|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]尹小贝,汪金辉,焦宇,等.高压输电杆塔防恐风险评价指标体系[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(1):175-180.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.01.030]
　YIN Xiao bei,WANG Jin hui,JIAO Yu,et al.Risk assessment index system of high voltage transmissiontower against terrorist attacks[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2014,10(1):175-180.[doi:10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.01.030]
点击复制

高压输电杆塔防恐风险评价指标体系
分享到：

《中国安全生产科学技术》[ISSN:1673-193X/CN:11-5335/TB]

卷:
10
期数:
2014年1期
页码:
175-180
栏目:
职业安全卫生管理与技术
出版日期:
2014-01-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Risk assessment index system of high voltage transmissiontower against terrorist attacks
作者:
尹小贝;  汪金辉;  焦宇; 康与涛
（上海海事大学 海洋科学与工程学院, 上海201306）
Author(s):
YIN Xiaobei;  WANG Jinhui;  JIAO Yu;  KANG Yutao
（Shanghai Maritime University College of Ocean Environment and Engineer， Shanghai 201306，China）
关键词:
防恐指标;  风险评估;  风险控制;  高压输电杆塔
Keywords:
counterterrorism index;  risk assessment;  risk control;  high voltage transmission tower
分类号:
X915.2
DOI:
10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2014.01.030
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
电力防恐是电力安全运营的重要保证。通过风险指数评价方法构建高压输电杆塔遭受恐怖袭击评价的基本层级，以技术接受模型确定防恐风险指标选取原则和特点，结合高压输电杆塔的实际参数，设定单个指标的判断方法并建立高压输电杆塔防恐风险值的算法。实例验证表明，该算法能准确辨识高风险袭击对象，能有效提升高压输电线路防恐能力。
Abstract:
Electricity power counterterrorism is an important measure for safety operation. The basic level of counterterrorism evaluation on high voltage transmission tower with risk index assessment method.The selection principles and characteristics of counterterrorism risk index were determined by Technology Acceptance Model. The judgment method of smgle index was set with actual parameters of high voltage transmission tower, and the counterterrorism risk algorithm was established. The result indicated that the algorithm can accurately identify highrisk attack object and effectively improve the counterterrorism ability for high voltage transmission line.

参考文献/References:

[1]刘铁民.低概率重大事故风险与定量风险评价［J］.安全与环境学报,2004,4(2):8991 LIU Tiemin. Quantified risk assessment for low probability major accidents ［J］. Journal of Safety and Environment,2004,4(2):8991
[2］罗云,樊运晓,马晓春.风险分析与安全评价［M］.北京:化学工业出版社,2004:144145
[3］周念清,魏诚寅,娄荣祥,等.基于模糊数学理论探讨评判地铁工程中地下水风险［J］. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(11):16291633 ZHOU Nianqing,WEI Chengyin,LOU Rongxiang,et al.Groundwater risk assessment of metro project based on fuzzy mathematical method［J］. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science),2011,39(11):16291633
[4］何永秀,朱茳,罗涛,等.城市电网规划自然灾害风险评价研究［J］.电工技术学报,2011,26(12):205210 HE Yongxiu, ZHU Jiang, LUO Tao, et al. Risk assessment of natural disaster in urban electric power network planning［J］.Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society,2011,26(12):205210
[5］吕大刚,宋鹏彦,崔双双,等.结构鲁棒性及其评价指标［J］.建筑结构学报,2011,32(11):4454 LDagang,SONG Pengyan, CUI Shuangshuang,et al.Structural robustness and its assessment indicators［J］.Journal of Building Structures,2011,32(11):4454
[6］刘嘉,徐国爱,高洋.基于证据理论改进合成法则的电力系统安全检验综合判定算法［J］.电工技术学报，2011,26(7):247255 LIU Jia, XU Guoai, GAO Yang, et al. The algorithm of power system security detection comprehensive decision based on dempstershafer theory improved combination rule［J］. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society，2011,26(7):247255
[7］汪兴强,丁明,韩平平.互联电力系统可靠性评估的改进等效模型［J］.电工技术学报,2011,26(9):201207 WANG Xingqiang, DING Ming, HAN Pingping. An improved equivalent model for reliability evaluation in interconnected power system［J］.Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society,2011,26(9)201207
[8］陆海波,王媚,郭创新. 基于CREAM的电网人为可靠性定量分析方法［J］.电力系统保护与控制,2013,41(5):3742 LU Haibo, WANG Mei, GUO Chuangxin. Based on the CREAM of the power grid reliability quantitative analysis method ［J］. Power System Protection and Control,2013,41(5):3742
[9］谢开贵,纪静,曹侃, 等.大电网可靠性影响因素综述［J］.电力系统保护与控制,2011,39(23): 149154 XIE Kaigui, JI Jing, CAO Kan, et al. Review of influencing factors for bulk power systems reliability［J］.Power System Protection and Control, 2011, 39(23):149154
[10］吴宏斌, 盛继光.继电保护设备可靠性评估的数学模型及应用［J］. 电力系统保护与控制, 2009, 37(9): 6568 WU Hongbin, SHENG Jiguang. Mathematical modeland application of relaying protection device reliability assessment ［J］. Power System Protection and Control, 2009, 37(9): 6568
[11］Tsai C, Chen C. An earthquake disaster management mechanism based on risk assessment information for the tourism industrya case study from the island of Taiwan［J］. Tourism Management, 2009: 112
[12］Liu X, Zhang J, Cai W, et al. Information diffusionbased spatiotemporal risk analysis of grassland fire disaster in northern China［J］. KnowledgeBased Systems,2010, 23(1): 5360
[13］Guikema S D. Natural disaster risk analysis for critical infrastructure systems: an approach based on statistical learning theory［J］. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2009, 94(4): 855860
[14］Feng L, Luo G. Analysis on fuzzy risk of landfall typhoon in Zhejiang province of China［J］. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2009, 79 (11): 32583266
[15］Jiang W, Deng L, Chen L, et al. Risk assessment and validation of flood disaster based on fuzzy mathematics［J］.Progress in Natural Science, 2009, 19(10): 14191425
[16］闫宏秀. 基于价值选择视域的技术接受模型探析［J］.自然辩证法研究 ,2011,27(10):3337 YAN Hongxiu.Study on TAM from the view of value choice［J］.Studies in Dialectics of Nature,2011,27(10):3337〖LM〗

相似文献/References:

[1]刘国志,彭英伟,伍东,等.天然气管道完整性管理探析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(4):136.
　LIU Guo zhi,PENG Ying wei,WU Dong,et al.Analysis on integrity management of natural gas pipelines[J].JOURNAL OF SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY,2012,8(1):136.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-01-30