qing,FENG Ming-yang,ZHANG Hua-bing,et al.Study on failure assessment for X80 high-grade pipeline with corrosion defects[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2015,11(3):126.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2015.06.020]
[12]徐鲁帅,凌晓,马娟娟,等.基于DE-BPNN模型的含腐蚀缺陷管道失效压力预测*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2021,17(3):91.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.03.014]
　XU Lushuai,LING Xiao,MA Juanjuan,et al.Prediction on failure pressure of pipeline containing corrosion defects based on DE-BPNN[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2021,17(3):91.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.03.014]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-03-30