|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]姜好,张鹏,王大庆.超声波和漏磁检测结果的对比分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(11):128-133.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.11.022]
　JIANG Hao,ZHANG Peng,WANG Da-qing.Comparative analysis on testing results of ultrasonic and magnetic flux leakage[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(11):128-133.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.11.022]
点击复制

超声波和漏磁检测结果的对比分析
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
10
期数:
2014年11期
页码:
128-133
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2014-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparative analysis on testing results of ultrasonic and magnetic flux leakage
作者:
姜好1; 张鹏2; 王大庆3
(1.西南石油大学 化学化工学院，四川成都610500；2.西南石油大学 土木工程与建筑学院，四川成都610500；3.西南石油大学 石油与天然气工程学院，四川成都610500)
Author(s):
JIANG Hao1;  ZHANG Peng2;  WANG Da-qing3
(1. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Sichuan 610500, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Sichuan 610500, China; 3. School of Petroleum Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Sichuan 610500, China)
关键词:
超声波; 漏磁检测; 检测原理; 金属损失; 对比分析
Keywords:
ultrasonic;  magnetic flux leakage;  testing principle;  metal loss;  comparative analysis
分类号:
X924.3
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.11.022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
阐述了超声波和漏磁检测技术的检测原理和使用这两种技术的优点和缺点。基于对成品油管道进行超声波和漏磁检测，得到了管壁金属损失点的尺寸和分布情况。为更好地对比分析两种检测方法，提出了对两种检测方法所得数据进行对比分析的方法，以确定在超声波检测出的缺陷在漏磁检测中是否也被检出。结果表明：此对比分析方法是可行的，为判断两种检测技术的优缺点和今后对金属损失点进行修补提供了数据上的支持。
Abstract:
The testing principles, advantages and disadvantages of ultrasonic and magnetic flux leakage testing technologies were expounded. Based on the ultrasonic and magnetic flux leakage testing of product oil pipeline, the size and distribution of metal loss points on pipeline wall were obtained. In order to compare the testing methods, the comparative analysis method on the testing data by two methods was proposed, so as to determine whether the defects from ultrasonic detection can be checked out in the magnetic flux leakage testing. The results showed that the comparative analysis method is feasible. It can provide data support for judging the advantages and disadvantages of the testing methods, and for the repair of metal loss points in the future.

参考文献/References:

［1］ 简晓明, 李明轩. 超声检测中人工神经网络对缺陷定量评价［J］.声学学报,2000,25(1):71-77 JIANG Xiao-ming, LI Ming-xuan. Ultrasonic quantitative flaw evaluation using neural networks［J］.Acta Acustica, 2000,25(1):71-77
［2］ Harmut Goedecke. Ultrasonic or MFL Inspection: Which Technology is Better for you?［J］.Pipeline & Gas Journal,2003,230(10):34-40
［3］ 王瑞利,李斌,高强.漏磁检测与超声波检测技术应用比较［J］.管道技术与设备,2006,(5):15-17 WANG Rui-li, LI Bin, GAO Qiang. Application comparison between MFL&UT techniques［J］. Pipeline Technique and Equipment,2006,(5):15-17
［4］ 郑伟.基于漏磁检测数据的长输管道适用性评价［J］.中国安全生产科学技术,2007,3(5):64-66 ZHENG Wei. Fitness for service assessment of long pipeline based on inline MFL corrosion inspection data［J］. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2007,03(5):64-66
［5］ 吴欣怡,赵伟,黄松岭.基于漏磁检测的缺陷量化方法［J］.电测与仪表,2008,45(509):20-22+37 WU Xin-yi, ZHAO Wei, HUANG Song-ling. Methods of characterizing defects based on magnetic flux leakage inspection［J］. Electrical Measurement & Instrumentation,2008,45(509):20-22+37
［6］ 陈文明.漏磁检测中缺陷参数预测与定量分析［D］.合肥:合肥工业大学,2009:4-6
［7］ 丁战武,何仁洋,刘忠.管道漏磁检测缺陷信号的仿真分析与量化模型［J］.无损检测,2013,35(3):30-33 DING Zhan-wu, HE Ren-yang, LIU Zhong. The simulation analysis and quantity model of pipeline defect signals in magnetic flux leakage testing［J］. Nondestructive Testing, 2013,35(3):30-33
［8］ 高松巍,郑树林,杨理践.长输管道漏磁内检测缺陷识别方法［J］.无损检测,2013,35(1):38-41 GAO Song-wei, ZHENG Shu-lin, YANG Li-jian. Method of defect recognition of magnetic flux leakage inner detection for pipeline［J］. Nondestructive Testing, 2013,35(1):38-41
［9］于喜元,楼俊军,杨平.管道超声波检测器的应用与发展趋势［J］.油气储运,2003,22(4):35-38 YU Xi-yuan, LOU Jun-jun, YANG Ping, et al. The application and tendency of pipeline ultrasonic detector［J］. OGST,2003,22(4) 35-37
［10］林猛,牛迎战.漏磁检测技术在成品油管道中的应用［J］.化工机械,2011,38(5):618-619 LIN Meng,NIU Ying-zhan.Applying flux leakage detection technology to product oil pipelines［J］. Chemical Engineering & Machinery,2011,38(5):618-619

相似文献/References:

[1]蔡亮学,林梓巍,官亮,等.超声内检测换能器环境压力波动特性实验研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2022,18(12):122.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.12.017]
　CAI Liangxue,LIN Ziwei,GUAN Liang,et al.Experimental study on fluctuation characteristics of ambient pressure around ultrasonic transducer during internal detection[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2022,18(11):122.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2022.12.017]
[2]莫丽,雍浩,李长俊,等.油气管道组合缺陷漏磁检测信号数值模拟研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2024,20(1):5.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.01.001]
　MO Li,YONG Hao,LI Changjun,et al.Numerical simulation study on magnetic flux leakage testing signals of combined defects in oil and gas pipelines[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2024,20(11):5.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.01.001]
[3]徐鲁帅,董绍华,陈思雅,等.基于AOA-XGBOOST模型的管道缺陷漏磁信号量化研究*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2024,20(12):75.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.12.010]
　XU Lushuai,DONG Shaohua,CHEN Siya,et al.Research on quantification of magnetic flux leakage signals of pipeline defect based on AOA-XGBOOST Model[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2024,20(11):75.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2024.12.010]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
国家自然科学基金项目(50974105);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20105121110003)
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-11-30